Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Division of Health Informatics, Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Mar 15;72(6):987-994. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa152.
Several studies have investigated the utility of electronic decision support alerts in diagnostic stewardship for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). However, it is unclear if alerts are effective in reducing inappropriate CDI testing and/or CDI rates. The aim of this systematic review was to determine if alerts related to CDI diagnostic stewardship are effective at reducing inappropriate CDI testing volume and CDI rates among hospitalized adult patients.
We searched Ovid Medline and 5 other databases for original studies evaluating the association between alerts for CDI diagnosis and CDI testing volume and/or CDI rate. Two investigators independently extracted data on study characteristics, study design, alert triggers, cointerventions, and study outcomes.
Eleven studies met criteria for inclusion. Studies varied significantly in alert triggers and in study outcomes. Six of 11 studies demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in CDI testing volume, 6 of 6 studies evaluating appropriateness of CDI testing found a significant reduction in the proportion of inappropriate testing, and 4 of 7 studies measuring CDI rate demonstrated a significant decrease in the CDI rate in the postintervention vs preintervention period. The magnitude of the increase in appropriate CDI testing varied, with some studies reporting an increase with minimal clinical significance.
The use of electronic alerts for diagnostic stewardship for C. difficile was associated with reductions in CDI testing, the proportion of inappropriate CDI testing, and rates of CDI in most studies. However, broader concerns related to alerts remain understudied, including unintended adverse consequences and alert fatigue.
多项研究调查了电子决策支持警报在艰难梭菌感染(CDI)诊断管理中的效用。然而,目前尚不清楚警报是否能有效减少不必要的 CDI 检测和/或 CDI 发生率。本系统评价的目的是确定与 CDI 诊断管理相关的警报是否能有效降低住院成年患者中不必要的 CDI 检测量和 CDI 发生率。
我们在 Ovid Medline 和其他 5 个数据库中搜索了评估 CDI 诊断警报与 CDI 检测量和/或 CDI 率之间关联的原始研究。两名调查员独立提取研究特征、研究设计、警报触发因素、联合干预措施和研究结果的数据。
11 项研究符合纳入标准。研究在警报触发因素和研究结果方面存在显著差异。11 项研究中的 6 项表明 CDI 检测量有统计学意义的减少,6 项评估 CDI 检测适宜性的研究发现不适当检测的比例显著降低,7 项测量 CDI 率的研究中有 4 项表明干预后与干预前相比 CDI 率显著降低。适当的 CDI 检测增加的幅度不同,一些研究报告说增加的幅度很小,临床意义不大。
电子警报在艰难梭菌的诊断管理中的应用与大多数研究中 CDI 检测、不适当的 CDI 检测比例和 CDI 率的减少有关。然而,警报相关的更广泛问题仍有待研究,包括意外的不良后果和警报疲劳。