School of Biological and Pharmaceutical Science, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, China.
School of Art & Design, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, China.
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 9;12:1348207. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1348207. eCollection 2024.
Influenza infection induces cardiovascular events in heart failure (HF) patients, with potential risk reduction through vaccination. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of influenza vaccination for HF patients in China.
We developed a Markov model with a 3-month cycle to simulate the cost-effectiveness of administering the influenza vaccine to patients with HF over a 3-year period. Patients in the model received either the influenza vaccine or a placebo, in addition to standard HF treatment. Cost data, sourced from the China Healthcare Statistic Yearbook and other public records, and effectiveness data from the IVVE (Influenza Vaccine to Prevent Adverse Vascular Events in HF) trial, were incorporated. Specifically, the cost of the influenza vaccine was 75 Chinese Yuan (CNY) (11 USD), the cost of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) was 9,326 CNY (1,386 USD), and the cost of treatment for pneumonia was 5,984 CNY (889 USD). The study's primary outcome, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), quantifies the incremental cost (CNY and USD) per incremental quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Additional outcomes included total cost, total effectiveness, incremental cost, and incremental effectiveness. We conducted one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) to assess certainty and uncertainty, respectively. Scenario analysis, considering various situations, was performed to evaluate the robustness of the results.
In the base case analysis, influenza vaccine, compared to placebo, among Chinese HF patients, resulted in a cost increase from 21,004 CNY (3,121 USD) to 21,062 CNY (3,130 USD) and in QALYs from 1.89 to 1.92 (2.55 life years vs. 2.57 life years) per patient. The resulting ICER was 2,331 CNY (346 USD) per QALY [2,080 CNY (309 USD) per life year], falling below the willingness-to-pay threshold based on per capita GDP. One-way sensitivity analysis revealed that disparities in HHF and cardiovascular death rates between groups had the most significant impact on the ICER, while the cost of vaccines had a marginal impact. PSA and scenario analysis collectively affirmed the robustness of our findings.
This study suggests that adding the influenza vaccine to standard treatment regimens for Chinese patients with HF may represent a highly cost-effective option. Further real-world data studies are essential to validate these findings.
流感感染可导致心力衰竭(HF)患者发生心血管事件,通过疫苗接种可降低潜在风险。本研究旨在评估在中国 HF 患者中接种流感疫苗的成本效益。
我们开发了一个 3 个月为一个周期的 Markov 模型,以模拟在 3 年内对 HF 患者接种流感疫苗的成本效益。模型中的患者除了接受标准 HF 治疗外,还接受流感疫苗或安慰剂治疗。成本数据来源于《中国卫生统计年鉴》和其他公共记录,有效性数据来源于 IVVE(流感疫苗预防 HF 不良血管事件)试验。具体而言,流感疫苗的费用为 75 元人民币(11 美元),HF 住院费用为 9326 元人民币(1386 美元),肺炎治疗费用为 5984 元人民币(889 美元)。研究的主要结果是增量成本效益比(ICER),量化了每增加一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本(元人民币和美元)。其他结果包括总成本、总效果、增量成本和增量效果。我们进行了单因素和概率敏感性分析(PSA),分别评估确定性和不确定性。情景分析考虑了各种情况,以评估结果的稳健性。
在基线分析中,与安慰剂相比,中国 HF 患者接种流感疫苗会导致成本从 21004 元人民币(3121 美元)增加到 21062 元人民币(3130 美元),每位患者的 QALY 从 1.89 增加到 1.92(2.55 生命年比 2.57 生命年)。由此产生的 ICER 为每 QALY 2331 元人民币(346 美元)[每生命年 2080 元人民币(309 美元)],低于基于人均 GDP 的意愿支付阈值。单因素敏感性分析表明,组间 HF 和心血管死亡率的差异对 ICER 的影响最大,而疫苗成本的影响则较小。PSA 和情景分析共同证实了我们研究结果的稳健性。
本研究表明,在中国 HF 患者的标准治疗方案中添加流感疫苗可能是一种极具成本效益的选择。进一步的真实世界数据研究对于验证这些发现至关重要。