• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用模拟患者评估康复需求评估(NiRA)的可靠性。

Evaluating the Reliability of the Needs in Recovery Assessment (NiRA) with Simulated Patients.

机构信息

Adelaide Nursing School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia.

Clinical and Health Services, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia.

出版信息

Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Sep;42(9):845-854. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2021.1894618. Epub 2021 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1080/01612840.2021.1894618
PMID:33759706
Abstract

The Needs in Recovery Assessment (NiRA) is a tool designed to support recovery-oriented and person-centred approaches in mental health services through facilitating the identification and prioritisation of needs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the interrater reliability of the NiRA. Ten mental health clinicians from various professional backgrounds used the NiRA to facilitate assessment interviews with Simulated Patients. Completed and semi-completed NiRA forms, questionnaires, and audio-visual recordings of assessment interviews were collected for analysis. The interrater reliability of the NiRA was calculated using percent agreement and Gwet's Agreement Coefficient (AC). Percent agreement across all items of the finalised tool was 0.84 (item range: 0.55 to 1.0). Overall interrater reliability (Gwet's AC) was 0.70 (95% CI 0.64-0.76) with items ranging from -0.08 to 1.0. The NiRA is a reliable tool and is ready to be trialled in a feasibility study in clinical settings. It is anticipated that the NiRA will facilitate a deeper understanding of service users' needs and a more targeted approach to meeting unmet needs.

摘要

需求评估工具(NiRA)旨在通过促进需求的识别和优先级排序,支持精神卫生服务中的以康复为导向和以患者为中心的方法。本研究旨在评估 NiRA 的评分者间信度。10 名来自不同专业背景的精神卫生临床医生使用 NiRA 对模拟患者进行评估访谈。收集了完成和未完成的 NiRA 表格、问卷以及评估访谈的音频-视频记录进行分析。使用百分比一致性和 Gwet 一致性系数(AC)计算 NiRA 的评分者间信度。最终工具的所有项目的百分比一致性为 0.84(项目范围:0.55-1.0)。总体评分者间信度(Gwet 的 AC)为 0.70(95%CI 0.64-0.76),项目范围从-0.08 到 1.0。NiRA 是一种可靠的工具,已准备好在临床环境中进行可行性研究。预计 NiRA 将有助于更深入地了解服务使用者的需求,并采取更有针对性的方法来满足未满足的需求。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Reliability of the Needs in Recovery Assessment (NiRA) with Simulated Patients.用模拟患者评估康复需求评估(NiRA)的可靠性。
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Sep;42(9):845-854. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2021.1894618. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
2
Introducing the Needs in Recovery Assessment (NiRA) into clinical practice: protocol for a pilot study investigating the formal and systematic assessment of clinical and social needs experienced by service users at a tertiary, metropolitan mental health service.将康复需求评估(NiRA)引入临床实践:一项试点研究的方案,该研究旨在对三级都市精神卫生服务机构中服务使用者所经历的临床和社会需求进行正式且系统的评估。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Sep 30;7(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00919-8.
3
Development and validation of the Needs in Recovery Assessment (NiRA): A clinical tool for assessing the needs of individuals recovering from a first episode of mental illness.需要恢复评估量表(NiRA)的编制与验证:一种评估首发精神疾病患者康复需求的临床工具
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Aug;29(4):639-651. doi: 10.1111/inm.12697. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
4
Reliability of the Camberwell Assessment of Need for South African mental health service users.南非精神卫生服务使用者坎伯韦尔需求评估的可靠性。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2012 Jan;58(1):47-54. doi: 10.1177/0020764010382700. Epub 2010 Sep 8.
5
The Longer-term Unmet Needs after Stroke Questionnaire: Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Concurrent Validity in a Dutch Population.中风后长期未满足需求问卷:荷兰人群中的跨文化适应、信度和同时效度
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 Jan;27(1):267-275. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.08.043. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
6
A comparison of Cohen's Kappa and Gwet's AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples.科恩氏 κ系数与格瓦特氏 AC1 系数在计算评定者间信度系数时的比较:一项对人格障碍样本进行的研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Apr 29;13:61. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-61.
7
Measuring test-retest reliability (TRR) of AMSTAR provides moderate to perfect agreement - a contribution to the discussion of the importance of TRR in relation to the psychometric properties of assessment tools.测量 AMSTAR 的重测信度(TRR)提供了从中等到极好的一致性 - 这有助于讨论 TRR 相对于评估工具的心理测量特性的重要性。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Mar 11;21(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01231-y.
8
Reliability of the Camberwell Assessment of Need--European Version. EPSILON Study 6. European Psychiatric Services: Inputs Linked to Outcome Domains and Needs.《坎伯韦尔需求评估量表——欧洲版》的信效度。EPSILON研究6。欧洲精神科服务:与结果领域和需求相关的投入。
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 2000(39):s34-40. doi: 10.1192/bjp.177.39.s34.
9
Professionals' views on mental health service users' education: challenges and support.专业人士对精神卫生服务使用者教育的看法:挑战与支持
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Feb;24(1):57-68. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12355.
10
Acceptability and Reliability of a Novel Palliative Care Screening Tool Among Emergency Department Providers.新型姑息治疗筛查工具在急诊科医护人员中的可接受性和可靠性
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Jun;23(6):694-702. doi: 10.1111/acem.12963. Epub 2016 May 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Introducing the Needs in Recovery Assessment (NiRA) into clinical practice: protocol for a pilot study investigating the formal and systematic assessment of clinical and social needs experienced by service users at a tertiary, metropolitan mental health service.将康复需求评估(NiRA)引入临床实践:一项试点研究的方案,该研究旨在对三级都市精神卫生服务机构中服务使用者所经历的临床和社会需求进行正式且系统的评估。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Sep 30;7(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00919-8.