• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者中胸外科医师学会风险评分的长期预后价值(来自 OCEAN-TAVI 注册研究)。

Long-Term Prognostic Value of the Society of Thoracic Surgery Risk Score in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (From the OCEAN-TAVI Registry).

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan.

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2021 Jun 15;149:86-94. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.03.027. Epub 2021 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.03.027
PMID:33753041
Abstract

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk model, designed to predict operative mortality after cardiac surgery, is often used for the risk assessment of patients considered for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We investigated the long-term prognostic value of the STS score by utilizing the data of 2588 patients undergoing TAVI from the OCEAN (Optimized CathEter vAlvular iNtervention)-TAVI Japanese multicenter registry. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to their pre-procedural STS score as follows: low-risk (STS score <4%, n = 467 [18%]), intermediate-risk (4%≤ STS score <8%, n = 1200 [46.4%]), and high-risk (8%≤ STS score, n = 921 [35.6%]). Low-risk patients were younger and were more frequently male. The prevalence of most of the comorbidities were higher in high-risk patients, while active cancer was more frequent in low-risk patients (p <0.001).The cumulative 4-year all-cause mortality rates were higher in high-risk patients (49.0%) but comparable in low-risk (22.6%) and intermediate-risk patients (28.7%) (hazard ratio [HR] for intermediate-risk versus low-risk, 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 1.37; p = 0.85; HR for high-risk versus low-risk, 2.27; 95% CI 1.72 to 2.99; p = <0.001). Similarly, the cumulative 4-year cardiovascular mortality rates were higher in high-risk patients (20.5%) but comparable in low-risk (9.9%) and intermediate-risk patients (10.3%) (HR for intermediate-risk versus low-risk, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.77; p = 0.69; HR for high-risk versus low-risk, 2.33; 95% CI 1.48 to 3.67; p = <0.001). After adjustment for several confounders, STS score ≥8% was independently associated with increased long-term mortality (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.68). In conclusion, the risk stratification according to STS score demonstrated an increased risk of long-term mortality after TAVI in high-risk patients, albeit with comparable risks in intermediate- and low-risk patients.

摘要

胸外科医师学会(STS)风险模型旨在预测心脏手术后的手术死亡率,常用于评估接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的患者的风险。我们利用来自 OCEAN(优化经导管瓣膜介入治疗- TAVI)日本多中心注册登记的 2588 例 TAVI 患者的数据,研究了 STS 评分的长期预后价值。患者根据术前 STS 评分分为三组:低危组(STS 评分<4%,n=467 [18%])、中危组(4%≤STS 评分<8%,n=1200 [46.4%])和高危组(8%≤STS 评分,n=921 [35.6%])。低危组患者年龄较小,且男性居多。高危组患者的大多数合并症患病率较高,而低危组患者的活动性癌症更为常见(p<0.001)。高危组患者的 4 年累积全因死亡率较高(49.0%),但中危组(28.7%)和低危组(22.6%)患者的死亡率相似(中危组与低危组的风险比 [HR],1.03;95%置信区间 [CI],0.77 至 1.37;p=0.85;高危组与低危组的 HR,2.27;95%CI 1.72 至 2.99;p<0.001)。同样,高危组患者的 4 年累积心血管死亡率较高(20.5%),但中危组(10.3%)和低危组(9.9%)患者的死亡率相似(中危组与低危组的 HR,1.10;95%CI,0.68 至 1.77;p=0.69;高危组与低危组的 HR,2.33;95%CI 1.48 至 3.67;p<0.001)。在校正了几个混杂因素后,STS 评分≥8%与 TAVI 后长期死亡率增加独立相关(HR,1.35;95%CI,1.08 至 1.68)。总之,根据 STS 评分进行风险分层显示,高危患者 TAVI 后长期死亡风险增加,而中危和低危患者的风险相似。

相似文献

1
Long-Term Prognostic Value of the Society of Thoracic Surgery Risk Score in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (From the OCEAN-TAVI Registry).经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者中胸外科医师学会风险评分的长期预后价值(来自 OCEAN-TAVI 注册研究)。
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Jun 15;149:86-94. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.03.027. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
2
Long-term prognostic value of the HFPEF score in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者 HFPEF 评分的长期预后价值。
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Aug;11(4):2159-2171. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14773. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
3
Prognostic Value of Hypoalbuminemia After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (from the Japanese Multicenter OCEAN-TAVI Registry).经导管主动脉瓣植入术后低白蛋白血症的预后价值(来自日本多中心OCEAN-TAVI注册研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Mar 1;119(5):770-777. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.11.019. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
4
EuroSCORE II and the STS score are more accurate in transapical than in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroSCORE II)和胸外科医师协会(STS)评分在经心尖经导管主动脉瓣植入术中比在经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术中更准确。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018 Mar 1;26(3):413-419. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx343.
5
Surgical Risk Scores Applied to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Friends or Foes? Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes From a Single-Center Registry.应用于经导管主动脉瓣植入术的手术风险评分:是友是敌?来自单中心注册研究的短期和长期结果
J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Oct;31(10):E282-E288.
6
Outcomes of Patients at Estimated Low, Intermediate, and High Risk Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Aortic Stenosis.接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄的估计低、中、高风险患者的结局
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Dec 15;116(12):1916-22. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.09.030. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
7
The MAGGIC risk score predicts mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: sub-analysis of the OCEAN-TAVI registry.MAGGIC风险评分可预测经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的死亡率:OCEAN-TAVI注册研究的亚分析。
Heart Vessels. 2019 Dec;34(12):1976-1983. doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01443-9. Epub 2019 May 29.
8
Comparison of Baseline Characteristics and Outcomes in Men Versus Women With Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术的主动脉瓣狭窄男性与女性患者的基线特征和结局比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Apr 1;121(7):844-849. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.12.020. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
9
A 3-center comparison of 1-year mortality outcomes between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement on the basis of propensity score matching among intermediate-risk surgical patients.基于中危手术患者的倾向评分匹配,对经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的 1 年死亡率结果进行的 3 中心比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 May;6(5):443-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.01.136.
10
Association between valvuloarterial impedance after transcatheter aortic valve implantation and 2-year mortality in elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis: the OCEAN-TAVI registry.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后瓣膜动脉阻抗与老年重度症状性主动脉瓣狭窄患者2年死亡率之间的关联:OCEAN-TAVI注册研究
Heart Vessels. 2019 Jun;34(6):1031-1039. doi: 10.1007/s00380-018-01329-2. Epub 2019 Jan 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term survival evaluation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis: a retrospective cohort study.严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的长期生存评估:一项回顾性队列研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 1;15(1):11161. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90102-3.
2
Update on Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Asian Patients.亚洲患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术后人工瓣膜-患者不匹配的最新情况
JACC Asia. 2024 Oct 8;4(11):793-806. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2024.08.010. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Midterm Clinical Outcomes after Isolated Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients with Aortic Stenosis.
低危主动脉瓣狭窄患者单纯外科手术与经导管主动脉瓣置换术的中期临床转归。
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024;30(1). doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.24-00123.
4
Prediction of Major Adverse Cardiac Events After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Machine Learning Approach with GRACE Score.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后主要不良心脏事件的预测:一种结合GRACE评分的机器学习方法
Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2024 Jun 28;58(2):216-225. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2024.00836. eCollection 2024.
5
Reliability of EuroSCORE II on Prediction of Thirty-Day Mortality and Long-Term Results in Patients Treated with Sutureless Valves.欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II对接受无缝合瓣膜治疗患者30天死亡率及长期预后预测的可靠性
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 8;13(13):3986. doi: 10.3390/jcm13133986.
6
Extracellular Vesicles to Predict Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation - a Prospective, Multicenter Cohort Study.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后预测结局的细胞外囊泡:一项前瞻性、多中心队列研究。
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2024 Oct;17(5):992-1003. doi: 10.1007/s12265-024-10521-x. Epub 2024 May 28.
7
Predictive model for post-induction hypotension in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a retrospective observational study.经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者诱导后低血压的预测模型:一项回顾性观察研究
JA Clin Rep. 2024 May 24;10(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40981-024-00717-0.
8
Long-term prognostic value of the HFPEF score in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者 HFPEF 评分的长期预后价值。
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Aug;11(4):2159-2171. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14773. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
9
Differences in blood flow dynamics between balloon- and self-expandable valves in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄患者中球囊扩张式和自膨胀式瓣膜的血流动力学差异。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2023 Oct 26;25(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12968-023-00970-9.
10
Surgical Mortality Risk Scores in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Is Their Early Predictive Value Still Strong?经导管主动脉瓣植入术中的手术死亡风险评分:其早期预测价值是否依然强大?
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 May 31;10(6):244. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10060244.