Suppr超能文献

高风险心脏器械患者单独使用抗菌封套的随机试验。

Randomized Trial of Stand-Alone Use of the Antimicrobial Envelope in High-Risk Cardiac Device Patients.

作者信息

Ellis Christopher R, Greenspon Arnold J, Andriulli John A, Gould Paul A, Carillo Roger G, Kolek Matthew J, Donegan Rachel, Amaral Ansel P, Mittal Suneet

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN (C.R.E., R.D.).

Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA (A.J.G.).

出版信息

Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2023 May;16(5):e011740. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.122.011740. Epub 2023 Mar 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection has a high mortality. Previous investigations showed reduced postoperative infections using skin preparation with chlorhexidine, preoperative intravenous antibiotics, and a TYRX-a antibacterial envelope. The additional benefit of antibiotic pocket wash and postoperative antibiotics has not been systematically studied.

METHODS

The ENVELOPE trial (A Randomized trial of Stand-Alone Use of the Antimicrobial Envelope in High-Risk Cardiac Device Patients) was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial enrolling patients undergoing CIED procedures with ≥2 risk factors for infection. The control arm received standard chlorhexidine skin preparation, intravenous antibiotics, and the TYRX-a antibiotic envelope. The study arm received pocket wash (500 mL antibiotic solution) and postoperative antibiotics for 3 days along with the prophylactic control measures. The primary end point was CIED infection and system removal at 6 months.

RESULTS

One thousand ten subjects (505 per arm) were enrolled and randomized. Patients were seen in person for a wound check with digital photo 2 weeks postimplant and at 3 and 6 months. CIED infection rate was low in both groups (1.0% control arm and 1.2% study arm, =0.74). In the 11 subjects with infection and system removal, the time to study end point was 107±92 days with a PADIT (Prevention of Arrhythmia Device Infection Trial) score of 7.4 and a 64% 1-year mortality. Prior history of CIED infection independently predicted CIED system removal at 6 months in all subjects (odds ratio, 9.77, =0.004). Of 11 infections requiring system removal, 5 were in the setting of pocket hematoma.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of antibiotic pocket irrigation and postoperative oral antibiotics provides no additional benefit to the prophylactic measures of chlorhexidine skin preparation, preoperative intravenous antibiotics, and an antibiotic envelope in reducing CIED infection. Postoperative hematoma is a major risk factor for infection, driven by the use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications. The strongest predictor of CIED removal at 6 months, regardless of intervention, was prior CIED infection.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique identifier: NCT02809131.

摘要

背景

心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)感染具有较高的死亡率。先前的研究表明,使用氯己定进行皮肤准备、术前静脉使用抗生素以及使用TYRX-a抗菌封套可降低术后感染率。抗生素囊袋冲洗和术后使用抗生素的额外益处尚未得到系统研究。

方法

ENVELOPE试验(一项在高危心脏设备患者中单独使用抗菌封套的随机试验)是一项前瞻性、多中心、随机对照试验,纳入了具有≥2个感染危险因素且正在接受CIED手术的患者。对照组接受标准的氯己定皮肤准备、静脉使用抗生素以及TYRX-a抗生素封套。研究组除了接受预防性控制措施外,还接受囊袋冲洗(500 mL抗生素溶液)和术后3天的抗生素治疗。主要终点是6个月时的CIED感染和设备移除。

结果

共纳入1010名受试者(每组505名)并进行随机分组。在植入后2周、3个月和6个月时对患者进行伤口检查并拍摄数码照片。两组的CIED感染率均较低(对照组为1.0%,研究组为1.2%,P = 0.74)。在11名发生感染并移除设备的受试者中,至研究终点的时间为107±92天,PADIT(心律失常设备感染预防试验)评分为7.4,1年死亡率为64%。CIED感染史是所有受试者6个月时CIED设备移除的独立预测因素(比值比,9.77,P = 0.004)。在11例需要移除设备的感染病例中,有5例发生在囊袋血肿的情况下。

结论

在降低CIED感染方面,使用抗生素囊袋冲洗和术后口服抗生素对氯己定皮肤准备、术前静脉使用抗生素和抗生素封套的预防措施没有额外益处。术后血肿是感染的主要危险因素,这是由抗血小板和抗凝药物的使用所导致的。无论采用何种干预措施,6个月时CIED移除的最强预测因素是既往CIED感染。

注册信息

网址:https://www.

临床试验

gov;唯一标识符:NCT02809131。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验