• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

远程虚拟护理与传统临床就诊在择期骨科患者中的疗效比较:前瞻性随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

The efficacy of remote virtual care in comparison to traditional clinical visits for elective orthopaedic patients: A meta-analysis of prospective randomised controlled trials.

机构信息

Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, St. Stephen's Green, Dublin, Ireland.

School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; National Spinal Injuries Unit, Department of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery.

出版信息

Surgeon. 2022 Jun;20(3):177-186. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2021.02.008. Epub 2021 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.surge.2021.02.008
PMID:33762159
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Orthopaedic Trauma Association has recommended limitation of in-person encounters to absolute necessity. One method of ensuring standard patient care within these guidelines is through the implementation of telemedicine.

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy of telemedicine for elective orthopaedic patients in the recovery and/or rehabilitation period.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of articles in Medline/PubMed and The Cochrane Library databases was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines for prospective randomised controlled trials to compare clinical and symptomatic measures for elective patients managed routinely with remote care compared to those managed with standard in-clinic management. To be included for meta-analysis, parameters must be evaluated in ≥3 studies.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were included in the meta-analyses. Both telemedicine and control cohorts were comparable for patient satisfaction (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.90-1.07; I = 0%; p = 0.52) and patient retention analysis (RR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.51-3.06; p = 0.54; I = 0%). Similarly, there was no statistical difference appreciated between cohorts for overall Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score (p = 0.30), Timed Up and Go Test (p = 0.40), and Stair Test (p = 0.18). Significant difference did exist for visual analogue scale (VAS) scores (p = 0.02) in favour of in-clinic management.

CONCLUSION

Telemedicine will serve an integral aspect of healthcare delivery throughout the current COVID-19 pandemic and beyond in an effort to deliver safe, efficient and time-sensitive care to the orthopaedic patient population. The results of our meta-analyses indicate that virtual consultations are as effective as traditional in-person consultations for the care of elective orthopaedic patients in the recovery and rehabilitation period. However, further studies are needed to evaluate for initial consultations and certain sub-specialties of orthopaedics.

摘要

引言

矫形创伤协会建议将面对面的接触限制在绝对必要的范围内。在这些指导方针内确保标准患者护理的一种方法是通过实施远程医疗。

目的

评估远程医疗在恢复和/或康复期的择期矫形患者中的疗效。

方法

根据 PRISMA 指南对 Medline/PubMed 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库中的文章进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以比较常规远程护理管理的择期患者与标准门诊管理的患者的临床和症状测量值。要进行荟萃分析,参数必须在≥3 项研究中进行评估。

结果

11 项研究被纳入荟萃分析。远程医疗和对照组在患者满意度(RR,0.98;95%CI,0.90-1.07;I = 0%;p = 0.52)和患者保留分析(RR,1.25;95%CI,0.51-3.06;p = 0.54;I = 0%)方面具有可比性。同样,两组之间在总体西安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分(p = 0.30)、起立-行走测试(p = 0.40)和楼梯测试(p = 0.18)方面没有统计学差异。在视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分方面存在显著差异(p = 0.02),有利于门诊管理。

结论

远程医疗将在当前 COVID-19 大流行期间及以后成为医疗保健服务的一个组成部分,以向矫形患者群体提供安全、高效和及时的护理。我们的荟萃分析结果表明,虚拟咨询与传统的面对面咨询一样,可有效治疗恢复和康复期的择期矫形患者。然而,还需要进一步的研究来评估初始咨询和某些矫形亚专业。

相似文献

1
The efficacy of remote virtual care in comparison to traditional clinical visits for elective orthopaedic patients: A meta-analysis of prospective randomised controlled trials.远程虚拟护理与传统临床就诊在择期骨科患者中的疗效比较:前瞻性随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Surgeon. 2022 Jun;20(3):177-186. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2021.02.008. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
2
How Satisfied Are Patients and Surgeons with Telemedicine in Orthopaedic Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,患者和外科医生对骨科远程医疗的满意度如何?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Jan 1;479(1):47-56. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001494.
3
Letter to the editor on the efficacy of remote virtual care in comparison to traditional clinical visits for elective orthopaedic patients: A meta-analysis of prospective randomised controlled trials.
Surgeon. 2022 Jun;20(3):209-210. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2021.06.001. Epub 2021 Jul 17.
4
Patient reported outcomes with remote orthopaedic consultations by telemedicine: A randomised controlled trial.远程医疗的远程骨科咨询的患者报告结果:一项随机对照试验。
J Telemed Telecare. 2019 Sep;25(8):451-459. doi: 10.1177/1357633X18783921. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
5
Quality of care for remote orthopaedic consultations using telemedicine: a randomised controlled trial.使用远程医疗进行远程骨科会诊的护理质量:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 8;16(1):483. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1717-7.
6
The new 'normal': Rapid adoption of telemedicine in orthopaedics during the COVID-19 pandemic.新常态:COVID-19 大流行期间骨科领域迅速采用远程医疗。
Injury. 2020 Dec;51(12):2816-2821. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.09.009. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
7
Telemedicine in orthopaedics during COVID-19 and beyond: A systematic review.COVID-19 疫情期间及之后的骨科远程医疗:系统评价。
J Telemed Telecare. 2022 Jul;28(6):391-403. doi: 10.1177/1357633X20938241. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
8
Teleconsultation in orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient and physician experiences.远程骨科手术咨询:患者和医生体验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Telemed Telecare. 2022 Aug;28(7):471-480. doi: 10.1177/1357633X20950995. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
9
Virtualized clinical studies to assess the natural history and impact of gut microbiome modulation in non-hospitalized patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 a randomized, open-label, prospective study with a parallel group study evaluating the physiologic effects of KB109 on gut microbiota structure and function: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled study.用于评估非住院轻中度 COVID-19 患者肠道微生物组调节的自然史和影响的虚拟化临床研究:一项随机、开放标签、前瞻性研究,平行组研究评估 KB109 对肠道微生物组结构和功能的生理影响:一项随机对照研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Apr 2;22(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05157-0.
10
Telemedicine in Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence.骨科手术中的远程医疗:当前证据的系统评价
Telemed J E Health. 2022 May;28(5):613-635. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2021.0221. Epub 2021 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The Carbon Footprint of In-person Versus Virtual Orthopaedic Care.面对面与虚拟骨科护理的碳足迹
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2025 Jul 17;9(7). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00195. eCollection 2025 Jul 1.
2
Reliability and reproducibility of teleconsultation for evaluation and treatment indication of rotator cuff syndrome: a cross-sectional outcomes-based diagnostic study.用于评估和治疗肩袖综合征的远程会诊的可靠性和可重复性:一项基于结果的横断面诊断研究。
JSES Int. 2025 Jan 28;9(3):709-714. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.12.022. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Improving Patient Experience by Understanding Barriers and Incentives to Telehealth Adoption Among Physicians at a Large Academic Medical Center.
通过了解大型学术医疗中心医生采用远程医疗的障碍和激励因素来改善患者体验。
J Patient Exp. 2025 Jan 7;12:23743735241310961. doi: 10.1177/23743735241310961. eCollection 2025.
4
Virtual neurology survey: Factors influencing virtual care use among Ontario neurologists.虚拟神经病学调查:影响安大略省神经科医生使用虚拟医疗服务的因素
SAGE Open Med. 2024 Nov 8;12:20503121241293165. doi: 10.1177/20503121241293165. eCollection 2024.
5
Virtual Fracture Clinic Patients' Satisfaction Outcomes.虚拟骨折诊所患者的满意度结果。
Cureus. 2024 May 17;16(5):e60528. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60528. eCollection 2024 May.
6
Effectiveness of Telemedicine for Musculoskeletal Disorders: Umbrella Review.远程医疗治疗肌肉骨骼疾病的效果:伞式综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Feb 2;26:e50090. doi: 10.2196/50090.
7
Self-Reported Outcomes in Early Postoperative Management After Shoulder Surgery Using a Home-Based Strengthening and Stabilization System With Telehealth.基于家庭强化和稳定系统并结合远程医疗的肩部手术后早期康复管理的自我报告结果。
Sports Health. 2023 Jul-Aug;15(4):599-605. doi: 10.1177/19417381221116319. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
8
Lessons learned developing and deploying a provincial virtual mental health support during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间开发和部署省级虚拟心理健康支持方面的经验教训。
Healthc Manage Forum. 2022 Jul;35(4):231-235. doi: 10.1177/08404704221092691. Epub 2022 May 21.