Kunkel Amber, White Michael, Piola Patrice
Emerging Diseases Epidemiology Unit, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Malaria: Parasites and Hosts Unit, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Mar 25;17(3):e1008850. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008850. eCollection 2021 Mar.
Emergence of resistance to artemisinin and partner drugs in the Greater Mekong Subregion has made elimination of malaria from this region a global priority; it also complicates its achievement. Novel drug strategies such as triple artemisinin combination therapies (ACTs) and chemoprophylaxis have been proposed to help limit resistance and accelerate elimination. The objective of this study was to better understand the potential impacts of triple ACTs and chemoprophylaxis, using a mathematical model parameterized using data from Cambodia. We used a simple compartmental model to predict trends in malaria incidence and resistance in Cambodia from 2020-2025 assuming no changes in transmission since 2018. We assessed three scenarios: a status quo scenario with artesunate-mefloquine (ASMQ) as treatment; a triple ACT scenario with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) plus mefloquine (MQ) as treatment; and a chemoprophylaxis scenario with ASMQ as treatment plus DP as chemoprophylaxis. We predicted MQ resistance to increase under the status quo scenario. Triple ACT treatment reversed the spread of MQ resistance, but had no impact on overall malaria incidence. Joint MQ-PPQ resistance declined under the status quo scenario for the baseline parameter set and most sensitivity analyses. Compared to the status quo, triple ACT treatment limited spread of MQ resistance but also slowed declines in PPQ resistance in some sensitivity analyses. The chemoprophylaxis scenario decreased malaria incidence, but increased the spread of strains resistant to both MQ and PPQ; both effects began to reverse after the intervention was removed. We conclude that triple ACTs may limit spread of MQ resistance in the Cambodia, but would have limited impact on malaria incidence and might slow declines in PPQ resistance. Chemoprophylaxis could have greater impact on incidence but also carries higher risks of resistance. Aggressive strategies to limit transmission the GMS are needed to achieve elimination goals, but any intervention should be accompanied by monitoring for drug resistance.
大湄公河次区域出现对青蒿素及联合用药的耐药性,使得该地区消除疟疾成为全球优先事项;这也给实现该目标带来了复杂情况。已提出新型药物策略,如三联青蒿素联合疗法(ACTs)和化学预防,以帮助限制耐药性并加速消除疟疾。本研究的目的是利用一个使用柬埔寨数据进行参数化的数学模型,更好地理解三联ACTs和化学预防的潜在影响。我们使用一个简单的房室模型来预测柬埔寨2020 - 2025年疟疾发病率和耐药性的趋势,假设自2018年以来传播情况没有变化。我们评估了三种情景:以青蒿琥酯 - 甲氟喹(ASMQ)作为治疗药物的现状情景;以双氢青蒿素 - 哌喹(DP)加甲氟喹(MQ)作为治疗药物的三联ACT情景;以及以ASMQ作为治疗药物加DP作为化学预防药物的化学预防情景。我们预测在现状情景下甲氟喹耐药性会增加。三联ACT治疗逆转了甲氟喹耐药性的传播,但对总体疟疾发病率没有影响。对于基线参数集和大多数敏感性分析,在现状情景下联合甲氟喹 - 哌喹耐药性下降。与现状相比,在一些敏感性分析中,三联ACT治疗限制了甲氟喹耐药性的传播,但也减缓了哌喹耐药性的下降。化学预防情景降低了疟疾发病率,但增加了对甲氟喹和哌喹均耐药菌株的传播;在去除干预措施后,这两种影响开始逆转。我们得出结论,三联ACTs可能会限制柬埔寨甲氟喹耐药性的传播,但对疟疾发病率的影响有限,并且可能会减缓哌喹耐药性的下降。化学预防对发病率可能有更大影响,但也带来更高的耐药风险。需要采取积极策略限制大湄公河次区域的传播以实现消除目标,但任何干预措施都应伴随耐药性监测。