Tyler M. Goodwin, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Medicine Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN.
James P. Davies, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Palmetto Health University of South Carolina Medical Group, Columbia, SC.
Orthop Nurs. 2021;40(2):89-93. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000742.
Tourniquets have been used in the medical setting for centuries and have become the gold standard when preparing patients for surgery, particularly in orthopaedic surgery. Upper extremity tourniquet use improves intraoperative visibility and identification of anatomy. It also decreases blood loss intraoperatively and improves the safety of orthopaedic procedures. Despite the widespread use of tourniquets and differing methods of limb exsanguination, little research has been done quantifying its efficacy. The purpose of this study was to compare gravity exsanguination to Esmarch exsanguination of the upper extremity prior to tourniquet inflation in a large patient sample. A plethysmographic method based on water displacement served as a surrogate for the blood volume exsanguinated. Control measurements of water displacement were obtained from both upper extremities without tourniquet inflation. Water displacement was then measured with both gravity and Esmarch exsanguination techniques. Gender, handedness, height, weight, body mass index, and age were recorded for volunteers and used as covariates. Change in mean water displacement from control (un-exsanguinated) arm and gravity alone measurement was 37.2 ml. Change in mean water displacement between control arm and mean Esmarch measurement was 56.3 ml. Exsanguination using Esmarch compared to gravity alone resulted in a 51.2% increase in blood removal. Only age had a significant interaction effect for the Esmarch method. Analysis revealed that age accounted for 21.4% of all variance in blood exsanguinated using the Esmarch method when compared to the control group. The Esmarch technique was more efficacious for all demographics measured, but most efficacious in subjects who were older than 40 years. This data reaffirms that gravity exsanguination is more efficacious than no tourniquet use at all, and that the Esmarch technique is more efficacious than gravity. To our knowledge, this study is the most robust of its kind to critically and objectively compare upper extremity exsanguination methods and overall tourniquet use by age and supports the common practice of Esmarch exsanguination in orthopaedic extremity surgery.
止血带在医疗环境中已经使用了几个世纪,并且已成为手术准备中(尤其是矫形外科手术)的金标准。上肢止血带的使用提高了手术过程中的可见度和解剖结构的识别度。它还减少了手术中的失血量,并提高了矫形手术的安全性。尽管止血带的使用广泛,并且肢体放血的方法也不同,但很少有研究对其功效进行量化。本研究的目的是在大量患者样本中比较重力放血与 Esmarch 放血在上肢止血带充气前的效果。基于水置换的体积描记法被用作血液排出量的替代指标。在不充气止血带的情况下,从两个上肢获得对照测量的水置换。然后使用重力和 Esmarch 放血技术测量水置换。记录志愿者的性别、惯用手、身高、体重、体重指数和年龄,并将其作为协变量。与对照(未放血)手臂和单独重力测量的平均水置换变化量为 37.2ml。与对照手臂和平均 Esmarch 测量值之间的平均水置换变化量为 56.3ml。与单独重力放血相比,使用 Esmarch 放血可使血液清除率增加 51.2%。仅年龄对 Esmarch 方法有显著的交互作用。分析表明,与对照组相比,Esmarch 方法中年龄占血液排出量总方差的 21.4%。对于所有测量的人群,Esmarch 技术都更有效,但在年龄大于 40 岁的患者中效果最明显。该数据再次证实,与完全不使用止血带相比,重力放血更有效,Esmarch 技术比重力放血更有效。据我们所知,这项研究是最具权威性的同类研究,可对上肢放血方法和整体止血带使用进行严格和客观的比较,并根据年龄支持矫形上肢手术中 Esmarch 放血的常见做法。