School of Public Health, University of Saskatchewan, 104 Clinic Place, Saskatoon, SK S7N 2Z4, Canada.
Environmental Health Unit, Population Health Branch, Ministry of Health, Government of Saskatchewan, 3475 Albert Street, Regina, SK S4S 6X6, Canada.
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Aug;94:103191. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103191. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
The Canadian government has amended the Cannabis Act and Cannabis Regulations to legalize use of recreational cannabis edibles. Besides Canada, the United States of America (U.S.A.) is the only other country with experience regulating cannabis edibles, albeit at the state-level. Because of the potential health risks associated with consuming THC, we sought to compare laws (within Canada and the U.S. states that have legalized the recreational use of cannabis edible) that govern THC-infused cannabis edibles; and to identify any associated gaps in Canada's cannabis regulatory framework.
For all U.S. states with laws on recreational cannabis, state-level statutes and regulations were retrieved from LexisAdvance Quicklaw and compared to requirements contained in the Canadian Cannabis Act, Cannabis Regulations, and gazetted Health Canada regulations. A comparative analysis of these documents highlighted similarities and differences in the cannabis regulatory framework of the two countries.
Currently, twelve jurisdictions in the U.S.A. authorize recreational cannabis use, but only ten states outline specific requirements for edibles. Overall, regulatory requirements for cannabis edibles are largely similar in Canada and the U.S.A.; however, requirements on test result reporting and data collection are different. Canada's limits on per package tetrahydrocannabinol and labelling requirements tend to be more conservative when compared to the U.S.A.
To further prevent accidental consumption, Canada should require cannabis manufacturers to directly imprint edibles with a cannabis symbol, which four American states currently mandate.
加拿大政府修订了《大麻法案》和《大麻法规》,使休闲大麻食用品合法化。除了加拿大,美国是另一个有休闲大麻食用品监管经验的国家,尽管这是在州一级进行的。由于食用四氢大麻酚(THC)可能带来健康风险,我们试图比较加拿大和美国已将休闲大麻合法化的州对含有 THC 的大麻食用品的法律规定;并确定加拿大大麻监管框架中存在的任何相关差距。
我们从 LexisAdvance Quicklaw 检索了所有有休闲大麻法律的美国州的州级法规和法规,并将其与加拿大《大麻法案》、《大麻法规》和加拿大卫生部公布的法规中的要求进行了比较。对这些文件的比较分析突出了两国大麻监管框架的相似之处和差异。
目前,美国有 12 个司法管辖区允许休闲大麻使用,但只有 10 个州对食用品有具体要求。总体而言,加拿大和美国的大麻食用品监管要求基本相似;然而,关于测试结果报告和数据收集的要求有所不同。与美国相比,加拿大对每包四氢大麻酚的限制和标签要求往往更为保守。
为了进一步防止意外食用,加拿大应要求大麻制造商直接在食用品上印上大麻标志,目前美国有四个州已经强制要求这样做。