Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kingston General Hospital, Queen's University, Victory 4, 76 Stuart St, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 2V7, Canada.
Health Technology Assessment Program, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Brasilia, Brazil.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Mar 22;21(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03711-x.
Caesarean section rates are higher among pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology (ART) compared to spontaneous conceptions (SC), implying an increase in neonatal and maternal morbidity. We aimed to compare caesarean section rates in ART pregnancies versus SC, overall, by indication (elective versus emergent), and by type of ART treatment (in-vitro fertilization (IVF), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), fresh embryo transfer, frozen embryo transfer) in a systematic review and meta-analysis.
We searched Medline, EMBASE and CINAHL databases using the OVID Platform from 1993 to 2019, and the search was completed in January 2020. The eligibility criteria were cohort studies with singleton conceptions after in-vitro fertilization and/or intracytoplasmic sperm injection using autologous oocytes versus spontaneous conceptions. The study quality was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale and GRADE approach. Meta-analyses were performed using odds ratios (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) using random effect models in RevMan 5.3, and I-squared (I) test > 75% was considered as high heterogeneity.
One thousand seven hundred fifty studies were identified from the search of which 34 met the inclusion criteria. Compared to spontaneous conceptions, IVF/ICSI pregnancies were associated with a 1.90-fold increase of odds of caesarean section (95% CI 1.76, 2.06). When stratified by indication, IVF/ICSI pregnancies were associated with a 1.91-fold increase of odds of elective caesarean section (95% CI 1.37, 2.67) and 1.38-fold increase of odds of emergent caesarean section (95% CI 1.09, 1.75). The heterogeneity of the studies was high and the GRADE assessment moderate to low, which can be explained by the observational design of the included studies.
The odds of delivering by caesarean section are greater for ART singleton pregnancies compared to spontaneous conceptions. Preconception and pregnancy care plans should focus on minimizing the risks that may lead to emergency caesarean sections and finding strategies to understand and decrease the rate of elective caesarean sections.
与自然受孕(SC)相比,辅助生殖技术(ART)受孕的剖宫产率更高,这意味着新生儿和产妇的发病率增加。我们旨在通过系统评价和荟萃分析,比较 ART 妊娠与 SC 的剖宫产率,总体上、按指征(选择性与紧急性)以及按 ART 治疗类型(体外受精(IVF)、胞浆内精子注射(ICSI)、新鲜胚胎移植、冷冻胚胎移植)进行比较。
我们使用 OVID 平台从 1993 年到 2019 年在 Medline、EMBASE 和 CINAHL 数据库中进行了搜索,并于 2020 年 1 月完成了搜索。纳入标准为使用自体卵母细胞进行体外受精和/或胞浆内精子注射的单胎妊娠与自然受孕的队列研究。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和 GRADE 方法评估研究质量。使用 RevMan 5.3 中的随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,使用比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI),I 平方(I)检验>75%被认为是高度异质性。
从搜索中确定了 1750 项研究,其中 34 项符合纳入标准。与自然受孕相比,IVF/ICSI 妊娠的剖宫产几率增加 1.90 倍(95%CI 1.76,2.06)。按指征分层时,IVF/ICSI 妊娠的选择性剖宫产几率增加 1.91 倍(95%CI 1.37,2.67),紧急剖宫产几率增加 1.38 倍(95%CI 1.09,1.75)。研究的异质性很高,GRADE 评估为中低,这可以用纳入研究的观察性设计来解释。
与自然受孕相比,ART 单胎妊娠的剖宫产几率更高。孕前和妊娠期间的护理计划应侧重于最大限度地降低可能导致紧急剖宫产的风险,并寻找理解和降低选择性剖宫产率的策略。