• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可切除胃癌的多学科团队会诊:一项倾向评分匹配分析。

Multidisciplinary team consultation for resectable Gastric Cancer: A propensity score matching analysis.

作者信息

Chen Yonghe, Xiang Jun, Liu Dan, Xiao Jian, Xiong Fei, Wei Kaikai, Liu Aihong, Chen Shi, Zhu Yaxi, Meng Xiaochun, Peng Junsheng

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510655, China.

Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, 510655, China.

出版信息

J Cancer. 2021 Jan 30;12(7):1907-1914. doi: 10.7150/jca.53365. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.7150/jca.53365
PMID:33753988
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7974536/
Abstract

Previous studies proposed that the multidisciplinary team (MDT) consultation could improve tumor staging accuracy and outcomes of patients with gastric malignancy. However, evidence-based reports remain limited. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of MDT for tumor staging accuracy and outcomes of patients with resectable gastric cancer, and to explore the potential factors affecting its effectiveness. This retrospective study enrolled 719 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy in our hospital. After propensity score matching, 378 patients were selected, including 189 in the non-MDT group and 189 in the MDT group. Data regarding baseline characteristics, staging, treatments, and survival were analyzed. The data showed that the staging accuracy in the MDT group and non-MDT group was comparable (53% vs 61% for T stage, 46.1% vs 35.3% for N stage, and 78.3% vs 78.7% for M stage). The MDT group had a higher proportion of preoperative chemotherapy (39.2% vs 28%, p=0.03) and laparoscopic surgery (82.5% vs 72%, p=0.02) than the non-MDT group. However, the achievement of R0 resection was similar in the two groups (93.7% vs 88.9%, p=0.73). There was no significant difference in the 1-year and 3-year overall survival rates between the two groups. Moreover, we observed poor patient compliance when the MDT recommended further examinations, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy before surgical interventions. MDT consultation has limited effects on improving the staging accuracy and treatment outcomes including survival of patients with resectable gastric cancer. Poor patient compliance may be a factor affecting the effectiveness of MDT consultation.

摘要

既往研究表明,多学科团队(MDT)会诊可提高胃恶性肿瘤患者的肿瘤分期准确性及改善其预后。然而,基于证据的报告仍然有限。本研究旨在确定MDT对可切除胃癌患者肿瘤分期准确性及预后的有效性,并探索影响其有效性的潜在因素。这项回顾性研究纳入了我院719例行胃切除术的胃癌患者。经过倾向评分匹配后,选取了378例患者,其中非MDT组189例,MDT组189例。分析了有关基线特征、分期、治疗及生存的数据。数据显示,MDT组与非MDT组的分期准确性相当(T分期分别为53%和61%,N分期分别为46.1%和35.3%,M分期分别为78.3%和78.7%)。MDT组术前化疗(39.2%对28%,p=0.03)和腹腔镜手术(82.5%对72%,p=0.02)的比例高于非MDT组。然而,两组R0切除的完成情况相似(93.7%对88.9%,p=0.73)。两组1年和3年总生存率无显著差异。此外,我们观察到当MDT在手术干预前建议进一步检查、放疗或化疗时,患者依从性较差。MDT会诊对提高可切除胃癌患者的分期准确性及包括生存在内的治疗效果影响有限。患者依从性差可能是影响MDT会诊有效性的一个因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f811/7974536/7c5fc8822f7f/jcav12p1907g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f811/7974536/f2efa3cfe7f0/jcav12p1907g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f811/7974536/042992693db6/jcav12p1907g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f811/7974536/7c5fc8822f7f/jcav12p1907g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f811/7974536/f2efa3cfe7f0/jcav12p1907g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f811/7974536/042992693db6/jcav12p1907g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f811/7974536/7c5fc8822f7f/jcav12p1907g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Multidisciplinary team consultation for resectable Gastric Cancer: A propensity score matching analysis.可切除胃癌的多学科团队会诊:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
J Cancer. 2021 Jan 30;12(7):1907-1914. doi: 10.7150/jca.53365. eCollection 2021.
2
[Prognostic value of the tumor deposit in N0 gastric cancer by propensity score matching analysis].[倾向评分匹配分析评估N0期胃癌中肿瘤结节的预后价值]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Feb 25;22(2):172-179.
3
Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Staging Rectal Cancer with Multidisciplinary Team: A Single-Center Experience.多学科团队协作下磁共振成像对直肠癌分期的准确性:单中心经验
J Cancer. 2019 Oct 21;10(26):6594-6598. doi: 10.7150/jca.32685. eCollection 2019.
4
[Application of multidisciplinary treatment in patients with liver metastasis of colorectal cancer].[多学科治疗在结直肠癌肝转移患者中的应用]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Oct 25;19(10):1124-1128.
5
Does presentation at multidisciplinary team meetings improve lung cancer survival? Findings from a consecutive cohort study.多学科团队会议展示是否能改善肺癌患者的生存率?一项连续队列研究的结果。
Lung Cancer. 2018 Oct;124:199-204. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.07.032. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
6
The Impact of a Hepatobiliary Multidisciplinary Team Assessment in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: A Population-Based Study.肝胆多学科团队评估对结直肠癌肝转移患者的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
Oncologist. 2017 Sep;22(9):1067-1074. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0028. Epub 2017 May 26.
7
The Impact of a Multidisciplinary Team Conference on Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Care: Time Barriers and Long-Term Outcomes.多学科团队会议对非小细胞肺癌护理的影响:时间障碍和长期结果
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 5;13(17):5276. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175276.
8
Effects of multidisciplinary team on the outcomes of colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases.多学科团队对结直肠癌肝转移患者预后的影响。
Ann Palliat Med. 2020 Sep;9(5):2741-2748. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-193. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
9
[Safety and effectiveness of oxaliplatin combined with capecitabine or oxaliplatin combined with S-1 neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer].奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨或奥沙利铂联合S-1新辅助化疗治疗进展期胃癌的安全性和有效性
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Feb 25;24(2):138-144. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20200721-00433.
10
[Short-term outcomes and long-term quality of life after undergoing radical proximal gastrectomy with esophageal gastric tube anastomosis and total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis for Siewert type II and III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: A propensity score matching analysis].[食管胃交界部Siewert II型和III型腺癌行近端胃根治性切除食管胃管吻合术及全胃切除Roux-en-Y吻合术后的短期结局和长期生活质量:一项倾向评分匹配分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Feb 25;26(2):181-190. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20220728-00330.

引用本文的文献

1
Adherence to Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Recommendations in Patients With Curable Esophageal and Gastric Cancers.可治愈的食管和胃癌患者对多学科肿瘤委员会建议的遵从性。
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2023 Jun;54(2):614-622. doi: 10.1007/s12029-022-00847-7. Epub 2022 Jun 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition).《日本胃癌治疗指南2018(第5版)》
Gastric Cancer. 2021 Jan;24(1):1-21. doi: 10.1007/s10120-020-01042-y. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
2
Endoscopic Ultrasonography Miniature Probe Performance for Depth Diagnosis of Early Gastric Cancer with Suspected Submucosal Invasion.内镜超声小探头对可疑黏膜下浸润的早期胃癌深度诊断的性能。
Gut Liver. 2020 Sep 15;14(5):581-588. doi: 10.5009/gnl19243.
3
Multidisciplinary management of stage II-III gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction cancer.
Ⅱ-Ⅲ期胃癌和胃食管结合部癌的多学科综合治疗。
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Jan;124:67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.09.006. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
4
Role of staging laparoscopy for gastric cancer patients.分期腹腔镜检查在胃癌患者中的作用。
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2019 Aug 21;3(5):496-505. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12283. eCollection 2019 Sep.
5
Gastric cancer and image-derived quantitative parameters: Part 2-a critical review of DCE-MRI and F-FDG PET/CT findings.胃癌与影像衍生定量参数:第二部分——DCE-MRI 和 F-FDG PET/CT 研究结果的批判性综述。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Jan;30(1):247-260. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06370-x. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
6
Updates on Management of Gastric Cancer.胃癌治疗进展。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2019 Jun 24;21(8):67. doi: 10.1007/s11912-019-0820-4.
7
Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4): a randomised, phase 2/3 trial.氟尿嘧啶+亚叶酸、奥沙利铂和多西紫杉醇与氟尿嘧啶或卡培他滨+顺铂和表柔比星用于局部晚期可切除胃或胃食管交界处腺癌的围手术期化疗(FLOT4):一项随机、2/3 期试验。
Lancet. 2019 May 11;393(10184):1948-1957. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32557-1. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
8
The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer.中国临床肿瘤学会(CSCO):胃癌诊断与治疗临床实践指南。
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2019 Mar 18;39(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40880-019-0349-9.
9
Comparing PET/MRI with PET/CT for Pretreatment Staging of Gastric Cancer.比较PET/MRI与PET/CT在胃癌术前分期中的应用
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2019 Feb 3;2019:9564627. doi: 10.1155/2019/9564627. eCollection 2019.
10
Imaging strategies in the management of gastric cancer: current role and future potential of MRI.胃癌管理中的成像策略:MRI的当前作用及未来潜力
Br J Radiol. 2019 May;92(1097):20181044. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20181044. Epub 2019 Mar 5.