Suppr超能文献

种植制度改变了混种大麦而非豌豆的水力特性。

Cropping systems alter hydraulic traits of barley but not pea grown in mixture.

机构信息

Institute of Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering (ENAC), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Ecological Systems Laboratory (ECOS), Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Plant Cell Environ. 2021 Sep;44(9):2912-2924. doi: 10.1111/pce.14054. Epub 2021 Apr 27.

Abstract

Extreme events such as drought and heatwaves are among the biggest challenges to agricultural production and food security. However, the effects of cropping systems on drought resistance of arable crops via their hydraulic behaviour remain unclear. We investigated how hydraulic traits of a field-grown pea-barley (Pisum sativum L. and Hordeum vulgare L.) mixture were affected by different cropping systems, that is, organic and conventional farming with intensive or conservation tillage. Xylem vulnerability to cavitation of both species was estimated by measuring the pressure inducing 50% loss of hydraulic conductivity (P ), while the water stress plants experienced in the field were assessed using native percentage loss of hydraulic conductivity (nPLC). Pea and barley showed contrasting hydraulic behaviours: pea was less vulnerable to xylem cavitation and less stressed than barley; cropping systems affected the xylem vulnerability of barley, but not of pea. Barley grown under conventional farming with no tillage was more vulnerable and stressed than under organic farming with intensive tillage. nPLC proved to be a valuable indicator for plant water stress. Our results highlight the impact of cropping systems on crop xylem vulnerability and drought resistance, thus plant hydraulic traits, for protecting food security under future climate.

摘要

极端事件,如干旱和热浪,是农业生产和粮食安全面临的最大挑战之一。然而,作物系统通过其水力行为对旱地作物抗旱性的影响尚不清楚。我们研究了不同的种植制度,即有机和常规农业中的密集耕作和保护性耕作,如何影响田间生长的豌豆-大麦(Pisum sativum L.和Hordeum vulgare L.)混播的水力特性。通过测量导致水力导率损失 50%的压力(P )来估计两种物种木质部对空化的脆弱性,而使用原生水力导率损失的百分比(nPLC)来评估植物在田间经历的水分胁迫。豌豆和大麦表现出相反的水力行为:豌豆比大麦木质部空化脆弱性低,水分胁迫小;种植制度影响大麦的木质部脆弱性,但不影响豌豆。与有机耕作中的密集耕作相比,常规耕作中不耕作的大麦更脆弱,水分胁迫更大。nPLC 被证明是植物水分胁迫的一个有价值的指标。我们的结果强调了种植制度对作物木质部脆弱性和抗旱性的影响,因此对保护未来气候下的粮食安全具有重要意义。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验