Centre for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Jul;18(5):588-595. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2021.1892842. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
Various factors influence the selection of assistive technology for young children within a context with limited resources, such as South Africa. Rehabilitation professionals are required to weigh up different factors as part of their professional reasoning process when making assistive technology (AT) selections. Insight into the perceived influence of different factors may assist in understanding how professionals make decisions about AT in this context.
An online survey with questions designed using best-worst scaling was distributed to rehabilitation professionals throughout South Africa. Factors influencing assistive technology selection included in the best-worst survey were identified in previous phases of a larger project. A total of = 451 rehabilitation professionals completed the survey by selecting the factors that were most and least influential on their assistive technology provision.
Results of the survey were obtained by calculating the number of times each factor was selected as most influential across the entire sample, and across all questions, enabling the researchers to sort the items in terms of the frequency of selection.
Even though the rehabilitation professionals that participated in the study provide services in a context with limited resources, assessment and factors pertaining to the assistive technology itself were generally perceived to be of greater influence than environmental factors. It is recommended that these factors be reflected in frameworks and models of AT selection.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe family's ability to support the implementation of AT is an important resource that is perceived to influence the selection of AT by an RP.Insight into the mind-set of professionals that are used to selecting AT within settings with limited resources may provide RPs in well-resourced contexts with guidance on how to do more, with less.RPs should aim to determine child preference and attitude towards AT during the AT selection process.RPs should be aware of their own influence on AT selection. Existing AT Selection models should be adapted to clearly reflect the influence of the recommending professional.
在资源有限的情况下,如南非,各种因素都会影响到为幼儿选择辅助技术。康复专业人员在做出辅助技术(AT)选择时,需要权衡不同的因素,这是他们专业推理过程的一部分。了解不同因素的感知影响可能有助于理解专业人员如何在这种情况下做出 AT 决策。
一项使用最佳最差量表设计的在线调查,分发给南非各地的康复专业人员。最佳最差调查中包含的影响辅助技术选择的因素是在一个更大项目的早期阶段确定的。共有 451 名康复专业人员通过选择对其辅助技术提供最有影响和最没有影响的因素完成了调查。
通过计算每个因素在整个样本中被选为最有影响的次数,以及在所有问题中被选为最有影响的次数,得出了调查结果,使研究人员能够根据选择的频率对项目进行排序。
尽管参与研究的康复专业人员在资源有限的环境中提供服务,但评估和与辅助技术本身相关的因素通常被认为比环境因素更有影响。建议在辅助技术选择框架和模型中反映这些因素。
家庭支持辅助技术实施的能力是一个重要的资源,被认为会影响康复专业人员对辅助技术的选择。了解习惯于在资源有限的环境中选择辅助技术的专业人员的思维模式,可能会为资源充足的环境中的康复专业人员提供指导,帮助他们用更少的资源做更多的事情。康复专业人员应在辅助技术选择过程中确定儿童对辅助技术的偏好和态度。康复专业人员应意识到自己对辅助技术选择的影响。现有的辅助技术选择模型应进行调整,以清楚地反映推荐专业人员的影响。