Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, UK.
Department of Medical Science and Cardiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Europace. 2021 Sep 8;23(9):1446-1455. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab028.
The Prevention of Arrhythmia Device Infection Trial (PADIT) infection risk score, developed based on a large prospectively collected data set, identified five independent predictors of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection. We performed an independent validation of the risk score in a data set extracted from U.S. healthcare claims.
Retrospective identification of index CIED procedures among patients aged ≥18 years with at least one record of a CIED procedure between January 2011 and September 2014 in a U.S health claims database. PADIT risk factors and major CIED infections (with system removal, invasive procedure without system removal, or infection-attributable death) were identified through diagnosis and procedure codes. The data set was randomized by PADIT score into Data Set A (60%) and Data Set B (40%). A frailty model allowing multiple procedures per patient was fit using Data Set A, with PADIT score as the only predictor, excluding patients with prior CIED infection. A data set of 54 042 index procedures among 51 623 patients with 574 infections was extracted. Among patients with no history of prior CIED infection, a 1 unit increase in the PADIT score was associated with a relative 28% increase in infection risk. Prior CIED infection was associated with significant incremental predictive value (HR 5.66, P < 0.0001) after adjusting for PADIT score. A Harrell's C-statistic for the PADIT score and history of prior CIED infection was 0.76.
The PADIT risk score predicts increased CIED infection risk, identifying higher risk patients that could potentially benefit from targeted interventions to reduce the risk of CIED infection. Prior CIED infection confers incremental predictive value to the PADIT score.
基于大型前瞻性数据集开发的心律失常预防装置感染试验(PADIT)感染风险评分,确定了心脏植入式电子装置(CIED)感染的五个独立预测因素。我们在美国医疗保健索赔数据集中对风险评分进行了独立验证。
在一个美国健康索赔数据库中,回顾性地确定了年龄≥18 岁的患者中索引 CIED 手术,这些患者在 2011 年 1 月至 2014 年 9 月期间至少有一次 CIED 手术记录。通过诊断和程序代码确定 PADIT 风险因素和主要 CIED 感染(系统移除、无系统移除的侵入性程序或感染相关死亡)。通过 PADIT 评分将数据集随机分为数据集 A(60%)和数据集 B(40%)。使用数据集 A 为允许每个患者进行多次手术的脆弱性模型拟合,PADIT 评分是唯一的预测因素,排除了先前有 CIED 感染的患者。从 51623 名患者的 54042 次索引手术中提取了一个数据组,其中有 574 例感染。在没有先前 CIED 感染史的患者中,PADIT 评分增加 1 个单位,感染风险相对增加 28%。在调整 PADIT 评分后,先前的 CIED 感染与显著的增量预测值相关(HR 5.66,P<0.0001)。PADIT 评分和先前 CIED 感染史的 Harrell C 统计量为 0.76。
PADIT 风险评分预测 CIED 感染风险增加,确定了具有更高风险的患者,这些患者可能受益于有针对性的干预措施来降低 CIED 感染的风险。先前的 CIED 感染为 PADIT 评分提供了增量预测价值。