Suppr超能文献

HoLEP 治疗急性和非神经性慢性尿潴留:效果如何?

HoLEP for acute and non-neurogenic chronic urinary retention: how effective is it?

机构信息

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2021 Jul;39(7):2355-2361. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03657-x. Epub 2021 Mar 24.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine catheter status within 3 months of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for acute and non-neurogenic chronic urinary retention (AUR and NNCUR), to compare short-term outcomes of HoLEP for urinary retention (UR) versus lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), and to report long-term serum creatinine (SC) after HoLEP for high-pressure chronic urinary retention (HPCUR).

METHODS

A prospectively maintained database of the first 500 consecutive HoLEP cases performed under the care of a single surgeon was analysed retrospectively. Urodynamic studies (UDS) did not play a role in the decision making process for those with UR. NNCUR was defined as painless, with post-void residual volume (PVR) greater than 300 ml in men able to void and initial catheter drainage > 1000 ml in men unable to void.

RESULTS

280/500 (56%) were in UR: AUR (195), and NNCUR (85) including 22 with HPCUR. The UR cohort were older with higher enucleated tissue weight [median (IQR); 72 years (66-79 year) and 56 g (29.8-86.3 g)], than the LUTS cohort [70 years (64-75 year) and 38 g (18-67 g)] (p < 0.001). 98.9% with AUR and 98.8% with NNCUR were catheter-free 3 months after HoLEP. There were no significant differences in transfusion rates, hospital stay, or time to first trial without catheter (TWOC) between the LUTS and UR cohorts, nor in international prostate symptom score and quality of life scores, maximum urinary flow rate, post void residual volume or urinary incontinence at 3 months. Patients with NNCUR were less likely to pass their first TWOC (58.8%) than those with AUR (84.6%) or LUTS (87.7%), p < 0.001. None with HPCUR had a clinically significant deterioration in SC at a median of 60 months (IQR 36-82 months).

CONCLUSION

HoLEP has 3-month catheter-free rates in excess of 98.5% for AUR and NNCUR in patients not pre-selected by UDS. First TWOC is significantly more likely to fail after HoLEP for NNCUR than AUR or LUTS. HoLEP is a durable treatment for HPCUR and there is no need to monitor renal function to detect recurrence.

摘要

目的

在接受钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)治疗急性和非神经性慢性尿潴留(AUR 和 NNCUR)后 3 个月内确定导管状况,比较 HoLEP 治疗尿潴留(UR)与下尿路症状(LUTS)的短期结果,并报告 HoLEP 治疗高压性慢性尿潴留(HPCUR)后血清肌酐(SC)的长期变化。

方法

回顾性分析了一位外科医生治疗的 500 例连续 HoLEP 病例的前瞻性维护数据库。对于有 UR 的患者,尿动力学研究(UDS)并未在决策过程中发挥作用。NNCUR 定义为无痛,排空后残余尿量(PVR)大于 300ml 且能够排尿,排空后残余尿量(PVR)大于 1000ml 且无法排尿的男性初始导管引流。

结果

500 例中有 280 例(56%)发生 UR:AUR(195 例)和 NNCUR(85 例),其中 22 例患有 HPCUR。UR 组年龄较大,前列腺切除组织重量较高[中位数(IQR);72 岁(66-79 岁)和 56g(29.8-86.3g)],而 LUTS 组[70 岁(64-75 岁)和 38g(18-67g)](p<0.001)。98.9%的 AUR 和 98.8%的 NNCUR 在 HoLEP 后 3 个月内无需导管。LUTS 组和 UR 组之间的输血率、住院时间或首次无导管试验时间(TWOC)以及国际前列腺症状评分和生活质量评分、最大尿流率、排空后残余尿量或尿失禁均无显著差异3 个月。NNCUR 患者首次 TWOC 通过率(58.8%)低于 AUR(84.6%)或 LUTS(87.7%)患者(p<0.001)。中位时间为 60 个月(IQR 36-82 个月),无一例 HPCUR 患者的 SC 出现临床显著恶化。

结论

HoLEP 对未通过 UDS 预选择的 AUR 和 NNCUR 患者,3 个月时导管无残留率超过 98.5%。与 AUR 或 LUTS 相比,NNCUR 后首次 TWOC 失败的可能性明显更高。HoLEP 是 HPCUR 的一种持久治疗方法,无需监测肾功能以检测复发。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验