Bosch-Boesjes J E
Vakgroep Burgerlijk Recht en Burgerlijk Procesrecht van de Juridische Faculteit, R.U. Groningen.
Tijdschr Diergeneeskd. 1988 May 15;113(10):550-5.
With reference to legal principles such as freedom of contract and freedom of labour, it is examined whether a non-restraint of trade agreed upon with a (female) veterinary surgeon married to a veterinarian is legally operative in view of the fact that this contract in restraint of trade is not based on any legal relationship. This leads to the conclusion that arguments may be advanced, which cast doubt on the legality of these contracts. This does not imply that now the cause is open to the free setting up of a practice by the veterinarian married to a veterinary surgeon. It is briefly stated for which reasons possible competition may be unlawful in this case, so that the veterinarian will be liable in damages when damage has been sustained. In conclusion, attention is drawn to a number of other legal problems, bearing all these stipulations.
参照契约自由和劳动自由等法律原则，鉴于与兽医结婚的（女性）兽医所达成的竞业禁止协议并非基于任何法律关系，故探讨该协议是否具有法律效力。由此得出结论，可能会有人提出质疑这些协议合法性的论据。但这并不意味着与兽医结婚的兽医现在就可以自由开设诊所。文中简要阐述了在此种情况下可能构成非法竞争的原因，因此，如果造成了损害，该兽医将承担损害赔偿责任。最后，文中提请注意涉及所有这些规定的一些其他法律问题。
