Suppr超能文献

COVID-19 恢复期血浆中的抗 SARS-CoV-2 IgG 和 IgA 抗体不会增强病毒感染。

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgA antibodies in COVID-19 convalescent plasma do not enhance viral infection.

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.

American Red Cross, Washington, DC, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Mar 8;17(3):e0257930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257930. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

The novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2 that causes COVID-19 has resulted in the death of nearly 4 million people within the last 18 months. While preventive vaccination, and monoclonal antibody therapies have been rapidly developed and deployed, early in the pandemic the use of COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) was a common means of passive immunization with a theoretical risk of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of viral infection. Though vaccines elicit a strong and protective immune response and transfusion of CCP with high titers of neutralization activity are correlated with better clinical outcomes, the question of whether antibodies in CCP can enhance infection of SARS-CoV-2 has not been directly addressed. In this study, we analyzed for and observed passive transfer of neutralization activity with CCP transfusion. Furthermore, to specifically understand if antibodies against the spike protein (S) enhance infection, we measured the anti-S IgG, IgA, and IgM responses and adapted retroviral-pseudotypes to measure virus neutralization with target cells expressing the ACE2 virus receptor and the Fc alpha receptor (FcαR) or Fc gamma receptor IIA (FcγRIIA). Whereas neutralizing activity of CCP correlated best with higher titers of anti-S IgG antibodies, the neutralizing titer was not affected when Fc receptors were present on target cells. These observations support the absence of antibody-dependent enhancement of infection (ADE) by IgG and IgA isotypes found in CCP. The results presented, therefore, not only supports the therapeutic use of currently available antibody-based treatment, including the continuation of CCP transfusion strategies, but also the use of various vaccine platforms in a prophylactic approach.

摘要

新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)引发的 COVID-19 在过去 18 个月内导致近 400 万人死亡。虽然预防性疫苗接种和单克隆抗体疗法已迅速开发和部署,但在大流行早期,使用 COVID-19 恢复期血浆(CCP)是一种常见的被动免疫手段,理论上存在病毒感染的抗体依赖性增强(ADE)风险。尽管疫苗可引发强烈和保护性的免疫反应,并且 CCP 中高滴度中和活性的输血与更好的临床结果相关,但 CCP 中的抗体是否会增强 SARS-CoV-2 的感染尚未得到直接解决。在这项研究中,我们分析并观察了 CCP 输血的被动转移中和活性。此外,为了专门了解针对刺突蛋白(S)的抗体是否增强感染,我们测量了抗 S IgG、IgA 和 IgM 反应,并采用逆转录病毒假型来测量与表达 ACE2 病毒受体和 Fcα受体(FcαR)或 Fcγ受体 IIA(FcγRIIA)的靶细胞结合的中和活性。虽然 CCP 的中和活性与更高滴度的抗 S IgG 抗体密切相关,但当靶细胞上存在 Fc 受体时,中和滴度不受影响。这些观察结果支持 CCP 中发现的 IgG 和 IgA 同种型不存在抗体依赖性增强感染(ADE)。因此,提出的结果不仅支持目前可用的基于抗体的治疗方法的治疗用途,包括继续进行 CCP 输血策略,还支持在预防性方法中使用各种疫苗平台。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d42b/8903276/cf3350932752/pone.0257930.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验