• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖宫产决策中的选择导航:来自伊拉克一项定性研究的医学和个人观点

Navigating the choices of decision-making in cesarean sections: medical and personal perspectives from a qualitative study in Iraq.

作者信息

Abdul Razzak Maysaloon Adnan, Abdulrasol Zainab Abdulameer, Obaid Ali Fadhil

机构信息

Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Karbala, Karbala Province, Iraq.

Maternal and Newborn Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, University of Babylon, Babylon Province, Iraq.

出版信息

Pan Afr Med J. 2025 Mar 3;50:65. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2025.50.65.43936. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.11604/pamj.2025.50.65.43936
PMID:40485998
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12143313/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

cesarean section (CS) rates have risen globally, prompting debates on their necessity and outcomes. This study explores factors affecting decision-making for planned CS in uncomplicated pregnancies, considering both medical and non-medical factors.

METHODS

a descriptive qualitative study design was employed from the period June 2022 to December 2022, comprising one-on-one conversations with Karbala midwives and obstetricians. Data were analyzed thematically to uncover factors influencing CS decisions. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis was followed.

RESULTS

the study included 131 pregnant women, aged 20-35 (71.0%) with different educational levels. Prenatal care engagement was high, as 98.5% received care. Planned CS constituted 52.7%, and 47.3% were emergency CS. Decision factors included personal desire (22.9%), perception of efficiency and care (11.5%), and husband's desire (3.8%). Medical reasons (maternofetal factors) outweighed non-medical reasons (60.5% vs. 15.3%), with notable factors including cervical stiffness (21.4%) and fetal position/weight (17.6%). decision-making for CS involves a complex interaction of medical and non-medical causes. Healthcare professionals should understand the reasons behind planned CS to make well-informed decisions that align with each patient's unique situation.

摘要

引言

剖宫产率在全球范围内呈上升趋势,引发了关于其必要性和结局的讨论。本研究探讨了影响无并发症妊娠计划性剖宫产决策的因素,同时考虑了医学和非医学因素。

方法

采用描述性定性研究设计,时间为2022年6月至2022年12月,包括与卡尔巴拉助产士和产科医生进行一对一访谈。对数据进行主题分析以揭示影响剖宫产决策的因素。随后进行描述性和推断性统计分析。

结果

该研究纳入了131名年龄在20 - 35岁(占71.0%)、教育水平各异的孕妇。产前检查参与率较高,98.5%的孕妇接受了检查。计划性剖宫产占52.7%,急诊剖宫产占47.3%。决策因素包括个人意愿(22.9%)、对效率和护理的认知(11.5%)以及丈夫的意愿(3.8%)。医学原因(母婴因素)超过非医学原因(60.5%对15.3%),显著因素包括宫颈僵硬(21.4%)和胎儿位置/体重(17.6%)。剖宫产决策涉及医学和非医学原因的复杂相互作用。医疗保健专业人员应了解计划性剖宫产背后的原因,以便做出符合每位患者独特情况的明智决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc9e/12143313/c1cf26369d93/PAMJ-50-65-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc9e/12143313/b4ce6df8bb2a/PAMJ-50-65-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc9e/12143313/c1cf26369d93/PAMJ-50-65-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc9e/12143313/b4ce6df8bb2a/PAMJ-50-65-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc9e/12143313/c1cf26369d93/PAMJ-50-65-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Navigating the choices of decision-making in cesarean sections: medical and personal perspectives from a qualitative study in Iraq.剖宫产决策中的选择导航:来自伊拉克一项定性研究的医学和个人观点
Pan Afr Med J. 2025 Mar 3;50:65. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2025.50.65.43936. eCollection 2025.
2
Clinicians' views of factors influencing decision-making for CS for first-time mothers-A qualitative descriptive study.临床医生对影响首次分娩行剖宫产术决策因素的看法——一项定性描述性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 28;17(12):e0279403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279403. eCollection 2022.
3
Factors influencing decision-making for caesarean section in Sweden - a qualitative study.影响瑞典剖宫产决策的因素——一项定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Sep 17;18(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2007-7.
4
Women's decision-making processes and the influences on their mode of birth following a previous caesarean section in Taiwan: a qualitative study.台湾地区剖宫产后再次分娩时产妇决策过程及其影响因素的定性研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jan 17;18(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1661-0.
5
Factors obstetricians, family physicians and midwives consider when counselling women about a trial of labour after caesarean and planned repeat caesarean: a qualitative descriptive study.产科医生、家庭医生和助产士在为妇女提供剖宫产术后试产和计划再次剖宫产咨询时考虑的因素:一项定性描述性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jun 18;20(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03052-1.
6
Understanding Factors Leading to Primary Cesarean Section and Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery in the Friuli-Venezia Giulia Region (North-Eastern Italy), 2005-2015.理解导致原发性剖宫产和剖宫产后阴道分娩的因素:2005-2015 年意大利东北部弗留利-威尼斯朱利亚地区的研究。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 15;10(1):380. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-57037-y.
7
Deciding on the mode of birth after a previous caesarean section - An online survey investigating women's preferences in Western Switzerland.既往剖宫产术后分娩方式的选择——一项调查瑞士西部女性偏好的在线调查
Midwifery. 2017 Jul;50:219-227. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
8
Developing and pre-testing a decision board to facilitate informed choice about delivery approach in uncomplicated pregnancy.制定并预测试一种决策板,以促进在无并发症妊娠中对分娩方式做出知情选择。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009 Oct 30;9:50. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-9-50.
9
Caring for women wanting a vaginal birth after previous caesarean section: A qualitative study of the experiences of midwives and obstetricians.护理有过剖宫产史且希望经阴道分娩的女性:一项关于助产士和产科医生经历的定性研究。
Women Birth. 2017 Feb;30(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2016.05.011. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
10
Obstetricians' perspectives on trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) under the two-child policy in China: a cross-sectional study.中国两孩政策下剖宫产术后再次试产(TOLAC)的产科医生观点:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jan 28;21(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03559-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Guideline documents on caesarean section on maternal request in Sweden: varying usability with a restrictive approach.瑞典关于产妇要求剖宫产的指南文件:限制方法导致可用性差异。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 18;23(1):1117. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10077-7.
2
Global increased cesarean section rates and public health implications: A call to action.全球剖宫产率上升及其对公共卫生的影响:行动呼吁。
Health Sci Rep. 2023 May 18;6(5):e1274. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1274. eCollection 2023 May.
3
Clinicians' views of factors influencing decision-making for CS for first-time mothers-A qualitative descriptive study.
临床医生对影响首次分娩行剖宫产术决策因素的看法——一项定性描述性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 28;17(12):e0279403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279403. eCollection 2022.
4
Planned cesarean section vs planned vaginal delivery among women without formal medical indication for planned cesarean section: A retrospective cohort study of maternal short-term complications.无计划性剖宫产医学指证的孕妇行计划性剖宫产与计划性阴道分娩的短期母婴结局比较:一项回顾性队列研究
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Sep;101(9):1026-1032. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14408. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
5
Caesarean delivery and its association with educational attainment, wealth index, and place of residence in Sub-Saharan Africa: a meta-analysis.撒哈拉以南非洲地区剖宫产分娩及其与教育程度、财富指数和居住地的关联:一项荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 1;12(1):5554. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09567-1.
6
An Uninformed Decision-Making Process for Cesarean Section: A Qualitative Exploratory Study among the Slum Residents of Dhaka City, Bangladesh.剖宫产的盲目决策过程:孟加拉国达卡市贫民窟居民的定性探索性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 27;19(3):1465. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031465.
7
Factors influencing decision-making to accept elective caesarean section: A descriptive cross-sectional study.影响接受择期剖宫产决策的因素:一项描述性横断面研究。
Heliyon. 2021 Aug 11;7(8):e07755. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07755. eCollection 2021 Aug.
8
Caesarean section in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.辅助生殖技术受孕的剖宫产术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Mar 22;21(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03711-x.
9
Association between the type of provider and Cesarean section delivery in India: A socioeconomic analysis of the National Family Health Surveys 1999, 2006, 2016.印度提供医疗服务的类型与剖宫产术分娩的关联:基于全国家庭健康调查 1999、2006、2016 年的社会经济分析
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 8;16(3):e0248283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248283. eCollection 2021.
10
How to reach trustworthy decisions for caesarean sections on maternal request: a call for beneficial power.如何就产妇要求剖宫产做出可靠决策:呼吁有益的权力。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Oct 14;47(12):e45. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106071.