• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人与腹腔镜手术治疗胃空肠溃疡穿孔的比较:44 例回顾性队列研究。

Emergent robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for perforated gastrojejunal ulcers: a retrospective cohort study of 44 patients.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Albany Medical Center, 43 New Scotland Avenue, Albany, NY, 12208, USA.

Albany Medical College, 43 New Scotland Avenue, Albany, NY, 12208, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2022 Feb;36(2):1573-1577. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08447-5. Epub 2021 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-021-08447-5
PMID:33760973
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Perforated gastrojejunal ulcers are a known complication following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery requiring emergent surgical repair. The robotic approach has not been evaluated for emergency general surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study from 2015 to 2019 was performed identifying all patients who underwent repair of perforated gastrojejunal ulcers after RYGB at a single institution. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared by robotic or laparoscopic approach.

RESULTS

Of the 44 patients analyzed, there were 24 robotic and 20 laparoscopic repairs of perforated gastrojejunal ulcers. No patients were initially approached with open surgery. In-room-to-surgery-start time was significantly faster in the robotic group than the laparoscopic group (25 versus 31 min, p = 0.01). Complication rate, complication severity, operating time, hospital length of stay, postoperative vasopressor requirement, discharge to home, hospital length of stay and 30-day readmission were all improved in the robotic group, although these were not statistically significant. Both total inpatient and procedural costs were more in the robotic group than the laparoscopic group.

CONCLUSION

Perforated hollow viscus is not a contraindication for the use of the surgical robot, which may improve outcomes.

摘要

背景

胃旁路术后(RYGB)发生穿孔性胃肠溃疡是一种已知的并发症,需要紧急手术修复。机器人手术在急诊普通外科中尚未得到评估。

方法

对 2015 年至 2019 年期间在一家机构接受 RYGB 后穿孔性胃肠溃疡修复的所有患者进行了回顾性队列研究。通过机器人或腹腔镜方法比较患者特征和结果。

结果

在分析的 44 名患者中,有 24 名接受了机器人手术修复,20 名接受了腹腔镜手术修复。没有患者最初采用开放性手术。机器人组的手术开始时间明显快于腹腔镜组(25 分钟与 31 分钟,p=0.01)。机器人组的并发症发生率、并发症严重程度、手术时间、住院时间、术后血管加压素需求、出院回家、住院时间和 30 天再入院率均有所改善,尽管这些差异没有统计学意义。机器人组的总住院和手术费用均高于腹腔镜组。

结论

穿孔性空腔脏器不是使用手术机器人的禁忌症,它可能改善结果。

相似文献

1
Emergent robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for perforated gastrojejunal ulcers: a retrospective cohort study of 44 patients.机器人与腹腔镜手术治疗胃空肠溃疡穿孔的比较:44 例回顾性队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Feb;36(2):1573-1577. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08447-5. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
2
The Impact of Robotics in Learning Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Retrospective Analysis of 214 Laparoscopic and Robotic Procedures : Robotic Vs. Laparoscopic RYGB.机器人技术在 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术学习中的影响:214 例腹腔镜和机器人手术的回顾性分析:机器人与腹腔镜 RYGB。
Obes Surg. 2020 Jun;30(6):2403-2410. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04508-1.
3
Robotic "Double Loop" Roux-en-Y gastric bypass reduces the risk of postoperative internal hernias: a prospective observational study.机器人“双环” Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术降低术后内疝风险:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Aug;35(8):4200-4205. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07901-0. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
4
Robot-assisted gastrojejunal anastomosis does not improve the results of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.机器人辅助胃空肠吻合术并不改善腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Feb;25(2):597-603. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1229-1. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
5
Australian experience with robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with comparison to a conventional laparoscopic series.澳大利亚机器人辅助 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术的经验与传统腹腔镜系列的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jun;36(6):4025-4031. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08723-4. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
6
Incidence of perforated gastrojejunal anastomotic ulcers after laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity and role of laparoscopy in their management.腹腔镜胃旁路术治疗病态肥胖后胃空肠吻合口溃疡穿孔的发生率及腹腔镜在其治疗中的作用。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012 Jul-Aug;8(4):423-8. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.06.008. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
7
Robotic platform for gastric bypass is associated with more resource utilization: an analysis of MBSAQIP dataset.机器人辅助胃旁路术平台与更多资源利用相关:MBSAQIP 数据集分析。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Mar;14(3):304-310. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.11.018. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
8
Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, is it Safer than Laparoscopic Bypass?机器人辅助 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术比腹腔镜胃旁路手术更安全吗?
Obes Surg. 2016 May;26(5):1016-20. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1884-3.
9
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: is there a difference in outcomes?机器人辅助与腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术:结果有差异吗?
World J Surg. 2011 Mar;35(3):637-42. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0938-x.
10
Does Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Provide Outcome Advantages over Standard Laparoscopic Approaches?机器人 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术是否比标准腹腔镜方法具有优势?
Obes Surg. 2018 Sep;28(9):2589-2596. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3228-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic-assisted surgery for acute abdominal emergencies: a systematic review of 1142 cases.机器人辅助手术治疗急性腹部急症:1142例病例的系统评价
J Robot Surg. 2025 Sep 5;19(1):558. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02657-y.
2
Safety and feasibility of robotic surgery in acute care setting: a systematic review.机器人手术在急症护理环境中的安全性和可行性:一项系统评价。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 6;19(1):454. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02630-9.
3
Single-Incision Laparoscopy in Abdominal Trauma: Current Evidence, Clinical Applications, and Evolving Role-A Narrative Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic repair of a free perforation of a marginal ulcer after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a safe alternative to open exploration.腹腔镜修复Roux-en-Y胃旁路术后边缘溃疡游离穿孔:一种安全的开腹探查替代方法。
JSLS. 2007 Jul-Sep;11(3):383-8.
腹部创伤中的单孔腹腔镜检查:当前证据、临床应用及不断演变的作用——一篇叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2025 May 21;14(10):3610. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103610.
4
Comparing Outcomes Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的疗效比较
JSLS. 2025 Apr-Jun;29(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00026. Epub 2025 May 7.
5
Real-Time Navigation in Liver Surgery Through Indocyanine Green Fluorescence: An Updated Analysis of Worldwide Protocols and Applications.通过吲哚菁绿荧光实现肝脏手术实时导航:全球方案与应用的最新分析
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 3;17(5):872. doi: 10.3390/cancers17050872.
6
Emergency robotic surgery: the experience of a single center and review of the literature.紧急机器人手术:单中心经验及文献复习。
World J Emerg Surg. 2024 Aug 17;19(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13017-024-00555-6.
7
Robotic versus laparoscopic general surgery in the emergency setting: a systematic review.机器人与腹腔镜普通外科手术在急诊环境中的比较:系统评价。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jul 5;18(1):281. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02016-3.
8
The role of RObotic surgery in EMergency setting (ROEM): protocol for a multicentre, observational, prospective international study on the use of robotic platform in emergency surgery.ROBOTIC 手术在急诊环境中的作用(ROEM):一项关于在急诊手术中使用机器人平台的多中心、观察性、前瞻性国际研究的方案。
World J Emerg Surg. 2024 Jun 4;19(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13017-024-00542-x.
9
Robotic Cholecystectomy Remains Safe and Effective After Regular Staffing Hours.常规工作时间之后进行机器人胆囊切除术仍然安全有效。
Cureus. 2024 Feb 18;16(2):e54413. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54413. eCollection 2024 Feb.
10
Robotic operations in urgent general surgery: a systematic review.机器人在紧急普通外科手术中的应用:系统综述。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):275-290. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01425-6. Epub 2022 Jun 21.