Archie J P
Wake Medical Center, Raleigh, NC.
South Med J. 1988 Jun;81(6):707-10. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198806000-00006.
It is generally accepted that training and experience are necessary to obtain acceptably low perioperative mortality and permanent neurologic morbidity for carotid endarterectomy. To test this hypothesis I analyzed the results of 600 consecutive primary carotid endarterectomies that I performed over a 13-year period beginning with my senior residency. The overall hospital mortality was 9/600 (1.5%), the permanent neurologic morbidity 11/600 (1.8%), and the combined mortality and permanent neurologic morbidity 20/600 (3.3%). The mortality for the first 300 operations was 6/300 (2%) (4/6 from stroke) and for the last 300, 3/300 (1%) (3/3 cardiac). All 11 nonfatal strokes occurred in the first 300 operations. Morbidity and mortality decreased with both cumulative experience and the number of operations done per year. While it is difficult to separate the effect of these two factors, the results suggest that both may be important in obtaining a combined perioperative mortality and permanent neurologic deficit below 3%.
人们普遍认为,要使颈动脉内膜切除术的围手术期死亡率和永久性神经功能障碍发生率低到可接受的程度,培训和经验是必不可少的。为了验证这一假设,我分析了从我高级住院医师培训开始的13年期间我连续进行的600例原发性颈动脉内膜切除术的结果。总体医院死亡率为9/600(1.5%),永久性神经功能障碍发生率为11/600(1.8%),死亡率和永久性神经功能障碍发生率合并为20/600(3.3%)。前300例手术的死亡率为6/300(2%)(6例中有4例死于中风),后300例手术的死亡率为3/300(1%)(3例均死于心脏疾病)。所有11例非致命性中风均发生在前300例手术中。发病率和死亡率随着累积经验和每年手术例数的增加而降低。虽然很难区分这两个因素的影响,但结果表明,两者对于使围手术期死亡率和永久性神经功能缺损合并发生率低于3%可能都很重要。