Suppr超能文献

经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对初级运动皮层及其对感觉运动功能的影响:一项准实验性单盲假刺激对照试验。

Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) in the primary motor cortex and its effects on sensorimotor function: a quasi-experimental single-blind sham-controlled trial.

机构信息

Departamento de Fisioterapia, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/ La Salle, No. 10, 28023, Madrid, Spain.

Motion in Brains Research Group, Institute of Neuroscience and Sciences of the Movement (INCIMOV), Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 22;11(1):6566. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85989-7.

Abstract

The main aim was to assess the short-term effects of active-tDCS (a-tDCS) in the primary motor cortex (anodal stimulation-M1) on sensorimotor variables. These variables included discriminative sensation through the two-point discrimination (2-PD) test, tactile acuity threshold and pressure pain threshold (PPT), and electromyographic (EMG) activity compared with a sham-tDCS (s-tDCS) in healthy individuals. A total of 100 participants were included. Fifty of the participants received the a-tDCS application of 2 mA for 20 min, whereas the remaining fifty received the s-tDCS. The 2-PD and tactile acuity threshold in thenar eminence of the hand and in the dorsal part of the foot and also, PPT and EMG activity during maximal voluntary contraction in the biceps brachii and rectus femoris were assessed before and after the tDCS application. The a-tDCS intervention was not significantly superior to the s-tDCS in any variable. However, significant within-group pre- and post-intervention differences were found in the a-tDCS, such as the tactile acuity threshold in thenar eminence of the hand, with a small effect size (p = .012, d = 0.20) and in the PPT of the rectus femoris, also with a small effect size (p = .001, d =  - 0.17). Regarding EMG activity, a trend towards greater activity was observed in participants with a-tDCS compared with s-tDCS, which showed a trend towards decreased EMG activity. In fact, although no differences were found between the groups, within-group differences were statistically significant in the biceps brachii pre- and postintervention (p = .023, d =  - 0.16, and p = .002, d = 0.18, respectively), and also in the rectus femoris, only in the a-tDCS, with a small effect size (p = .011, d =  - 0.14). This study showed no significant between-group differences in sensorimotor outcomes. A single session of tDCS in isolation appears to produce immediate effects in healthy participants on sensorimotor function; however, these effects were very small.

摘要

本研究的主要目的是评估初级运动皮层(阳极刺激-M1)的主动 tDCS(a-tDCS)对感觉运动变量的短期影响。这些变量包括两点辨别测试(2-PD)中的辨别感觉、触觉敏锐度阈值和压力疼痛阈值(PPT),以及与健康个体的假刺激 tDCS(s-tDCS)相比的肌电图(EMG)活动。共有 100 名参与者被纳入研究。其中 50 名参与者接受了 2 mA 的 a-tDCS 应用 20 分钟,而其余 50 名参与者接受了 s-tDCS。在 tDCS 应用前后,评估了手部大鱼际和足部背侧的 2-PD 和触觉敏锐度阈值,以及肱二头肌和股直肌最大自主收缩时的 PPT 和 EMG 活动。与 s-tDCS 相比,a-tDCS 干预在任何变量上均无显著优势。然而,在 a-tDCS 中,发现了显著的组内干预前后差异,例如手部大鱼际的触觉敏锐度阈值,具有较小的效应量(p = .012,d = 0.20)和股直肌的 PPT,也具有较小的效应量(p = .001,d = - 0.17)。关于 EMG 活动,与 s-tDCS 相比,接受 a-tDCS 的参与者表现出更大的活动趋势,而接受 s-tDCS 的参与者则表现出 EMG 活动减少的趋势。事实上,尽管组间没有发现差异,但组内差异在干预前后的肱二头肌(p = .023,d = - 0.16,和 p = .002,d = 0.18)和股直肌(仅在 a-tDCS 中)均具有统计学意义,具有较小的效应量(p = .011,d = - 0.14)。本研究未发现感觉运动结果在组间存在显著差异。单次 tDCS 治疗似乎会在健康参与者的感觉运动功能上产生即时影响;然而,这些影响非常小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d337/7985198/1639f6e05f80/41598_2021_85989_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验