Jones Raymond, Credeur Daniel P, McCoy Stephanie M
School of Kinesiology and Nutrition, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, Mississippi, USA.
Department of Biology, Ave Maria University, Ave Maria, Florida, USA.
J Am Coll Health. 2023 Feb-Mar;71(2):600-606. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2021.1899189. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
This study sought to determine the relationship between occupational sitting and work engagement among university employees. Participants included 103 university employees (age: 48.5 ± 10.4 years, 80% female, 77% staff). : Participants completed an online survey based on the Utrecht Work Engagement Survey (UWES) and the Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire (OSPAQ). The UWES assessed elements of work engagement. The OSPAQ assessed time spent sitting, standing, walking, and in heavy labor during a workday. : Compared to staff members, faculty members self-reported less time seated during the workday (373.8 ± 109.7 min/day vs. 321.1 ± 97.3 min/day, = 0.03). Work engagement was comparable among faculty and staff members (vigor: = 0.44; absorption: = 0.68; dedication: = 0.71). Associations of work engagement with occupational sitting were not significant. : These pilot findings suggest that university staff tend to engage in more occupational sitting compared to faculty. Being absorbed and engaged at work is not associated with occupational sitting.
本研究旨在确定大学员工的职业久坐与工作投入之间的关系。参与者包括103名大学员工（年龄：48.5±10.4岁，80%为女性，77%为职员）。参与者完成了一项基于乌得勒支工作投入量表（UWES）和职业久坐与身体活动问卷（OSPAQ）的在线调查。UWES评估工作投入的要素。OSPAQ评估工作日期间坐着、站立、行走和从事重体力劳动的时间。与职员相比，教员自我报告的工作日久坐时间较少（373.8±109.7分钟/天对321.1±97.3分钟/天，=0.03）。教员和职员之间的工作投入相当（活力：=0.44；专注：=0.68；奉献：=0.71）。工作投入与职业久坐之间的关联不显著。这些初步研究结果表明，与教员相比，大学职员往往职业久坐时间更长。在工作中专注和投入与职业久坐无关。
