Suppr超能文献

虚拟神经病学调查:影响安大略省神经科医生使用虚拟医疗服务的因素

Virtual neurology survey: Factors influencing virtual care use among Ontario neurologists.

作者信息

Campbell Sabrina, Ahluwalia Monish, Desai Jamsheed, Khosravani Houman, Mitchell Sara B, Kassardjian Charles D

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

SAGE Open Med. 2024 Nov 8;12:20503121241293165. doi: 10.1177/20503121241293165. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Current virtual care guidance lacks specialty-specific considerations. Neurological care is unique due to its reliance on physical examination and complex patient population. Our aim was to determine which factors impact virtual care suitability in neurology, virtual care adoption patterns, and satisfaction with virtual care among neurologists.

METHODS

Surveys were sent to Ontario neurologists through a shared email from September to November 2021. The survey consisted of four parts: demographics, virtual care adoption patterns, factors influencing virtual care use, and physician satisfaction with virtual care.

RESULTS

Sixty-six of 380 (17.4%) neurologists completed the survey. The pandemic resulted in a substantial increase in virtual care use, from 1.6% of all ambulatory visits in 2019 to 70.6% in 2020. Video teleconferencing was considered more appropriate across a broader range of presentations than phone visits, with both methods more suited to follow-ups. Neurologists were largely satisfied with virtual care except for the virtual neurological examination. The neurological presentations identified as least amenable to virtual consultation were movement disorders, limb weakness, gait/balance changes, and vision changes. Four presentations were felt to be most amenable to virtual care: sleep disorders, seizure, headache, and dizziness/syncope. Factors that were felt to reduce virtual care suitability included discussion of sensitive topics and acute presentations.

CONCLUSION

Neurologists were satisfied with virtual care as a means of providing outpatient care, though the specific reason for referral influenced perceived appropriateness. These results can inform the basis of the development of consensus guidelines for virtual care provision in neurology.

摘要

背景与目的

当前的虚拟护理指南缺乏针对特定专科的考量。神经科护理因其依赖体格检查和复杂的患者群体而独具特色。我们的目的是确定哪些因素会影响神经科虚拟护理的适用性、虚拟护理的采用模式以及神经科医生对虚拟护理的满意度。

方法

2021年9月至11月,通过共享电子邮件向安大略省的神经科医生发送了调查问卷。该问卷包括四个部分:人口统计学信息、虚拟护理采用模式、影响虚拟护理使用的因素以及医生对虚拟护理的满意度。

结果

380名神经科医生中有66名(17.4%)完成了调查。疫情导致虚拟护理的使用大幅增加,从2019年所有门诊就诊的1.6%增至2020年的70.6%。对于更广泛的就诊类型,视频电话会议被认为比电话就诊更合适,两种方式都更适合随访。除了虚拟神经检查外,神经科医生对虚拟护理基本满意。被认为最不适合虚拟咨询的神经科就诊类型包括运动障碍、肢体无力、步态/平衡改变和视力改变。有四种就诊类型被认为最适合虚拟护理:睡眠障碍、癫痫、头痛和头晕/晕厥。被认为会降低虚拟护理适用性的因素包括敏感话题的讨论和急性就诊情况。

结论

神经科医生对将虚拟护理作为提供门诊护理的一种方式感到满意,不过转诊的具体原因会影响其感知的适用性。这些结果可为制定神经科虚拟护理提供的共识指南提供依据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验