Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405;
Center for the Integrative Study of Animal Behavior, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Mar 30;118(13). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2016154118.
Periods of social instability can elicit adaptive phenotypic plasticity to promote success in future competition. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms have primarily been studied in captive and laboratory-reared animals, leaving uncertainty as to how natural competition among free-living animals affects gene activity. Here, we experimentally generated social competition among wild, cavity-nesting female birds (tree swallows, ). After territorial settlement, we reduced the availability of key breeding resources (i.e., nest boxes), generating heightened competition; within 24 h we reversed the manipulation, causing aggressive interactions to subside. We sampled females during the peak of competition and 48 h after it ended, along with date-matched controls. We measured transcriptomic and epigenomic responses to competition in two socially relevant brain regions (hypothalamus and ventromedial telencephalon). Gene network analyses suggest that processes related to energy mobilization and aggression (e.g., dopamine synthesis) were up-regulated during competition, the latter of which persisted 2 d after competition had ended. Cellular maintenance processes were also down-regulated after competition. Competition additionally altered methylation patterns, particularly in pathways related to hormonal signaling, suggesting those genes were transcriptionally poised to respond to future competition. Thus, experimental competition among free-living animals shifts gene expression in ways that may facilitate the demands of competition at the expense of self-maintenance. Further, some of these effects persisted after competition ended, demonstrating the potential for epigenetic biological embedding of the social environment in ways that may prime individuals for success in future social instability.
社会不稳定时期可以引发适应性表型可塑性,以促进未来竞争中的成功。然而,潜在的分子机制主要在圈养和实验室饲养的动物中进行了研究,对于自由生活的动物之间的自然竞争如何影响基因活性存在不确定性。在这里,我们在野生、洞穴筑巢的雌性鸟类(树燕)中进行了社会竞争实验。在确定领地后,我们减少了关键繁殖资源(即巢箱)的供应,从而加剧了竞争;在 24 小时内,我们逆转了操作,使攻击性相互作用平息下来。我们在竞争高峰期和竞争结束后 48 小时以及日期匹配的对照组中对雌性进行了采样。我们测量了与社会相关的两个大脑区域(下丘脑和腹侧端脑)中竞争的转录组和表观基因组反应。基因网络分析表明,与能量动员和攻击性相关的过程(例如多巴胺合成)在竞争期间被上调,后者在竞争结束后持续了 2 天。细胞维持过程在竞争后也被下调。竞争还改变了甲基化模式,特别是在与激素信号相关的途径中,表明这些基因具有转录准备状态,以响应未来的竞争。因此,自由生活的动物之间的实验竞争以牺牲自我维持为代价,以促进竞争需求的方式改变了基因表达。此外,这些影响中的一些在竞争结束后仍然存在,这表明社会环境的表观遗传生物嵌入具有使个体为未来社会不稳定做好成功准备的潜力。