Wake Orthopaedics, WakeMed Health and Hospitals , Raleigh , North Carolina.
UPMC Center for Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Jun 2;103(11):961-967. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00917.
Off-track lesions are strongly associated with failure after arthroscopic Bankart repair. However, on-track lesions with a small distance-to-dislocation (DTD) value, or "near-track lesions," also may be at risk for failure. The purpose of the present study was to determine the association of DTD with failure after arthroscopic Bankart repair.
We performed a retrospective analysis of 173 individuals who underwent primary arthroscopic Bankart repair between 2007 and 2015. Glenoid bone loss and Hill-Sachs lesion size were measured with use of previously reported methods. Patients with failure were defined as those who sustained a dislocation after the index procedure, whereas controls were defined as individuals who did not. DTD was defined as the distance from the medial edge of the Hill-Sachs lesion to the medial edge of the glenoid track. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed for DTD to determine the critical threshold that would best predict failure. The study population was subdivided into individuals ≥20 years old and <20 years old.
Twenty-eight patients (16%) sustained a recurrent dislocation following Bankart repair. Increased glenoid bone loss (p < 0.001), longer Hill-Sachs lesion length (p < 0.001), and decreased DTD (p < 0.001) were independent predictors of failure. ROC curve analysis of DTD alone demonstrated that a threshold value of 8 mm could best predict failure (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.73). DTD had strong predictive power (AUC = 0.84) among individuals ≥20 years old and moderate predictive power (AUC = 0.69) among individuals <20 years old. Decreasing values of DTD were associated with a stepwise increase in the failure rate.
A "near-track" lesion with a DTD of <8 mm, particularly in individuals ≥20 years old, may be predictive of failure following arthroscopic Bankart repair. When using the glenoid track concept as the basis for surgical decision-making, clinicians may need to consider the DTD value as a continuous variable to estimate failure instead of using a binary on-track/off-track designation.
Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of Levels of Evidence.
关节镜下 Bankart 修复术后的脱臼与非轨道损伤密切相关。然而,轨道内的“近轨道”损伤,即具有小脱位距离(DTD)值的损伤,也可能存在失败的风险。本研究的目的是确定 DTD 与关节镜下 Bankart 修复术后失败的关系。
我们对 2007 年至 2015 年间接受初次关节镜下 Bankart 修复的 173 名患者进行了回顾性分析。采用先前报道的方法测量肩盂骨缺损和 Hill-Sachs 损伤的大小。失败的定义是指在索引程序后发生脱位的患者,而对照组则定义为未发生脱位的患者。DTD 定义为 Hill-Sachs 损伤内侧缘到肩盂轨道内侧缘的距离。为了确定最佳预测失败的临界阈值,我们绘制了 DTD 的接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线。将研究人群分为年龄≥20 岁和<20 岁的两组。
28 例(16%)患者在 Bankart 修复术后出现复发性脱位。更大的肩盂骨缺损(p<0.001)、更长的 Hill-Sachs 损伤长度(p<0.001)和更小的 DTD(p<0.001)是失败的独立预测因素。单独进行 DTD 的 ROC 曲线分析表明,8mm 的阈值可以最好地预测失败(曲线下面积[AUC]为 0.73)。在年龄≥20 岁的患者中,DTD 具有很强的预测能力(AUC=0.84),在年龄<20 岁的患者中具有中等预测能力(AUC=0.69)。DTD 值的降低与失败率的逐步增加相关。
对于年龄≥20 岁的患者,具有 DTD 值<8mm 的“近轨道”损伤可能预示着关节镜下 Bankart 修复术后的失败。当使用肩盂轨道概念作为手术决策的基础时,临床医生可能需要将 DTD 值视为连续变量来估计失败,而不是使用二进制的轨道/非轨道指定。
预后 III 级。请参阅作者说明,以获取完整的证据水平描述。