Suppr超能文献

肠道准备和口服抗生素在结直肠手术中的选择性去污染:2019-2020 年澳大利亚和新西兰的当前实践、观点和趋势。

Bowel Preparation and Oral Antibiotic Agents for Selective Decontamination in Colorectal Surgery: Current Practice, Perspectives, and Trends in Australia and New Zealand, 2019-2020.

机构信息

Discipline of Surgery, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Discipline of Surgery and Anaesthetics, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2021 Oct;22(8):836-844. doi: 10.1089/sur.2020.432. Epub 2021 Mar 23.

Abstract

There has been much debate as to the importance of mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) and oral antibiotic agents (OAB) prior to elective colorectal surgery over the past two decades. There is no consensus between international guidelines. The Australia and New Zealand Mechanical Bowel Preparation and Oral Antibiotics (ANZ-MBP-OAB) questionnaire was distributed to colorectal surgeons after institutional board approval assessing specialist attitudes toward 18 enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) interventions. Data were analyzed using a rating scale and graded response model in item response theory (IRT) on Stata MP, version 15 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX). Specialist attitudes toward the effectiveness of MBP and OAB strategies in providing better short-term outcomes was ranked alongside other ERAS interventions. This was followed by specific questions examining current practice, perspectives, and trends. Ninety-five of 300 (31.7%) colorectal surgeons in Australia and New Zealand participated in the survey. Statistical modeling was achieved in 13 ERAS interventions. Compared with other ERAS interventions, the use of MBP with OAB and MBP alone ranked nine of 13 and 10 of 13, respectively, in order of effectiveness in providing better short-term outcomes after colorectal surgery. Oral antibiotic agents alone was not considered effective. Mechanical bowel preparation with OAB was considered to be the best strategy in both colon (37%) and rectal surgery (48%) but current practice varied substantially from perspective. Mechanical bowel preparation alone was strongly favored in rectal surgery (81%) with only 14% using MBP with OAB. In colon surgery, only 10% used MBP with OAB, with MBP alone (45%) and no preparation (45%) being equally the most commonly used strategies. Among Australian and New Zealand colorectal surgeons, MBP with OAB was considered the best bowel preparation strategy. However, despite an awareness of its benefits, MBP with OAB has yet to be widely adopted into clinical practice or guidelines in Australia and New Zealand.

摘要

在过去的二十年中,人们一直在争论在择期结直肠手术前进行机械肠道准备(MBP)和口服抗生素(OAB)的重要性。国际指南之间没有共识。在机构委员会批准后,向澳大利亚和新西兰的结直肠外科医生分发了澳大利亚和新西兰机械肠道准备和口服抗生素(ANZ-MBP-OAB)问卷,以评估专家对 18 项术后强化康复(ERAS)干预措施的态度。使用 Stata MP 版本 15(StataCorp LP,德克萨斯州学院站)中的评分量表和等级响应模型在项目反应理论(IRT)中对数据进行了分析。专家对 MBP 和 OAB 策略在提供更好的短期结果方面的有效性的态度与其他 ERAS 干预措施一起进行了排名。然后是关于当前实践、观点和趋势的具体问题。澳大利亚和新西兰的 300 名结直肠外科医生中有 95 名参加了这项调查。对 13 项 ERAS 干预措施进行了统计建模。与其他 ERAS 干预措施相比,MBP 联合 OAB 和 MBP 单独使用分别在提供更好的结直肠手术后短期结果方面的有效性排名第九和第十。单独使用口服抗生素并不被认为是有效的。MBP 联合 OAB 被认为是结肠(37%)和直肠手术(48%)的最佳策略,但当前实践与观点存在很大差异。单独使用 MBP 在直肠手术中受到强烈青睐(81%),只有 14%使用 MBP 联合 OAB。在结肠手术中,只有 10%使用 MBP 联合 OAB,单独使用 MBP(45%)和不进行准备(45%)是最常用的策略。在澳大利亚和新西兰的结直肠外科医生中,MBP 联合 OAB 被认为是最好的肠道准备策略。然而,尽管意识到其益处,但 MBP 联合 OAB 尚未在澳大利亚和新西兰广泛应用于临床实践或指南中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验