Zurbruegg H R, Seiler R W, Grolimund P, Mattle H
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1987;84(1-2):3-12. doi: 10.1007/BF01456344.
A review of the mortality and morbidity of carotid endarterectomy reported during the last 10 years was made and compared to the risk of carotid stenosis managed by the best medical treatment. For comparison, the patients were classified in asymptomatic patients (grade I), patients with transient ischaemic attacks (grade II), patients with ischaemic neurological deficits operated on acutely (grade III) and into patients with no or incomplete recovery 4-6 weeks after the stroke (grade IV). Based on the results of this literature review, only patients in grade II seem to benefit from carotid endarterectomy.
对过去10年报道的颈动脉内膜切除术的死亡率和发病率进行了回顾,并与采用最佳药物治疗的颈动脉狭窄风险进行了比较。为了进行比较,将患者分为无症状患者(I级)、短暂性脑缺血发作患者(II级)、急性接受手术治疗的缺血性神经功能缺损患者(III级)以及中风后4-6周无恢复或恢复不完全的患者(IV级)。根据这篇文献综述的结果,似乎只有II级患者能从颈动脉内膜切除术中获益。