Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助胸腔镜与传统胸腔镜手术治疗食管癌的局部复发率比较。

Lower local recurrence rate after robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy than conventional thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer.

机构信息

Esophageal Surgery, Akita University Hospital, Akita University School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan.

Comprehensive Cancer Control, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 24;11(1):6774. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86420-x.

Abstract

The oncological advantages of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy (RATE) over conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy (TE) for thoracic esophageal cancer have yet to be verified. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed clinical data to compare the incidences of recurrence within the surgical field after RATE and TE as an indicator of local oncological control. Among 121 consecutive patients with thoracic esophageal or esophagogastric junction cancers for which thoracoscopic surgery was indicated, 51 were treated with RATE while 70 received TE. The number of lymph nodes dissected from the mediastinum, duration of the thoracic portion of the surgery, and morbidity due to postoperative complications did not differ between the two groups. However, the rate of overall local recurrence within the surgical field was significantly (P = 0.039) higher in the TE (9%) than the RATE (0%) group. Lymph node recurrence within the surgical field occurred in left recurrent nerve, left tracheobronchial, left main bronchus and thoracic paraaortic lymph nodes, which were all difficult to approach to dissect. The other two local failures occurred around the anastomotic site. This study indicates that using RATE enabled the incidence of recurrence within the surgical field to be reduced, though there were some limitations.

摘要

机器人辅助胸腔镜食管切除术(RATE)与传统胸腔镜食管切除术(TE)治疗胸段食管癌的肿瘤学优势尚未得到证实。在这项研究中,我们回顾性分析了临床数据,比较了 RATE 和 TE 后手术野内复发的发生率,作为局部肿瘤控制的指标。在 121 例连续的胸段食管或食管胃交界癌患者中,有 51 例接受了 RATE 治疗,70 例接受了 TE 治疗。两组患者纵隔淋巴结清扫数量、胸腔手术时间和术后并发症发病率无差异。然而,TE(9%)组的手术野内总局部复发率明显高于 RATE(0%)组(P=0.039)。手术野内淋巴结复发发生在左迷走神经、左气管支气管、左主支气管和胸主动脉旁淋巴结,这些淋巴结均难以解剖。另外两个局部复发发生在吻合口周围。本研究表明,使用 RATE 可降低手术野内复发的发生率,但存在一些局限性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d52e/7990925/aae5e2e8744d/41598_2021_86420_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

5
[Application of artificial pneumothorax in semi-prone position to the video-assisted thoracic surgery of esophageal carcinoma].
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2012 Oct;34(10):785-9. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2012.10.014.
9
Prevention of intra-thoracic recurrent laryngeal nerve injury with robot-assisted esophagectomy.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 Jun;405(4):533-540. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01904-0. Epub 2020 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

2
Robotic-Assisted Esophagectomy: Current Situation and Future Perspectives.
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Aug 20;29(4):168-176. doi: 10.5761/atcs.ra.23-00064. Epub 2023 May 23.
3
Surgical intervention after neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer: a narrative review.
J Thorac Dis. 2023 Apr 28;15(4):2261-2276. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-420. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
5
Current status of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: what is the real benefit?
Surg Today. 2022 Sep;52(9):1246-1253. doi: 10.1007/s00595-021-02432-0. Epub 2021 Dec 1.

本文引用的文献

3
Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers, Version 2.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Jul 1;17(7):855-883. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0033.
8
Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan esophageal society: part 2.
Esophagus. 2019 Jan;16(1):25-43. doi: 10.1007/s10388-018-0642-8. Epub 2018 Aug 31.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验