• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Sensitivity and Specificity of Modified Bragard Test in Patients With Lumbosacral Radiculopathy Using Electrodiagnosis as a Reference Standard.以电诊断为参考标准,评估改良布拉加德试验在腰骶神经根病患者中的敏感性和特异性。
J Chiropr Med. 2018 Mar;17(1):36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2017.10.004. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
2
The sensitivity and specificity of the Slump and the Straight Leg Raising tests in patients with lumbar disc herniation.腰椎间盘突出症患者中垂肩试验和直腿抬高试验的敏感性和特异性。
J Clin Rheumatol. 2008 Apr;14(2):87-91. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0b013e31816b2f99.
3
Detection of lumbosacral nerve root compression with a novel composite nerve conduction measurement.采用新型复合神经传导测量法检测腰骶神经根受压情况。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Dec 15;27(24):2811-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200212150-00016.
4
Physical examination for lumbar radiculopathy due to disc herniation in patients with low-back pain.对下背痛患者因椎间盘突出导致的腰椎神经根病进行体格检查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Feb 17(2):CD007431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007431.pub2.
5
Validity of the straight-leg raise test for patients with sciatic pain with or without lumbar pain using magnetic resonance imaging results as a reference standard.以磁共振成像结果作为参考标准,评估直腿抬高试验对伴有或不伴有腰痛的坐骨神经痛患者的有效性。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2011 May;34(4):231-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.04.010. Epub 2011 May 5.
6
Is the Straight Leg Raise Suitable for the Diagnosis of Radiculopathy? Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy in a Phase III Study.直腿抬高试验是否适用于神经根病的诊断?一项III期研究中的诊断准确性分析。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Dec 11;11(24):3138. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11243138.
7
The sensitivity of the seated straight-leg raise test compared with the supine straight-leg raise test in patients presenting with magnetic resonance imaging evidence of lumbar nerve root compression.在有腰椎神经根受压磁共振成像证据的患者中,坐位直腿抬高试验与仰卧位直腿抬高试验的敏感性比较。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Jul;88(7):840-3. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.04.016.
8
The relationship between history and physical examination findings and the outcome of electrodiagnostic testing in patients with sciatica referred to physical therapy.坐骨神经痛患者接受物理治疗时,其病史和体格检查结果与电诊断检查结果的关系。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Jul;44(7):508-17. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.5002. Epub 2014 May 22.
9
Accuracy of Clinical Tests in Detecting Disk Herniation and Nerve Root Compression in Subjects With Lumbar Radicular Symptoms.临床检测在诊断腰椎神经根症状患者椎间盘突出和神经根受压中的准确性。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Apr;99(4):726-735. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
10
The pain provocation-based straight leg raise test for diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation, lumbar radiculopathy, and/or sciatica: a systematic review of clinical utility.基于疼痛激发试验的直腿抬高试验用于诊断腰椎间盘突出症、腰椎神经根病和/或坐骨神经痛:临床效用的系统评价
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2012;25(4):215-23. doi: 10.3233/BMR-2012-0339.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of Life and Functional Status of Patients with Lumbar Radiculopathy.腰椎神经根病患者的生活质量和功能状态
Iran J Public Health. 2024 Aug;53(8):1837-1846. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v53i8.16289.
2
Manual traction is effective in alleviating lumbosacral spine pain: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial.手法牵引对缓解腰骶部脊柱疼痛有效:一项随机对照试验的证据。
Heliyon. 2024 May 10;10(10):e31013. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31013. eCollection 2024 May 30.
3
Telemedicine Evaluation of Hip Ailments.髋关节疾病的远程医疗评估
Cureus. 2023 May 11;15(5):e38900. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38900. eCollection 2023 May.
4
Extending the straight leg raise test for improved clinical evaluation of sciatica: reliability of hip internal rotation or ankle dorsiflexion.延长直腿抬高试验以改善坐骨神经痛的临床评估:髋关节内旋或踝关节背屈的可靠性
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Mar 24;22(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04159-y.
5
Use of Neurodynamic or Orthopedic Tension Tests for the Diagnosis of Lumbar and Lumbosacral Radiculopathies: Study of the Diagnostic Validity.神经动力或矫形张力测试在腰椎和腰骶神经根病诊断中的应用:诊断有效性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 26;17(19):7046. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197046.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of age on result of straight leg raising test in patients suffering lumbar disc herniation and sciatica.年龄对腰椎间盘突出症合并坐骨神经痛患者直腿抬高试验结果的影响。
J Res Med Sci. 2015 Feb;20(2):150-3.
2
The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study.全球腰痛负担:来自 2010 年全球疾病负担研究的估计。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jun;73(6):968-74. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204428. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
3
Electrodiagnosis of lumbar radiculopathy.腰椎神经根病的电诊断
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2013 Feb;24(1):79-91. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2012.08.011. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
4
A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain.一项关于全球腰痛患病率的系统评价。
Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Jun;64(6):2028-37. doi: 10.1002/art.34347. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
5
Validity of the straight-leg raise test for patients with sciatic pain with or without lumbar pain using magnetic resonance imaging results as a reference standard.以磁共振成像结果作为参考标准,评估直腿抬高试验对伴有或不伴有腰痛的坐骨神经痛患者的有效性。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2011 May;34(4):231-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.04.010. Epub 2011 May 5.
6
H-reflex amplitude asymmetry is an earlier sign of nerve root involvement than latency in patients with S1 radiculopathy.在S1神经根病患者中,H反射波幅不对称是神经根受累比潜伏期更早出现的征象。
BMC Res Notes. 2011 Apr 5;4:102. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-102.
7
Low back pain in Iran: a growing need to adapt and implement evidence-based practice in developing countries.伊朗的下腰痛:发展中国家适应和实施基于证据的实践的迫切需要。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 May 1;36(10):E638-46. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181fa1da2.
8
Utility of electrodiagnostic testing in evaluating patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy: An evidence-based review.电诊断检测在评估腰骶神经根病患者中的应用:基于证据的综述。
Muscle Nerve. 2010 Aug;42(2):276-82. doi: 10.1002/mus.21759.
9
Physical examination for lumbar radiculopathy due to disc herniation in patients with low-back pain.对下背痛患者因椎间盘突出导致的腰椎神经根病进行体格检查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Feb 17(2):CD007431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007431.pub2.
10
Physical assessment of lower extremity radiculopathy and sciatica.下肢神经根病和坐骨神经痛的体格检查
J Chiropr Med. 2007 Jun;6(2):75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jcme.2007.04.001.

以电诊断为参考标准,评估改良布拉加德试验在腰骶神经根病患者中的敏感性和特异性。

Sensitivity and Specificity of Modified Bragard Test in Patients With Lumbosacral Radiculopathy Using Electrodiagnosis as a Reference Standard.

作者信息

Homayouni Kaynoosh, Jafari Seyedeh Halimeh, Yari Hossein

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Fars, Islamic Republic of Iran.

出版信息

J Chiropr Med. 2018 Mar;17(1):36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2017.10.004. Epub 2018 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcm.2017.10.004
PMID:29628807
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5883635/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of a modified Bragard test compared with the straight leg raise (SLR) test in patients presenting with electrodiagnostic evidence of L5 and S1 nerve root compression.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study conducted on 506 consecutive patients with signs and symptoms consistent with lumbosacral radiculopathy confirmed by electrodiagnostic study. Patients were evaluated from September 2013 to September 2015 in the physical medicine and rehabilitation outpatient clinic of Shahid Faghihi Teaching Hospital, Shiraz, Iran. The SLR test was investigated concomitantly to determine the sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

Electrodiagnostic study findings indicated lumbosacral radiculopathy in 312 patients. Of these participants, 198 were positive on SLR testing, and of 114 SLR-negative patients, 79 were positive on Modified Bragard testing. Sensitivity of the Modified Bragard test was 69.3%, and specificity was 67.42%. Positive and negative predictive values were 73.15% and 63.16%, respectively. Positive likelihood ratio was 2.13, and negative likelihood ratio was 0.46. Diagnostic odds ratio was 4.63. In patients with symptom duration of less than 3 weeks, SLR sensitivity and specificity decreased as the Modified Bragard test diagnostic accuracy increased.

CONCLUSIONS

The Modified Bragard test is easy to perform and has an acceptable test performance, which can help to increase the discriminative power of clinical examination in patients with L5 or S1 nerve root compression who exhibit a negative SLR test result, especially in the acute phase of disease.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估改良布拉加德试验与直腿抬高(SLR)试验在有L5和S1神经根受压电诊断证据患者中的诊断准确性。

方法

这是一项横断面研究,对506例经电诊断研究证实有腰骶神经根病体征和症状的连续患者进行。2013年9月至2015年9月在伊朗设拉子沙希德·法吉希教学医院物理医学与康复门诊对患者进行评估。同时对SLR试验进行研究以确定其敏感性和特异性。

结果

电诊断研究结果显示312例患者有腰骶神经根病。在这些参与者中,198例SLR试验呈阳性,在114例SLR试验阴性的患者中,79例改良布拉加德试验呈阳性。改良布拉加德试验的敏感性为69.3%,特异性为67.42%。阳性和阴性预测值分别为73.15%和63.16%。阳性似然比为2.13,阴性似然比为0.46。诊断比值比为4.63。在症状持续时间少于3周的患者中,随着改良布拉加德试验诊断准确性的提高,SLR试验的敏感性和特异性降低。

结论

改良布拉加德试验操作简便,测试性能可接受,有助于提高对SLR试验结果为阴性的L5或S1神经根受压患者临床检查的鉴别能力,尤其是在疾病急性期。