Marshall P D, Patil M, Fairclough J A
Cardiff Royal Infirmary, UK.
J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1994 Jun;39(3):189-90.
In order to compare the adequacy of exsanguination produced by Esmarch bandages with that produced by simple elevation for 2 min, a blind randomized prospective trial was undertaken in 50 patients undergoing total knee replacement surgery and 50 patients undergoing knee arthroscopy surgery. The mean blood loss during total knee replacement was significantly greater in the group exsanguinated by elevation (P < 0.01). The haematocrit of samples of the arthroscopy drainage fluid was consistently less than 1%, irrespective of the method of exsanguination used. None of the operating surgeons reported that they considered that either knee replacement surgery or arthroscopic knee surgery had been made any more difficult by the use of elevation as a means of exsanguination. In view of the established risks of using Esmarch bandages, we would suggest that the use of this method of exsanguination in these fields of orthopaedic surgery is not justified.
为比较埃斯马赫绷带放血与单纯抬高肢体2分钟放血的充分性,对50例行全膝关节置换术的患者和50例行膝关节镜手术的患者进行了一项盲法随机前瞻性试验。在全膝关节置换术中,抬高肢体放血组的平均失血量显著更多(P<0.01)。无论采用何种放血方法,关节镜引流液样本的血细胞比容始终低于1%。没有一位手术医生报告说,他们认为使用抬高肢体作为放血手段会使膝关节置换手术或膝关节镜手术变得更困难。鉴于使用埃斯马赫绷带存在既定风险,我们建议在这些骨科手术领域使用这种放血方法是不合理的。