• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阐明恋爱冲突中感知到的权力对破坏性反应的影响。

Elucidating the Effect of Perceived Power on Destructive Responses during Romantic Conflicts.

作者信息

Alonso-Ferres María, Valor-Segura Inmaculada, Expósito Francisca

机构信息

Universidad de Granada (Spain).

出版信息

Span J Psychol. 2021 Mar 23;24:e21. doi: 10.1017/SJP.2021.15.

DOI:10.1017/SJP.2021.15
PMID:33752768
Abstract

Prior research has indicated that the people one loves the most, such as their romantic partners, ironically, are also the people toward whom they often direct destructive behaviors in times of conflict, and such destructive responses become one of the most challenging relationship problems. Identifying the conditions that promote destructive (vs. constructive) conflict-resolution strategies is a crucial gap requiring study to help individuals build healthier and happier relationships. Across three studies (total N = 728), we examined whether (a) power is related to direct destructive (vs. constructive) responses during romantic conflicts; (b) this effect was moderated by the seriousness of the conflict and the relationship's inclusiveness. In Study 1, participants involved in romantic relationships completed scales assessing interpersonal power, the conflict's seriousness, their relationship's inclusiveness, and conflict-resolution responses. In Studies 2-3, the participants were randomly assigned to complete an essay in which the conflict's seriousness and power were experimentally manipulated. Findings from hierarchical regression analyses consistently showed that power led to destructive (and lower constructive) responses. However, this only occurred when the participants faced severe conflicts and their partner was not central to their self-concept. An internal meta-analysis of the studies confirmed the reliability and significance of these relationships; |r's| =.13-37. Together, these results support the proposition that power asymmetries can threaten relationships by driving destructive responses during romantic conflicts, and untangle the conditions under which this happens. The conflict's seriousness and the inclusiveness of the relationship may be considered to provide skills that help individuals navigate their relationships' life challenges.

摘要

先前的研究表明,人们最爱的人,比如他们的恋爱伴侣,具有讽刺意味的是,也往往是他们在冲突时经常对其采取破坏性行为的对象,而这种破坏性行为成为了最具挑战性的关系问题之一。确定促进破坏性(而非建设性)冲突解决策略的条件是一个关键的研究空白,需要进行研究以帮助个体建立更健康、更幸福的关系。在三项研究(总样本量N = 728)中,我们考察了:(a)权力是否与浪漫冲突期间直接的破坏性行为(而非建设性)反应相关;(b)这种效应是否受到冲突严重程度和关系包容性的调节。在研究1中,处于恋爱关系中的参与者完成了评估人际权力、冲突严重程度、他们关系的包容性以及冲突解决反应的量表。在研究2至3中,参与者被随机分配去完成一篇短文,其中冲突的严重程度和权力被进行了实验性操纵。分层回归分析的结果一致表明,权力会导致破坏性行为(以及较低的建设性反应)。然而,这只在参与者面临严重冲突且其伴侣对他们的自我概念不重要时才会发生。对这些研究的内部元分析证实了这些关系的可靠性和显著性;|r| =.13 - 37。总体而言,这些结果支持了这样一个观点,即权力不对称会在浪漫冲突期间引发破坏性行为,从而威胁关系,并厘清了这种情况发生的条件。冲突的严重程度和关系的包容性可以被视为提供了帮助个体应对其关系中生活挑战的技能。

相似文献

1
Elucidating the Effect of Perceived Power on Destructive Responses during Romantic Conflicts.阐明恋爱冲突中感知到的权力对破坏性反应的影响。
Span J Psychol. 2021 Mar 23;24:e21. doi: 10.1017/SJP.2021.15.
2
Experiences of romantic relationships among early adults who do not turn to their long-term partner when in need of love and support.在需要爱和支持时不向长期伴侣求助的年轻人的恋爱经历。
Scand J Psychol. 2023 Apr;64(2):133-141. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12878. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
3
Masculine gender-role adherence indicates conflict resolution patterns in heterosexual adolescent couples: A dyadic, observational study.男性性别角色认同表明异性恋青少年伴侣的冲突解决模式:一项对偶、观察性研究。
J Adolesc. 2020 Feb;79:112-121. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.01.004. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
4
Do conflict resolution and recovery predict the survival of adolescents' romantic relationships?解决冲突和恢复能力是否能预测青少年浪漫关系的存续?
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 17;8(4):e61871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061871. Print 2013.
5
Perceptions of partners' attributions for depression in relation to perceptions of support and conflict in romantic relationships.伴侣对抑郁症的归因认知与浪漫关系中支持和冲突认知的相关性
J Marital Fam Ther. 2014 Oct;40(4):498-508. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12055. Epub 2013 Dec 14.
6
Romantic Attachment, Conflict Resolution Styles, and Teen Dating Violence Victimization.浪漫依恋、冲突解决风格与青少年约会暴力受害。
J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Sep;46(9):1905-1917. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0635-2. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
7
Self-partner inclusion predicts performance of romantically involved individuals in a body-scaled action-anticipation task.自伴纳入预测了在身体尺度动作预期任务中处于浪漫关系的个体的表现。
PLoS One. 2021 May 18;16(5):e0251425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251425. eCollection 2021.
8
Attachment style and the structure of romantic love.依恋风格与浪漫爱情的结构。
Br J Soc Psychol. 1991 Dec;30 ( Pt 4):273-91. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1991.tb00946.x.
9
Within-family conflict behaviors as predictors of conflict in adolescent romantic relations.家庭内部冲突行为作为青少年恋爱关系中冲突的预测因素。
J Adolesc. 2008 Dec;31(6):671-90. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.10.003. Epub 2008 Nov 6.
10
Love and the commitment problem in romantic relations and friendship.浪漫关系和友谊中的爱情与承诺问题。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Aug;81(2):247-62. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.81.2.247.