Suppr超能文献

重度哮喘附加药物治疗的患者体验:一项质性描述性研究。

The Patients' Experience of Severe Asthma Add-On Pharmacotherapies: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.

作者信息

Clark Vanessa L, Gibson Peter G, McDonald Vanessa M

机构信息

National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence in Severe Asthma and the Priority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs, The University of Newcastle, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia.

School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Newcastle, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

J Asthma Allergy. 2021 Mar 15;14:245-258. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S296147. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Add-on therapies for severe asthma are continually emerging with proven efficacy in randomised controlled trials. To date, however, there are no qualitative studies exploring patients' experiences with these treatments. We aimed to understand the experience of patients who were treated with an add-on therapy for their severe asthma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A qualitative descriptive study was conducted, participants were recruited from the respiratory clinics and databases of a tertiary referral hospital. Participants with treatment-refractory severe asthma (n=20) prescribed an add-on therapy for >4 months (75% mepolizumab; 25% omalizumab, and 25% macrolide) were recruited. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted, with interviews thematically analysed.

RESULTS

Participants' mean (SD) age was 59.5 (15.3) years, and 50% were male. Participants reported 4.5 (2.3) exacerbations in the past year. Asthma Control Questionnaire score was 2.0 (1.4). The monoclonal add-on therapies had been prescribed for a median (IQR) of 12.5 (7.0, 24.0) months. Experience was captured in four emergent themes: "Life is just easier" provided an overall message that the add-on therapy made the participants' life easier in terms of increasing participation, levelling out symptoms, providing more energy and reducing healthcare use. "Prednisone: A necessary evil" was discussed, particularly in terms of dose and dependence and damaging side effects. The theme "worry and hope for the future" referenced treatment non-response or cessation of effect which was discussed by some participants. Finally, "holistic care" was centred on the sentiment that the participant's asthma management and overall health were not related to one aspect or medication alone.

CONCLUSION

Patients with severe asthma experience vast improvements in quality-of-life and life participation with add-on therapies, but there remains a significant burden related to oral corticosteroids and incomplete treatment responses. Addressing this residual burden is an important area for future research.

摘要

目的

用于重度哮喘的附加疗法不断涌现,在随机对照试验中已证实具有疗效。然而,迄今为止,尚无定性研究探讨患者对这些治疗方法的体验。我们旨在了解接受附加疗法治疗重度哮喘的患者的体验。

患者与方法

进行了一项定性描述性研究,参与者从一家三级转诊医院的呼吸诊所和数据库中招募。招募了20名患有治疗难治性重度哮喘且接受附加疗法治疗超过4个月的参与者(75%使用美泊利单抗;25%使用奥马珠单抗,25%使用大环内酯类药物)。进行了定性半结构化访谈,并对访谈内容进行了主题分析。

结果

参与者的平均(标准差)年龄为59.5(15.3)岁,50%为男性。参与者报告在过去一年中有4.5(2.3)次哮喘发作。哮喘控制问卷评分为2.0(1.4)。单克隆附加疗法的使用时间中位数(四分位间距)为12.5(7.0,24.0)个月。体验归纳为四个新出现的主题:“生活更轻松”传达了一个总体信息,即附加疗法在增加参与度、缓解症状、提供更多精力和减少医疗保健使用方面使参与者的生活更轻松。讨论了“泼尼松:一种必要的恶”,特别是在剂量、依赖性和有害副作用方面。“对未来的担忧与希望”这一主题涉及一些参与者讨论的治疗无反应或疗效终止的情况。最后,“整体护理”的核心观点是,参与者的哮喘管理和整体健康并非仅与某一个方面或药物相关。

结论

重度哮喘患者通过附加疗法在生活质量和生活参与度方面有显著改善,但与口服糖皮质激素相关的负担仍然很大,且治疗反应不完全。解决这一残留负担是未来研究的一个重要领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e2a/7979352/72726bdc8a7d/JAA-14-245-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验