• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

获得性言语失用症患者在多次重复采样时间下的言语可懂度测量的稳定性。

Stability of Speech Intelligibility Measures Over Repeated Sampling Times in Speakers With Acquired Apraxia of Speech.

机构信息

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.

Department of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021 Jun 18;30(3S):1429-1445. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00135. Epub 2021 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00135
PMID:33761278
Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this investigation was to measure the test-retest stability of single-word intelligibility in a group of 28 speakers with chronic apraxia of speech and aphasia. Method The Assessment of Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech was administered twice to each participant, with samples separated by 1 week. Scoring of recorded samples was completed independently by three expert listeners using transcription and multiple-choice scoring formats. Results Percent intelligible words was very similar for the group over the two sampling times for both scoring formats (i.e., within 1.5%), with no statistically significant differences found between times. Statistically significant, very strong, positive correlations were found between sampling times for intelligibility scores. Transcription and multiple-choice scores were strongly, positively correlated, with multiple-choice scores being statistically higher. There was a statistically significant difference between mean transcription and multiple-choice scores for the group at Time 1 and Time 2. Individual performance was similar to group performance for the majority of participants. Conclusions These findings indicate that single-word intelligibility measures are stable over repeated sampling occasions. Stability was evident for transcription and multiple-choice scoring methods. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.14226737.

摘要

目的 本研究旨在测量 28 名慢性言语失用症和失语症患者的单字清晰度的重测稳定性。 方法 对每位参与者进行两次评估,两次测试之间间隔一周。三名专家听众分别使用转录和多项选择评分格式对录制的样本进行独立评分。 结果 对于两种评分格式,在两次采样时间内,组内的可理解单词百分比非常相似(即,在 1.5%以内),并且在时间之间未发现统计学上的显着差异。 可理解性得分之间的采样时间之间存在统计学上显着的,非常强的正相关关系。 转录和多项选择分数之间呈强正相关,多项选择分数在统计学上更高。 在时间 1 和时间 2 ,组的平均转录和多项选择分数之间存在统计学差异。对于大多数参与者,个体表现与组表现相似。 结论 这些发现表明,单字清晰度测量在重复采样时是稳定的。稳定性在转录和多项选择评分方法中都很明显。

相似文献

1
Stability of Speech Intelligibility Measures Over Repeated Sampling Times in Speakers With Acquired Apraxia of Speech.获得性言语失用症患者在多次重复采样时间下的言语可懂度测量的稳定性。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021 Jun 18;30(3S):1429-1445. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00135. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
2
Speech Intelligibility Outcomes Associated With Treatment for Acquired Apraxia of Speech: Magnitude of Change and Stability of Measurement.与获得性言语失用症治疗相关的言语可懂度结果:变化幅度和测量稳定性。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2024 Nov 4;33(6):2889-2903. doi: 10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00104. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
3
Computer-Mediated Assessment of Intelligibility in Aphasia and Apraxia of Speech.计算机介导的失语症和言语失用症可懂度评估
Aphasiology. 2011;25(12):1600-1620. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2011.628379.
4
Production variability and single word intelligibility in aphasia and apraxia of speech.失语症和言语失用症中的言语产出变异性与单词清晰度
J Commun Disord. 2011 Jan-Feb;44(1):103-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2010.07.007. Epub 2010 Aug 11.
5
Intelligibility of dysarthric speech: perceptions of speakers and listeners.构音障碍性言语的可懂度:说话者与听众的认知
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2008 Nov-Dec;43(6):633-48. doi: 10.1080/13682820801887117.
6
A Comparison of Sound Production Treatment and Metrical Pacing Therapy for Apraxia of Speech: A Single-Case Experimental Design.言语失用症的发声治疗与韵律节奏疗法比较:单病例实验设计
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Oct 17;32(5S):2493-2511. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-22-00302. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
7
Intelligibility in Down syndrome: Effect of measurement method and listener experience.唐氏综合征患者的可理解度:测量方法和听者经验的影响。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 May;56(3):501-511. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12602. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
8
The Relationship Between Single-Word Speech Severity and Intelligibility in Childhood Apraxia of Speech.儿童言语失用症中单字言语严重程度与可懂度的关系。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Mar 8;65(3):843-857. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00213. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
9
Construct-related validity of the TOCS measures: comparison of intelligibility and speaking rate scores in children with and without speech disorders.TOCS 测量的结构效度:有语言障碍和无语言障碍儿童的可懂度和语速得分比较。
J Commun Disord. 2014 Sep-Oct;51:51-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2014.06.007. Epub 2014 Jul 12.
10
A closer look at transcription intelligibility for speakers with dysarthria: evaluation of scoring paradigms and linguistic errors made by listeners.深入探究构音障碍患者的言语可懂度:评分范式及听众语言错误的评估
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2006 Aug;15(3):268-77. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2006/025).