Pesonen Janne, Shacklock Michael, Rantanen Pekka, Mäki Jussi, Karttunen Lauri, Kankaanpää Markku, Airaksinen Olavi, Rade Marinko
Department of Rehabilitation, Kuopio University Hospital, PL100, 70029 KYS, Kuopio, Finland.
Department of Surgery (incl. Physiatry), University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Mar 24;22(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04159-y.
The straight leg raise (SLR) is the most commonly applied physical tests on patients with sciatica, but the sensitivity and specificity ratings for disc hernia and neural compression leave areas for improvement. Hip internal rotation tensions the lumbosacral nerve roots and ankle dorsiflexion tensions the sciatic nerve along its course. We added these movements to the SLR (extended SLR = ESLR) as structural differentiators and tested inter-rater reliability in patients with LBP, with and without sciatica.
Forty subjects were recruited to the study by the study controller (SC), 20 in the sciatic group and in the control group. Two independent examiners (E1&E2) performed the ESLR and did not communicate to the subjects other than needed to determine the outcome of the ESLR. First, SLR was performed traditionally until first responses were evoked. At this hip flexion angle, a location-specific structural differentiation was performed to confirm whether the emerged responses were of neural origin. Cohen's Kappa score (CK) for interrater reliability was calculated for ESLR result in detection of sciatic patients. Also, the examiners' ESLR results were compared to the traditional SLR results.
The interrater agreement between Examiner 1 and Examiner 2 for the ESLR was 0.85 (p < 0.001, 95%CI: 0.71-0.99) translating to almost perfect agreement as measured by Cohen's Kappa When the ESLR was compared to the traditional SLR, the overall agreement rate was 75% (30/40). Kappa values between the traditional SLR and the E1's or E2's ESLR results were 0.50 (p < 0.0001; 95%CI 0.27-0.73) and 0.54 (p < 0.0001; 95%CI 0.30-0.77), respectively.
ESLR with the addition of location-specific structural differentiation is a reliable and repeatable tool in discerning neural symptoms from musculoskeletal in patients with radiating low back pain. We recommend adding these movements to the standard SLR with aim of improving diagnostic ability.
直腿抬高试验(SLR)是坐骨神经痛患者最常用的体格检查,但该试验对于椎间盘突出和神经受压的敏感性和特异性仍有待提高。髋关节内旋会拉紧腰骶神经根,踝关节背屈会在坐骨神经走行过程中拉紧坐骨神经。我们将这些动作添加到直腿抬高试验中(改良直腿抬高试验 = ESLR)作为结构鉴别因素,并在有和没有坐骨神经痛的腰痛患者中测试了评分者间信度。
研究负责人(SC)招募了40名受试者,坐骨神经痛组和对照组各20名。两名独立的检查者(E1和E2)进行改良直腿抬高试验,除了确定改良直腿抬高试验结果所需的交流外,不与受试者进行其他交流。首先,按传统方式进行直腿抬高试验,直到引出首次反应。在这个髋关节屈曲角度,进行特定部位的结构鉴别,以确认出现的反应是否源于神经。计算改良直腿抬高试验检测坐骨神经痛患者结果的评分者间信度的Cohen's Kappa评分(CK)。此外,将检查者的改良直腿抬高试验结果与传统直腿抬高试验结果进行比较。
检查者1和检查者2对改良直腿抬高试验的评分者间一致性为0.85(p < 0.001,95%CI:0.71 - 0.99),根据Cohen's Kappa测量,这意味着几乎完全一致。当将改良直腿抬高试验与传统直腿抬高试验进行比较时,总体一致率为75%(30/40)。传统直腿抬高试验与E1或E2的改良直腿抬高试验结果之间的Kappa值分别为0.50(p < 0.0001;95%CI 0.27 - 0.73)和0.54(p < 0.0001;95%CI 0.30 - 0.77)。
添加特定部位结构鉴别的改良直腿抬高试验是一种可靠且可重复的工具,可用于区分放射性腰痛患者的神经症状和肌肉骨骼症状。我们建议将这些动作添加到标准直腿抬高试验中,以提高诊断能力。