Suppr超能文献

突发性耳聋:年龄组间的比较。

Sudden deafness: a comparison between age groups.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei, Taiwan.

Institute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine and College of Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Int J Audiol. 2021 Nov;60(11):911-916. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1900611. Epub 2021 Mar 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study compared sudden deafness (SD) cases in 20-year age bands to investigate their causes and treatment outcome.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

STUDY SAMPLES

178 unilateral SD patients were divided into four 20-year age-groups, namely Groups I (aged 0-19 years, n = 6), II (aged 20-39 years, n = 33), III (aged 40-59 years, n = 63), and IV (aged 60-79 years, n = 76).

METHODS

An inner ear test battery and/or serology assay were performed.

RESULTS

Incidence of SD in relation to overall neurotological cases did not significantly differ among the four groups. Groups I and II showed two or three audiographic patterns, while Groups III and IV had six audiographic patterns indicating that the aetiology of Groups I and II may be of the same origin, while Groups III and IV had multiple aetiologies. The hearing improvement rate was significantly higher in Groups III (62%) and IV (62%) than in Groups I (16%) and II (33%).

CONCLUSION

SD inevitably affects individuals of all ages. Significant differences in the audiographic patterns and speculative causes may account for various outcomes of treatment in each 20-year age band. Those SD patients aged 40-59 and 60-79 years showed significantly better treatment outcomes than those aged 0-19 and 20-39 years.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了各 20 岁年龄组的突发性聋(SD)病例,以探讨其病因和治疗结果。

设计

回顾性研究。

研究样本

178 例单侧 SD 患者分为 4 个 20 岁年龄组,即 I 组(0-19 岁,n=6)、II 组(20-39 岁,n=33)、III 组(40-59 岁,n=63)和 IV 组(60-79 岁,n=76)。

方法

进行内耳测试和/或血清学检测。

结果

4 组中 SD 的发病率与所有神经耳科学病例相比无显著差异。I 组和 II 组显示出两种或三种听力图模式,而 III 组和 IV 组则显示出六种听力图模式,这表明 I 组和 II 组的病因可能具有相同的起源,而 III 组和 IV 组则具有多种病因。III 组(62%)和 IV 组(62%)的听力改善率明显高于 I 组(16%)和 II 组(33%)。

结论

SD 不可避免地影响各个年龄段的个体。听力图模式和推测病因的显著差异可能导致每个 20 岁年龄组的治疗结果不同。40-59 岁和 60-79 岁的 SD 患者的治疗效果明显好于 0-19 岁和 20-39 岁的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验