Suppr超能文献

美国四个州如何监管娱乐用大麻食品。

How four U.S. states are regulating recreational marijuana edibles.

机构信息

RTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.

RTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.

出版信息

Int J Drug Policy. 2017 May;43:83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.01.018. Epub 2017 Mar 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sales of edible marijuana products have been strong in Colorado and Washington State since the legalization of recreational marijuana. Initially, these states did not have comprehensive labelling or packaging requirements in place. In response to increases in marijuana-related emergency room visits and poison control centre calls, additional regulations were implemented. Currently, Alaska, Colorado, Oregon, and Washington each have passed into law various labelling and packaging requirements for edibles.

METHODS

This article presents the primary legal research findings of relevant statutes and regulations for edibles in Alaska, Colorado, Oregon, and Washington. These laws were identified by using Boolean terms and connectors searches in these states' legal databases in LexisNexis.

RESULTS

Alaska, Colorado, Oregon, and Washington vary greatly in how they regulate labelling and packaging. Colorado, Oregon and Washington require a Universal Symbol to be affixed to edibles, but only Oregon and Washington require that the use of pesticides be disclosed on the label. Only Colorado and Oregon require that the packaging for edibles bear a Nutrition Facts Panel on the label. Δ-Tetrahydracannabinol (THC) in a single serving or single edible product as Alaska and Oregon. All four states prohibit the manufacture or packaging of edibles that appeal to youth.

CONCLUSION

State laws governing recreational marijuana edibles have evolved since the first recreational edible products were available for sale. Alaska, Colorado, Oregon, and Washington now require edible product labels to disclose a variety of product information, including risk factors associated with consumption. However, there still remain concerns about the regulatory gaps that exist in each of these states, inherent difficulties in enforcing laws around the labelling, packaging, and manufacturing of edibles, and the outstanding question of whether these edible laws are actually informing consumers and keeping the public safe.

摘要

背景

自娱乐用大麻合法化以来,科罗拉多州和华盛顿州的食用大麻产品销售强劲。最初,这些州没有全面的标签或包装要求。由于与大麻相关的急诊室就诊和中毒控制中心呼叫增加,因此实施了额外的法规。目前,阿拉斯加、科罗拉多州、俄勒冈州和华盛顿州各自通过了关于食用大麻标签和包装的各种法规。

方法

本文介绍了阿拉斯加、科罗拉多州、俄勒冈州和华盛顿州食用大麻相关标签和包装的主要法律研究结果。这些法律是通过在 LexisNexis 中使用这些州法律数据库中的布尔术语和连接器搜索来确定的。

结果

阿拉斯加、科罗拉多州、俄勒冈州和华盛顿州在标签和包装方面差异很大。科罗拉多州、俄勒冈州和华盛顿州要求在食用品上贴上通用符号,但只有俄勒冈州和华盛顿州要求在标签上披露使用农药的情况。只有科罗拉多州和俄勒冈州要求在食用品包装上的标签上贴营养成分表。Δ-四氢大麻酚(THC)在单一服务或单一食用产品中,如阿拉斯加和俄勒冈州。所有四个州都禁止制造或包装吸引年轻人的食用品。

结论

自第一批娱乐用食用产品上市以来,管理娱乐用大麻食用品的州法律已经发生了演变。阿拉斯加、科罗拉多州、俄勒冈州和华盛顿州现在要求食用品标签披露各种产品信息,包括与食用相关的风险因素。然而,每个州仍然存在监管漏洞、标签、包装和制造方面执法的固有困难,以及这些食用品法律是否真的能让消费者了解情况并确保公众安全等问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验