• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助胸腔镜食管切除术实现了对左喉返神经周围广泛淋巴结清扫。

Extensive Lymph Node Dissection Around the Left Laryngeal Nerve Achieved With Robot-assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy.

作者信息

Motoyama Satoru, Sato Yusuke, Wakita Akiyuki, Kawakita Yuta, Nagaki Yushi, Imai Kazuhiro, Minamiya Yoshihiro

机构信息

Esophageal Surgery, Akita University Hospital, Akita, Japan

Thoracic Surgery, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.

出版信息

Anticancer Res. 2019 Mar;39(3):1337-1342. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13246.

DOI:10.21873/anticanres.13246
PMID:30842166
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: The potential advantages of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy (RATE) have yet to be verified. This study focused on the degree of lymph node dissection around the left recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 21 consecutive patients who received RATE (RATE group) and 38 who received conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy (TE) (TE group), both with extended lymphadenectomy, for thoracic squamous cell esophageal carcinoma, were enrolled in this study. We compared the numbers of lymph nodes dissected from the mediastinum, especially around the left RLN.

RESULTS

The median number of lymph nodes dissected from around the left RLN was 6 in the RATE group and 4 in the TE group, and the ratio of the dissected lymph nodes around the left RLN to all lymph nodes was significantly higher in the RATE group (p=0.048).

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that a robot-assisted surgical system enables for more extensive dissection of lymph nodes around the left RLN.

摘要

背景/目的:机器人辅助胸腔镜食管癌切除术(RATE)的潜在优势尚未得到证实。本研究聚焦于左喉返神经(RLN)周围的淋巴结清扫程度。

患者与方法

本研究纳入了连续21例接受RATE的患者(RATE组)和38例接受传统胸腔镜食管癌切除术(TE)的患者(TE组),两组均行扩大淋巴结清扫术治疗胸段食管鳞状细胞癌。我们比较了纵隔淋巴结清扫数量,特别是左RLN周围的淋巴结清扫数量。

结果

RATE组左RLN周围清扫淋巴结的中位数为6个,TE组为4个,RATE组左RLN周围清扫淋巴结与所有淋巴结的比例显著更高(p=0.048)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,机器人辅助手术系统能够更广泛地清扫左RLN周围的淋巴结。

相似文献

1
Extensive Lymph Node Dissection Around the Left Laryngeal Nerve Achieved With Robot-assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy.机器人辅助胸腔镜食管切除术实现了对左喉返神经周围广泛淋巴结清扫。
Anticancer Res. 2019 Mar;39(3):1337-1342. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13246.
2
Lymph Node Evaluation in Robot-Assisted Versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.机器人辅助与电视胸腔镜辅助食管癌切除术治疗食管鳞状细胞癌的淋巴结评估:一项倾向评分匹配分析
World J Surg. 2018 Feb;42(2):590-598. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4179-0.
3
Multicentre randomized clinical trial on robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy (REVATE trial).多中心随机对照临床试验:机器人辅助与电视辅助胸腔镜食管切除术(REVATE 试验)。
Br J Surg. 2024 Jul 2;111(7). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae143.
4
Novel technique for lymphadenectomy along left recurrent laryngeal nerve during thoracoscopic esophagectomy.胸腔镜食管切除术中沿左喉返神经清扫淋巴结的新方法。
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Mar 28;26(12):1340-1351. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i12.1340.
5
Feasibility of a robot-assisted thoracoscopic lymphadenectomy along the recurrent laryngeal nerves in radical esophagectomy for esophageal squamous carcinoma.机器人辅助胸腔镜下沿喉返神经行食管癌根治术中淋巴结清扫术的可行性研究(针对食管鳞状细胞癌)
Surg Endosc. 2014 Jun;28(6):1866-73. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3406-5. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
6
Lymph node dissection around left recurrent laryngeal nerve: robot-assisted vs. video-assisted McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.左喉返神经周围淋巴结清扫术:机器人辅助与视频辅助 McKeown 食管癌切除术治疗食管鳞癌。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Nov;35(11):6108-6116. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08105-2. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
7
A new method (the "Pincers maneuver") for lymphadenectomy along the right recurrent laryngeal nerve during thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position for esophageal cancer.一种用于食管癌俯卧位胸腔镜食管切除术中沿右喉返神经进行淋巴结清扫的新方法(“钳子操作法”)。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1496-1504. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5124-2. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
8
Technique and surgical outcomes of mesenterization and intra-operative neural monitoring to reduce recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis after thoracoscopic esophagectomy: A cohort study.胸腔镜食管切除术后肠系膜化和术中神经监测减少喉返神经麻痹的技术和手术结果:一项队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2018 Aug;56:301-306. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.05.738. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
9
Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes.机器人辅助微创食管切除术在治疗食管鳞癌方面真的比电视辅助微创食管切除术具有淋巴结清扫优势吗?基于短期结果的倾向评分匹配分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2019 Jul 1;32(7). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy110.
10
Robotic-assisted Esophagectomy vs Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy (REVATE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.机器人辅助食管切除术与电视辅助胸腔镜食管切除术(REVATE):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2019 Jun 10;20(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3441-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Caseload per Year in Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Narrative Review.机器人辅助微创食管切除术的年度病例量:一项叙述性综述
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 19;16(20):3538. doi: 10.3390/cancers16203538.
2
Utility for Postoperative Respiratory Function of Transmediastinal Esophagectomy for Esophageal Carcinoma.用于胸内食管癌切除术术后呼吸功能的工具。
In Vivo. 2024 Sep-Oct;38(5):2358-2363. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13702.
3
Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18,187 patients.
机器人辅助与传统微创食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的短期疗效比较:18187 例患者的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Mar 16;18(1):125. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01880-3.
4
Comparison of the total and hidden blood loss in patients undergoing single-level open and unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective case control study.单节段经皮与单侧双通道内镜下经椎间孔腰椎间融合术患者的总失血量和隐性失血量比较:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Apr 14;24(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06393-y.
5
Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助微创食管切除术与电视辅助微创食管切除术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Transl Cancer Res. 2021 Nov;10(11):4601-4616. doi: 10.21037/tcr-21-1482.
6
Salvage Robotic-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy after Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Clinical T4b Esophageal Cancer: A Case Report.根治性放化疗后挽救性机器人辅助胸腔镜食管切除术治疗 T4b 期食管鳞癌 1 例报告
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Apr 20;29(2):97-102. doi: 10.5761/atcs.cr.21-00175. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
7
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted, Video-Assisted, and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.机器人辅助、视频辅助与开放性食管癌切除术临床疗效的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2129228. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.29228.
8
Robotic Esophagectomy. A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.机器人辅助食管切除术。临床结果的系统评价与荟萃分析
J Pers Med. 2021 Jul 6;11(7):640. doi: 10.3390/jpm11070640.
9
Lower local recurrence rate after robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy than conventional thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer.机器人辅助胸腔镜与传统胸腔镜手术治疗食管癌的局部复发率比较。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 24;11(1):6774. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86420-x.
10
Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes between robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy and video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助微创食管切除术与电视辅助微创食管切除术的短期临床结局比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Feb;13(2):708-719. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-2896.