College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China; Northeast Key Laboratory of Conservation and Improvement of Cultivated Land, National Engineering Laboratory for Efficient Utilization of Soil and Fertilizer, Ministry of Agriculture, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China; Northeast Key Laboratory of Conservation and Improvement of Cultivated Land, National Engineering Laboratory for Efficient Utilization of Soil and Fertilizer, Ministry of Agriculture, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jul 20;779:146485. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146485. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
A highly effective, economical, and reliable remedial technology is imperative for the successful remediation of [1] cadmium (Cd)-contaminated soil. Although certain Cd passivators have been found to be effective, the methods of assessing their effectiveness are very limited and rarely studied. This study aimed to develop a practical score method for assessing the remedial effectiveness of the Cd passivator. Ultimately, 16 evaluation indexes, 36 weight coefficients, 16 utility functions, and an evaluation system set were obtained. The repair effect of passivator was analysed according to four aspects: metal pollution, soil fertility, passivator cost-effectiveness, and crop profit. The numerical score scale ranged from 0 to 1, with a higher score being indicative of higher remedial effectiveness. There were five repair levels: level 1-5. Level 1 was optimal, and level 5 the poorest. In addition, this study suggested and designed the structure of a passivator database composed of soil information, the remediation effectiveness of the passivator, and the evaluation method. This study provides more comprehensive and insightful information to guide improved soil remediation and soil contamination control.
对于成功修复[1]镉(Cd)污染土壤而言,高效、经济且可靠的修复技术是必不可少的。虽然已经发现某些 Cd 钝化剂具有一定的效果,但评估其有效性的方法非常有限,且很少得到研究。本研究旨在开发一种实用的 Cd 钝化剂修复效果评估评分方法。最终,获得了 16 项评价指标、36 项权重系数、16 项效用函数和一套评价体系。根据金属污染、土壤肥力、钝化剂成本效益和作物利润四个方面来分析钝化剂的修复效果。修复效果的数值评分范围为 0 到 1,得分越高表示修复效果越高。有五个修复等级:1-5 级。1 级为最优,5 级为最差。此外,本研究还提出并设计了一个由土壤信息、钝化剂修复效果和评价方法组成的钝化剂数据库结构。本研究为指导改进的土壤修复和土壤污染控制提供了更全面和深入的信息。