Herman Jonathan D, Wang Chuangqi, Loos Carolin, Yoon Hyunah, Rivera Johanna, Dieterle M Eugenia, Haslwanter Denise, Jangra Rohit K, Bortz Robert H, Bar Katharine J, Julg Boris, Chandran Kartik, Lauffenburger Douglas, Pirofski Liise-Anne, Alter Galit
Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT, and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Division of Infectious Disease, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
medRxiv. 2021 Mar 11:2021.03.08.21253157. doi: 10.1101/2021.03.08.21253157.
In the absence of an effective vaccine or monoclonal therapeutic, transfer of convalescent plasma (CCP) was proposed early in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic as an easily accessible therapy. However, despite the global excitement around this historically valuable therapeutic approach, results from CCP trials have been mixed and highly debated. Unlike other therapeutic interventions, CCP represents a heterogeneous drug. Each CCP unit is unique and collected from an individual recovered COVID-19 patient, making the interpretation of therapeutic benefit more complicated. While the prevailing view in the field would suggest that it is administration of neutralizing antibodies via CCP that centrally provides therapeutic benefit to newly infected COVID-19 patients, many hospitalized COVID-19 patients already possess neutralizing antibodies. Importantly, the therapeutic benefit of antibodies can extend far beyond their simple ability to bind and block infection, especially related to their ability to interact with the innate immune system. In our work we deeply profiled the SARS-CoV-2-specific Fc-response in CCP donors, along with the recipients prior to and after CCP transfer, revealing striking SARS-CoV-2 specific Fc-heterogeneity across CCP units and their recipients. However, CCP units possessed more functional antibodies than acute COVID-19 patients, that shaped the evolution of COVID-19 patient humoral profiles via distinct immunomodulatory effects that varied by pre-existing SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S)-specific IgG titers in the patients. Our analysis identified surprising influence of both S and Nucleocapsid (N) specific antibody functions not only in direct antiviral activity but also in anti-inflammatory effects. These findings offer insights for more comprehensive interpretation of correlates of immunity in ongoing large scale CCP trials and for the design of next generation therapeutic design.
在缺乏有效疫苗或单克隆治疗药物的情况下,恢复期血浆(CCP)输注在新冠疫情早期就被提出作为一种易于获取的治疗方法。然而,尽管这种具有历史价值的治疗方法在全球引起了广泛关注,但CCP试验的结果却参差不齐,引发了激烈的争论。与其他治疗干预措施不同,CCP是一种异质性药物。每个CCP单位都是独特的,是从一名康复的新冠肺炎患者身上采集的,这使得对治疗效果的解读更加复杂。虽然该领域的主流观点认为,通过CCP输注中和抗体能为新感染的新冠肺炎患者提供核心治疗益处,但许多住院的新冠肺炎患者已经拥有中和抗体。重要的是,抗体的治疗益处远不止于其简单的结合和阻断感染的能力,特别是与其与先天免疫系统相互作用的能力有关。在我们的研究中,我们深入分析了CCP供体中针对新冠病毒的Fc反应,以及CCP输注前后受体的反应,揭示了CCP单位及其受体之间存在显著的新冠病毒特异性Fc异质性。然而,CCP单位比急性新冠肺炎患者拥有更多功能性抗体,这些抗体通过不同的免疫调节作用塑造了新冠肺炎患者体液谱的演变,这些作用因患者先前存在的新冠病毒刺突(S)特异性IgG滴度而异。我们的分析确定了S和核衣壳(N)特异性抗体功能不仅在直接抗病毒活性方面,而且在抗炎作用方面都有惊人的影响。这些发现为正在进行的大规模CCP试验中更全面地解释免疫相关性以及下一代治疗设计提供了见解。