Ahluwalia Vinayak S, Parikh Ravi B
Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2025 Jan;9:e2400157. doi: 10.1200/CCI-24-00157. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated promise in the treatment of various cancers. Single-drug ICI therapy (immuno-oncology [IO] monotherapy) that targets PD-L1 is the standard of care in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with PD-L1 expression ≥50%. We sought to find out if a machine learning (ML) algorithm can perform better as a predictive biomarker than PD-L1 alone.
Using a real-world, nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database of 38,048 patients with advanced NSCLC, we trained binary prediction algorithms to predict likelihood of 12-month progression-free survival (PFS; 12-month PFS) and 12-month overall survival (OS; 12-month OS) from initiation of first-line therapy. We evaluated the algorithms by calculating the AUC on the test set. We plotted Kaplan-Meier curves and fit Cox survival models comparing survival between patients who were classified as low-risk (LR) for 12-month disease progression or 12-month mortality versus those classified as high-risk.
The ML algorithms achieved an AUC of 0.701 (95% CI, 0.689 to 0.714) and 0.718 (95% CI, 0.707 to 0.730) for 12-month PFS and 12-month OS, respectively. Patients in the LR group had lower 12-month disease progression (hazard ratio [HR], 0.47 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.50]; < .001) and 12-month all-cause mortality (HR, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.29 to 0.34]; < .0001) compared with the high-risk group. Patients deemed LR for disease progression and mortality on IO monotherapy were less likely to progress (HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.46 to 0.61]; < .0001) or die (HR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.24 to 0.37]; < .001) compared with the high-risk group.
An ML algorithm can more accurately predict response to first-line therapy, including IO monotherapy, in patients with advanced NSCLC, compared with PD-L1 alone. ML may better aid clinical decision making in oncology than a single biomarker.
免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)已在多种癌症治疗中展现出前景。针对程序性死亡受体配体1(PD-L1)的单药ICI治疗(免疫肿瘤学[IO]单药治疗)是PD-L1表达≥50%的晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的标准治疗方案。我们试图探究机器学习(ML)算法作为预测生物标志物是否比单独的PD-L1表现更好。
利用一个来自全国范围、基于电子健康记录的去识别化数据库,该数据库包含38048例晚期NSCLC患者,我们训练二元预测算法,以预测一线治疗开始后12个月无进展生存期(PFS;12个月PFS)和12个月总生存期(OS;12个月OS)的可能性。我们通过计算测试集上的曲线下面积(AUC)来评估算法。我们绘制了Kaplan-Meier曲线并拟合Cox生存模型,比较被分类为12个月疾病进展或12个月死亡低风险(LR)的患者与高风险患者之间的生存情况。
ML算法对于12个月PFS和12个月OS的AUC分别为0.701(95%置信区间[CI],0.689至0.714)和0.718(95%CI,0.707至0.730)。与高风险组相比,LR组患者12个月疾病进展(风险比[HR],0.47[95%CI,0.45至0.50];P<0.001)和12个月全因死亡率(HR,0.31[95%CI,0.29至0.34];P<0.0001)更低。在IO单药治疗中被判定为疾病进展和死亡LR的患者与高风险组相比,进展(HR,0.53[95%CI,0.46至0.61];P<0.0001)或死亡(HR,0.30[95%CI,0.24至0.37];P<0.001)的可能性更小。
与单独的PD-L1相比,ML算法能够更准确地预测晚期NSCLC患者对一线治疗(包括IO单药治疗)的反应。在肿瘤学中,ML可能比单一生物标志物更有助于临床决策。