• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球正义与 COVID-19 疫苗:公共产品框架的局限性。

Global justice and the COVID-19 vaccine: Limitations of the public goods framework.

机构信息

FXB Centre for Health and Human Rights, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA.

出版信息

Glob Public Health. 2021 Aug-Sep;16(8-9):1512-1521. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2021.1906926. Epub 2021 Mar 25.

DOI:10.1080/17441692.2021.1906926
PMID:33764847
Abstract

As vaccines for COVID-19 were first being approved for use, there were widespread calls for it to be assigned a 'global public good'. However, allocating the COVID-19 vaccine globally poses a novel challenge of redistribution, one that cannot be effectively undertaken using current mechanisms for the dispensation of aid. An examination of the origins and implicit logic of global public goods theory shows that it would not be effective as a framework in this context. I argue that while it is a useful rhetorical tool to underscore the need for global access, it fails to account for concerns arising out of structural inequities between countries in the Global South and North. In addition to being ill-defined, the phrase encodes a neoliberal logic - one that prioritises the protection of private capital over democratic claims of redistribution and social justice. To ensure global access, our attention must be focussed instead on explicitly accounting for inequities, securing access for countries in the Global South and addressing the norm-setting powers of pharmaceutical companies.

摘要

随着 COVID-19 疫苗的首次获准使用,人们广泛呼吁将其指定为“全球公益物”。然而,在全球范围内分配 COVID-19 疫苗带来了重新分配的新挑战,这是当前援助分配机制无法有效承担的。对全球公益物理论的起源和隐含逻辑的考察表明,在这种情况下,它作为一个框架是无效的。我认为,虽然它是强调全球获取的必要性的有用修辞工具,但它没有考虑到南方国家和北方国家之间结构性不平等所带来的问题。除了定义不明确之外,这个短语还包含了新自由主义逻辑——它优先保护私人资本,而不是民主要求的再分配和社会正义。为了确保全球获取,我们必须更加关注明确核算不平等,确保南方国家获得疫苗,并解决制药公司的规范制定权力。

相似文献

1
Global justice and the COVID-19 vaccine: Limitations of the public goods framework.全球正义与 COVID-19 疫苗:公共产品框架的局限性。
Glob Public Health. 2021 Aug-Sep;16(8-9):1512-1521. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2021.1906926. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
2
Hard choices: Ethical challenges in phase 1 of COVID-19 vaccine roll-out in South Africa.艰难的选择:南非 COVID-19 疫苗推广第一阶段的伦理挑战。
S Afr Med J. 2021 Mar 26;111(6):554-558.
3
Just allocation of COVID-19 vaccines.2019冠状病毒病疫苗的合理分配
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Feb;6(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004812.
4
Justice through a Wide-Angle Lens.从广角镜头看司法
Hastings Cent Rep. 2021 May;51(3):2. doi: 10.1002/hast.1253.
5
The commitment for fair distribution of COVID-19 vaccine among all countries of the world.在世界各国之间公平分配新冠疫苗的承诺。
Res Nurs Health. 2021 Apr;44(2):266-267. doi: 10.1002/nur.22112. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
6
Risky business: COVAX and the financialization of global vaccine equity.高风险的生意:COVAX 与全球疫苗公平的金融化。
Global Health. 2021 Sep 20;17(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00763-8.
7
Vaccine nationalism will persist: global public goods need effective engagement of global citizens.疫苗民族主义将持续存在:全球公益事业需要全球公民的有效参与。
Global Health. 2022 Feb 12;18(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00802-y.
8
Sharing Technology and Vaccine Doses to Address Global Vaccine Inequity and End the COVID-19 Pandemic.共享技术和疫苗剂量以解决全球疫苗不平等问题并终结新冠疫情。
JAMA. 2021 Jul 20;326(3):219-220. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.10823.
9
Recalling the universal health coverage vision and equity in the COVID-19 vaccine distribution plan.回顾《新冠疫苗分配计划中的全民健康覆盖愿景和公平性》。
Pan Afr Med J. 2021 Jul 13;39:197. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.39.197.29041. eCollection 2021.
10
The Inefficient and Unjust Global Distribution of COVID-19 Vaccines: From a Perspective of Critical Global Justice.《COVID-19 疫苗在全球分配中效率低下且不公平:从批判全球正义的视角》。
Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211060992. doi: 10.1177/00469580211060992.

引用本文的文献

1
Overcoming barriers to medical countermeasures: Strengthening global biosecurity.克服医学应对措施的障碍:加强全球生物安全。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025 Dec;21(1):2483043. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2025.2483043. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
2
Towards opioid access without excess.实现阿片类药物的合理可及性。
Lancet Public Health. 2025 May;10(5):e422-e427. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(25)00035-0. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
3
Vaccine equity in COVID-19: a meta-narrative review.新冠疫苗公平性:元叙述性综述。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Dec;7(12). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009876.
4
Barriers to COVID-19 Health Products in Low-and Middle-Income Countries During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Rapid Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis.新冠肺炎大流行期间中低收入国家的 COVID-19 卫生产品障碍:快速系统评价和证据综合。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 22;10:928065. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.928065. eCollection 2022.
5
Attitudes Toward the Global Allocation of Chinese COVID-19 Vaccines: Cross-sectional Online Survey of Adults Living in China.对中国新冠疫苗全球分配的态度:对居住在中国的成年人的横断面在线调查。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Jun 7;8(6):e33484. doi: 10.2196/33484.
6
Reimagining Health as a 'Flow on Effect' of Biomedical Innovation: Research Policy as a Site of State Activism.将健康重新想象为生物医学创新的“连带效应”:作为国家行动主义场所的研究政策。
Minerva. 2022;60(2):235-256. doi: 10.1007/s11024-021-09456-3. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
7
The Inefficient and Unjust Global Distribution of COVID-19 Vaccines: From a Perspective of Critical Global Justice.《COVID-19 疫苗在全球分配中效率低下且不公平:从批判全球正义的视角》。
Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211060992. doi: 10.1177/00469580211060992.
8
Global access to COVID-19 vaccines: a scoping review of factors that may influence equitable access for low and middle-income countries.全球获取 COVID-19 疫苗:可能影响中低收入国家公平获取疫苗的因素的范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 30;11(9):e049505. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049505.