Department of Specialized, Experimental and Diagnostic Medicine, University of Bologna, Via Giuseppe Massarenti, 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Italy.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2021 Apr;160:103302. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103302. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
Treatment strategies for advanced NSCLC patients without driver molecular alterations are influenced by PD-L1 expression. If PD-L1 is <50 %, the preferred upfront treatment is the association of chemotherapy and immunotherapy, while immunotherapy alone is an additional option if PD-L1 ≥ 50 %. Both treatments demonstrated their superiority over chemotherapy in this subset of NSCLC patients, with comparable efficacy outcomes but less safety concerns for immunotherapy alone. Nevertheless, a significant difference in terms of early progression-free survival rate emerges by analyzing and comparing the survival curves of the two strategies, reflecting a non-negligible loss of patients due to early disease progression at 3 and 6 months from treatment initiation with immunotherapy alone as compared to its association with chemotherapy. We deeply analyzed efficacy similarities and differences of the two approaches in advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 expression ≥50 %, trying to suggest clinical and biologic aspects to be considered when facing the treatment choice.
对于没有驱动分子改变的晚期 NSCLC 患者,治疗策略受 PD-L1 表达的影响。如果 PD-L1<50%,首选的一线治疗是化疗联合免疫治疗,而 PD-L1≥50%时,免疫治疗是一个额外的选择。这两种治疗方法在这部分 NSCLC 患者中均显示出优于化疗的疗效,免疫治疗单独使用的疗效与安全性相当,但与化疗联合使用相比,免疫治疗单独使用的早期无进展生存率曲线分析和比较显示出显著差异,反映出在治疗开始后 3 个月和 6 个月,由于疾病早期进展,单独使用免疫治疗导致患者大量丢失。我们深入分析了 PD-L1 表达≥50%的晚期 NSCLC 中两种方法的疗效相似性和差异性,试图在面临治疗选择时,为临床和生物学方面提供一些参考依据。