Suppr超能文献

择期结直肠切除术前口服抗生素机械肠道准备:澳大利亚单机构经验。

Mechanical bowel preparation with pre-operative oral antibiotics in elective colorectal resections: an Australian single institution experience.

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Dandenong Hospital, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2023 Oct;93(10):2439-2443. doi: 10.1111/ans.18428. Epub 2023 Apr 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leaks (AL) and surgical site infections (SSI) are serious complications after colorectal resection. Studies have shown the benefits of pre-operative oral antibiotics (OAB) with mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) in reducing AL and SSI rates. We aim to investigate our experience with the short-term outcomes of AL and SSI following elective colorectal resections in patients receiving OAB with MBP versus MBP only.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed from our database for patients who underwent elective colorectal resection between January 2019 and November 2021. Prior to August 2020, OAB was not used as part of MBP. After 2020, Neomycin and Metronidazole were used in conjunction with MBP. We evaluated differences in AL and SSI between both groups.

RESULTS

Five hundred and seventeen patients were included from our database with 247 having MBP while 270 had OAB and MBP. There was a significantly lower rate of AL in patients receiving MBP and OAB as compared to MBP alone (0.4% versus 3.0%, P-value = 0.03). The SSI rate at our institution was 4.4%. It was lower in patients with MBP and OAB as compared to MBP alone, but this was not clinically significant (3.3% versus 5.7%, P-value = 0.19).

CONCLUSION

The association in the reduction of AL with the addition of OAB to the MBP protocol seen here reinforces the need for future randomized controlled trials in the Australasian context. We recommend colorectal institutions in Australian and New Zealand consider OAB with MBP as part of their elective colorectal resection protocol.

摘要

背景

结直肠切除术后吻合口漏(AL)和手术部位感染(SSI)是严重的并发症。研究表明,术前口服抗生素(OAB)联合机械肠道准备(MBP)可降低 AL 和 SSI 发生率。我们旨在调查接受 OAB 联合 MBP 与仅接受 MBP 的择期结直肠切除术后 AL 和 SSI 短期结局的经验。

方法

对 2019 年 1 月至 2021 年 11 月期间接受择期结直肠切除术的患者数据库进行回顾性分析。2020 年 8 月之前,OAB 未作为 MBP 的一部分使用。2020 年之后,新霉素和甲硝唑与 MBP 联合使用。我们评估了两组之间 AL 和 SSI 的差异。

结果

从我们的数据库中纳入了 517 例患者,其中 247 例接受 MBP,270 例接受 OAB 和 MBP。与仅接受 MBP 相比,接受 MBP 和 OAB 的患者 AL 发生率明显较低(0.4%对 3.0%,P 值=0.03)。我们机构的 SSI 发生率为 4.4%。与仅接受 MBP 相比,接受 MBP 和 OAB 的患者 SSI 发生率较低,但无统计学意义(3.3%对 5.7%,P 值=0.19)。

结论

在此观察到 OAB 联合 MBP 方案可降低 AL 的发生率,这强调了在澳大拉西亚背景下进行未来随机对照试验的必要性。我们建议澳大利亚和新西兰的结直肠机构考虑将 OAB 联合 MBP 作为其择期结直肠切除手术方案的一部分。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验