• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国深圳老年人接种双联流感和肺炎球菌疫苗的成本效益分析。

Cost-effectiveness of dual influenza and pneumococcal vaccination among the elderly in Shenzhen, China.

机构信息

School of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518107, Guangdong, China.

Shenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2021 Apr 15;39(16):2237-2245. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.041. Epub 2021 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.041
PMID:33757667
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the cost-effectiveness of dual influenza and pneumococcal vaccination for the elderly in Shenzhen, China.

METHODS

A Markov state-transition model with a weekly cycle was developed to compare the outcomes of dual influenza and pneumococcal vaccination for the prevention of influenza and pneumococcal infections compared with no vaccination among 70-74 years old people in Shenzhen over 5 years. The model allowed seasonal variation of influenza activity. We calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) with costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) discounted at 5% annually from the societal perspective. The impact of parameter uncertainty on the results was examined using one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA).

RESULTS

In the base case, dual vaccination prevented 5042 influenza infections, 26 IPD cases, 3 disabilities, 34 deaths, and cost US$7.1 per person while resulting in a net gain of 0.0026 QALYs compared with no vaccination. Using once the Chinese gross domestic product per capita in 2019 (US$10,289) as the willingness-to-pay threshold, dual vaccination was cost-effective with an ICER of US$2699 per QALY gained. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that the ICER was relatively sensitive to changes in influenza attack rates and influenza vaccine effectiveness. Based on the results of PSA with 1000 Monte Carlo simulations, receiving both vaccines was cost-effective in 100% of the repetitions.

CONCLUSION

The current study provides evidence that dual influenza and pneumococcal vaccination is a cost-effective disease prevention strategy for the elderly in Shenzhen, China.

摘要

目的

评估在中国深圳为老年人进行流感和肺炎球菌联合疫苗接种的成本效益。

方法

采用每周循环的马尔可夫状态转移模型,比较了在中国深圳为 70-74 岁老年人接种流感和肺炎球菌联合疫苗与不接种疫苗预防流感和肺炎球菌感染的结果,模型允许流感活动的季节性变化。我们从社会角度计算了增量成本效益比(ICER),成本和质量调整生命年(QALY)以每年 5%贴现。使用单因素敏感性分析(Sensitivity Analysis)和概率敏感性分析(PSA)来检查参数不确定性对结果的影响。

结果

在基础情况下,联合疫苗接种预防了 5042 例流感感染、26 例侵袭性肺炎球菌病(IPD)病例、3 例残疾、34 例死亡,且每人花费 7.1 美元,与不接种疫苗相比,净获得 0.0026 个 QALY。在中国 2019 年人均国内生产总值(GDP)(10289 美元)作为支付意愿阈值,接种两种疫苗的增量成本效益比为每获得一个 QALY 需花费 2699 美元。单因素敏感性分析表明,ICER 对流感发病率和流感疫苗有效性的变化相对敏感。基于 PSA 的 1000 次蒙特卡罗模拟结果,两种疫苗均接种在 100%的重复中是具有成本效益的。

结论

本研究提供了证据表明,在中国深圳,流感和肺炎球菌联合疫苗接种是一种针对老年人的具有成本效益的疾病预防策略。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of dual influenza and pneumococcal vaccination among the elderly in Shenzhen, China.中国深圳老年人接种双联流感和肺炎球菌疫苗的成本效益分析。
Vaccine. 2021 Apr 15;39(16):2237-2245. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.041. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
2
[Based on a Markov model, cost-effectiveness analysis of influenza vaccination among people aged 60 years and older in Shenzhen].[基于马尔可夫模型的深圳市60岁及以上人群流感疫苗接种成本效益分析]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Jul 10;43(7):1140-1146. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20211221-01005.
3
[Cost-effective analysis of seasonal influenza vaccine in elderly Chinese population].[中国老年人群季节性流感疫苗的成本效益分析]
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Oct 6;53(10):993-999. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2019.10.008.
4
Cost-effectiveness analysis of influenza and pneumococcal vaccination for Hong Kong elderly in long-term care facilities.对香港长期护理机构老年人进行流感和肺炎球菌疫苗接种的成本效益分析。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 Nov;63(11):906-11. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.081885. Epub 2009 Jul 15.
5
The cost-effectiveness of starting 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine and influenza vaccination at 50 vs. 65 years: A comparative modelling study.50 岁与 65 岁开始接种 23 价肺炎球菌多糖疫苗和流感疫苗的成本效益比较:一项建模研究。
Vaccine. 2022 Feb 23;40(9):1282-1288. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.01.033. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
6
Influenza vaccination for heart failure patients: a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of Chinese healthcare system.心力衰竭患者的流感疫苗接种:中国医疗体系视角下的成本效益分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 9;12:1348207. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1348207. eCollection 2024.
7
Cost-effectiveness of quadrivalent versus trivalent influenza vaccine for elderly population in China.四价流感疫苗与三价流感疫苗在中国老年人群中的成本效益比较。
Vaccine. 2020 Jan 29;38(5):1057-1064. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.11.045. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
8
Implementing an influenza vaccination programme for adults aged ≥65 years in Poland: a cost-effectiveness analysis.在波兰为≥65 岁老年人实施流感疫苗接种计划:成本效益分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2012 Feb 1;32(2):73-85. doi: 10.2165/11594030-000000000-00000.
9
Retrospective cost-effectiveness of the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination program in Australia.澳大利亚 23 价肺炎球菌多糖疫苗接种计划的回顾性成本效益分析。
Vaccine. 2018 Oct 8;36(42):6307-6313. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.08.084. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of quadrivalent influenza vaccination in at-risk adults and the elderly: an updated analysis in the U.K.高危成年人及老年人中四价流感疫苗接种的成本效益分析:英国的最新分析
J Med Econ. 2015;18(9):746-61. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1044456. Epub 2015 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimization of Elderly Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunization Programs in Beijing, China Using Health Economic Evaluations: A Modeling Study.利用卫生经济评估优化中国北京老年人流感和肺炎球菌免疫规划:一项建模研究
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Jan 11;11(1):161. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11010161.
2
Immunogenicity and safety of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (Sinopharm BBIBP-CorV) coadministered with quadrivalent split-virion inactivated influenza vaccine and 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in China: A multicentre, non-inferiority, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 4 trial.在中国,一种灭活的 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗(国药 BBIBP-CorV)与四价裂解流感疫苗和 23 价肺炎球菌多糖疫苗联合接种的免疫原性和安全性:一项多中心、非劣效性、开放性、随机、对照、四期临床试验。
Vaccine. 2022 Aug 26;40(36):5322-5332. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.07.033. Epub 2022 Jul 29.