Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, København Ø, Denmark.
Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jun;37(6):1843-1851. doi: 10.1007/s10554-021-02157-8. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces the risk of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in heart failure (HF) patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) while the effect is less clear among non-LBBB patients. This study aimed to investigate if absence of LBBB features whether by echocardiography or strict ECG criteria would identify patients at risk of developing VA in a cohort with LBBB according to conventional ECG criteria. Two hundred six CRT candidates were prospectively included from 2 centers. Prior to CRT presence of a typical LBBB contraction pattern was identified using longitudinal strain in the apical 4-chamber view. All preimplantation ECGs were categorized as LBBB or non-LBBB according to Strauss´ strict criteria. Primary end-point was defined as any appropriate antitachycardia pacing (ATP) or shock therapy within 2 years after CRT implantation. A total of 129 (63%) patients had a typical LBBB contraction pattern, while 134 (66%) met the strict ECG criteria. Over 2 years, 45 patients (22%) experienced VA. Absence of a typical LBBB contraction pattern was independently associated with an increased risk of VA (hazard ratio ([HR] 1.89; 95% CI 1.04 to 3.44; p: 0.036). Strict LBBB was not independently associated with the occurrence of VA. Fulfilling neither strict ECG nor echocardiographic criteria for LBBB was associated with a 3.3-fold increase in risk of VA ([HR] 3.34; 95% CI 1.75 to 6.94; (p < 0.001). The risk of VA was almost 2-fold higher if a typical LBBB contraction pattern was absent prior to CRT.
心脏再同步治疗(CRT)可降低左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)心力衰竭(HF)患者室性心律失常(VA)的风险,但在非 LBBB 患者中的效果尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨是否存在 LBBB 特征,无论是通过超声心动图还是严格的 ECG 标准,是否可以识别出根据常规 ECG 标准具有 LBBB 的患者中发生 VA 的风险。从 2 个中心前瞻性纳入 206 例 CRT 候选者。在 CRT 之前,使用心尖 4 腔视图中的纵向应变来识别典型的 LBBB 收缩模式。根据 Strauss 的严格标准,所有植入前 ECG 均分为 LBBB 或非 LBBB。主要终点定义为 CRT 植入后 2 年内任何适当的抗心动过速起搏(ATP)或电击治疗。共有 129 例(63%)患者具有典型的 LBBB 收缩模式,而 134 例(66%)符合严格的 ECG 标准。在 2 年内,45 例患者(22%)发生 VA。缺乏典型的 LBBB 收缩模式与 VA 风险增加独立相关(风险比[HR] 1.89;95%CI 1.04 至 3.44;p:0.036)。严格的 LBBB 与 VA 的发生无关。既不符合严格的 ECG 标准也不符合超声心动图标准的 LBBB 与 VA 风险增加 3.3 倍相关(HR 3.34;95%CI 1.75 至 6.94;(p <0.001)。如果 CRT 前不存在典型的 LBBB 收缩模式,则 VA 的风险几乎增加 2 倍。