Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2021 May;45(5):1149-1160. doi: 10.1111/acer.14607. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
The role of alcohol sensitivity in the experience of blacking out and passing out has not been well established. Here, we examined the relation between individual differences in alcohol sensitivity (i.e., numbers of drinks required to experience various effects of alcohol) and reports of blacking out and passing out in the past year.
Participants (925 healthy, underage college student drinkers) completed the Alcohol Sensitivity Questionnaire (ASQ) and reported on their past year blacking out and passing out experiences.
The fit of the ASQ's 2-factor structure was fair (CFI = 0.90, RMSEA = 0.09) in this sample of underage drinkers. In unadjusted models, higher ASQ scores (i.e., requiring more drinks to experience effects, indicating lower alcohol sensitivity) were associated with experiencing more blackouts (IRR = 1.68 [1.31-2.15]) and passing out (IRR = 2.25 [1.59-3.18]) in the past year. After controlling for typical consumption, however, higher ASQ scores were associated with fewer past-year blackouts (IRR = 0.76 [0.60-0.98]). Total ASQ scores moderated the relationship between typical alcohol consumption and blackout occurrence (interaction IRR = 0.96 [0.93-0.98]), but not passing out occurrence (interaction IRR = 0.95 [0.89-1.01]), with the quantity of alcohol consumed more strongly associated with blackout occurrence among higher-sensitivity than lower-sensitivity drinkers.
These findings are consistent with prior work suggesting that low sensitivity may act as a paradoxical risk factor for certain heavy drinking effects, contributing to higher levels of alcohol consumption and more frequent negative consequences while also conferring protection (relative to high-sensitivity peers) at a given level of alcohol exposure.
酒精敏感在断片和昏迷体验中的作用尚未得到充分证实。在这里,我们研究了个体酒精敏感差异(即,体验酒精各种影响所需的饮酒量)与过去一年断片和昏迷报告之间的关系。
参与者(925 名健康的未成年大学生饮酒者)完成了酒精敏感问卷(ASQ),并报告了他们过去一年的断片和昏迷经历。
在这个未成年饮酒者样本中,ASQ 的 2 因素结构的拟合度良好(CFI=0.90,RMSEA=0.09)。在未调整的模型中,较高的 ASQ 评分(即,需要更多的饮酒量才能体验到效果,表明酒精敏感性较低)与过去一年经历更多的断片(IRR=1.68[1.31-2.15])和昏迷(IRR=2.25[1.59-3.18])相关。然而,在控制了典型的饮酒量后,较高的 ASQ 评分与过去一年的断片减少相关(IRR=0.76[0.60-0.98])。总 ASQ 评分调节了典型饮酒量与断片发生之间的关系(交互 IRR=0.96[0.93-0.98]),但与昏迷发生之间的关系不显著(交互 IRR=0.95[0.89-1.01]),在较高敏感性与较低敏感性饮酒者中,酒精摄入量与断片发生的关联性更强。
这些发现与先前的研究一致,表明低敏感性可能是某些重度饮酒影响的矛盾风险因素,导致更高的饮酒量和更频繁的负面后果,同时在给定的酒精暴露水平下提供保护(相对于高敏感性的同龄人)。