Viral Vaccine Preventable Diseases Branch, Division of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Viral Vaccine Preventable Diseases Branch, Division of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
J Virol. 2021 May 24;95(12). doi: 10.1128/JVI.00240-21.
Two herpes zoster (HZ) vaccines licensed in the United States are recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP): (i) live-attenuated vaccine (ZVL) using vOka strain varicella-zoster virus (VZV) and (ii) recombinant adjuvanted vaccine (RZV) containing recombinant varicella-zoster virus (VZV) glycoprotein E (gE). Two phase 3 clinical trials of RZV led the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) to recommend it with preferred status. VZV T cell-mediated immunity (CMI), but not humoral immunity, is considered essential for protection against HZ. Published studies of humoral immunity focused on VZV-specific IgG concentration. To complement reports comparing the CMI responses to these vaccines, we compared humoral responses in ZVL and RZV recipients, emphasizing functional qualities (avidity and neutralization). Baseline avidities to a VZV glycoprotein mixture (gp) were near the upper limit of detection, but avidity to gE was much lower. Small increases in gp avidity were observed for both RZV and ZVL vaccination (19 and 12 avidity index units [AIU], respectively). RZV boosted both gE avidity and VZV neutralizing antibody significantly more than ZVL (mean gE avidity boost, 47 AIU versus 22 AIU; mean neutralizing antibody boost, 22-fold versus 8-fold). Increases in neutralizing antibodies strongly correlated with gE avidity increases ( = 0.5) and moderately with gp avidity increases ( = 0.23). After 1 year, 81% of RZV recipients and only 18% of ZVL recipients retained >50% of their peak avidity boosts. These results are consistent with the CMI responses to these vaccines: RZV responses are skewed to long-term memory, whereas ZVL preferentially induces transient effector responses. These observations further distinguish the immunogenicity and duration of the immune response of the two vaccines. In addition, measurements of functional humoral immunity (IgG avidity and neutralizing antibody) in response to zoster immunization, alone or combined with other immune markers, might contribute to practical correlates of protection. Combined with previous observations of the cell-mediated response to these vaccines, this study suggests that vaccine development will benefit from more expansive and granular assessments of acquired immunity during early phase 1 immunogenicity trials.
两种在美国获得许可的带状疱疹 (HZ) 疫苗被免疫实践咨询委员会 (ACIP) 推荐:(i) 使用 oka 株水痘-带状疱疹病毒 (VZV) 的减毒活疫苗 (ZVL),以及 (ii) 含有重组 VZV 糖蛋白 E (gE) 的重组佐剂疫苗 (RZV)。两项关于 RZV 的 3 期临床试验促使免疫实践咨询委员会 (ACIP) 建议优先使用该疫苗。VZV T 细胞介导的免疫 (CMI),而不是体液免疫,被认为是预防 HZ 的关键。已发表的关于体液免疫的研究侧重于 VZV 特异性 IgG 浓度。为了补充比较这些疫苗的 CMI 反应的报告,我们比较了 ZVL 和 RZV 受种者的体液反应,重点是功能质量(亲和力和中和能力)。针对 VZV 糖蛋白混合物 (gp) 的基线亲和力接近检测上限,但 gE 的亲和力要低得多。RZV 和 ZVL 疫苗接种后,gp 亲和力均略有增加(分别为 19 和 12 个亲和力指数单位 [AIU])。RZV 显著增强了 gE 亲和力和 VZV 中和抗体,比 ZVL 增强更多(gE 亲和力增强平均为 47 AIU,而 ZVL 增强 22 AIU;中和抗体增强平均为 22 倍,而 ZVL 增强 8 倍)。中和抗体的增加与 gE 亲和力的增加强烈相关( = 0.5),与 gp 亲和力的增加中度相关( = 0.23)。1 年后,81%的 RZV 受种者和仅 18%的 ZVL 受种者保留了其峰值亲和力增强的 >50%。这些结果与这些疫苗的 CMI 反应一致:RZV 反应偏向于长期记忆,而 ZVL 则优先诱导短暂的效应器反应。这些观察结果进一步区分了两种疫苗的免疫原性和免疫反应持续时间。此外,单独或与其他免疫标志物结合,对带状疱疹免疫应答的功能性体液免疫(IgG 亲和力和中和抗体)的测量可能有助于实用的保护相关因素。结合以前对这些疫苗的细胞介导反应的观察结果,这项研究表明,在早期 1 期免疫原性试验中,疫苗开发将受益于对获得性免疫进行更广泛和更精细的评估。