• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2010 年至 2018 年期间,英格兰为何有 231707 例超额死亡?对死亡率记录的生态学分析。

Why were there 231 707 more deaths than expected in England between 2010 and 2018? An ecological analysis of mortality records.

机构信息

Department of Geography and Planning, University of Liverpool, L69 7ZT Liverpool, UK.

Cathie Marsh Institute for Social Research, University of Manchester, M13 9BL, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

J Public Health (Oxf). 2022 Jun 27;44(2):310-318. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdab023.

DOI:10.1093/pubmed/fdab023
PMID:33765120
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8083632/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Policy responses to the Global Financial Crisis emphasized wide-ranging fiscal austerity measures, many of which have been found to negatively impact health outcomes. This paper investigates change in patterns of mortality at local authority level in England (2010-11 to 2017-18) and the relation with fiscal austerity measures.

METHODS

Data from official local authority administrative records are used to quantify the gap between observed deaths and what was anticipated in the 2010-based subnational population projections. Regression analyses are used to explore the relation between excess deaths, austerity and wider process of population change at local authority level.

RESULTS

We estimate 231 707 total excess deaths, the majority of which occurred since 2014-15 (89%) across the majority of local authorities (91%). Austerity is positively associated with excess deaths. For working age adults, there is a clear gradient to the impact of austerity, whereas for older adults, the impact is more uniform.

CONCLUSIONS

Fiscal austerity policies contributed to an excess of deaths for older people and widened social inequalities for younger populations. These results call for an end to all austerity measures and require further research into areas with the highest total excess deaths as a priority following the COVID-19 pandemic.

摘要

背景

应对全球金融危机的政策强调了广泛的财政紧缩措施,其中许多措施已被发现对健康结果产生负面影响。本文调查了英格兰地方当局一级死亡率模式的变化(2010-11 年至 2017-18 年)以及与财政紧缩措施的关系。

方法

使用官方地方当局行政记录中的数据来量化观察到的死亡人数与基于 2010 年的国家以下人口预测中预期的死亡人数之间的差距。回归分析用于探讨地方当局一级超额死亡、紧缩和更广泛的人口变化过程之间的关系。

结果

我们估计共有 231707 例总超额死亡,其中大多数发生在 2014-15 年以来(89%),大多数地方当局(91%)都有发生。紧缩与超额死亡呈正相关。对于劳动年龄成年人,紧缩的影响有明显的梯度,而对于老年人,影响则更为均匀。

结论

财政紧缩政策导致老年人超额死亡,并扩大了年轻人口的社会不平等。这些结果呼吁停止所有紧缩措施,并在 COVID-19 大流行后优先对总超额死亡人数最多的地区进行进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/000f/9234510/0210e1d05067/fdab023f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/000f/9234510/b0dbf7586de5/fdab023f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/000f/9234510/08a82d8870c2/fdab023f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/000f/9234510/0210e1d05067/fdab023f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/000f/9234510/b0dbf7586de5/fdab023f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/000f/9234510/08a82d8870c2/fdab023f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/000f/9234510/0210e1d05067/fdab023f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Why were there 231 707 more deaths than expected in England between 2010 and 2018? An ecological analysis of mortality records.2010 年至 2018 年期间,英格兰为何有 231707 例超额死亡?对死亡率记录的生态学分析。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2022 Jun 27;44(2):310-318. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdab023.
2
Inequalities in excess premature mortality in England during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional analysis of cumulative excess mortality by area deprivation and ethnicity.英格兰在 COVID-19 大流行期间超额过早死亡率的不平等:按地区贫困程度和种族划分的累积超额死亡率的横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 23;11(12):e052646. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052646.
3
Child morbidity and mortality associated with alternative policy responses to the economic crisis in Brazil: A nationwide microsimulation study.巴西经济危机的替代政策应对措施与儿童发病和死亡的关系:一项全国范围的微观模拟研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 May 22;15(5):e1002570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002570. eCollection 2018 May.
4
Excess years of life lost to COVID-19 and other causes of death by sex, neighbourhood deprivation, and region in England and Wales during 2020: A registry-based study.2020 年英格兰和威尔士因 COVID-19 和其他死因导致的超额寿命损失及其与性别、社区贫困程度和地区的关系:一项基于登记的研究。
PLoS Med. 2022 Feb 15;19(2):e1003904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003904. eCollection 2022 Feb.
5
Trends in gender and socioeconomic inequalities in mental health following the Great Recession and subsequent austerity policies: a repeat cross-sectional analysis of the Health Surveys for England.大衰退及随后的紧缩政策之后心理健康领域的性别和社会经济不平等趋势:对英格兰健康调查的重复横断面分析
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 30;8(8):e022924. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022924.
6
Inequalities in the evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic: an ecological study of inequalities in mortality in the first wave and the effects of the first national lockdown in England.COVID-19 大流行演变中的不平等现象:对第一波死亡率不平等现象及英格兰首次全国封锁影响的生态学研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 10;12(8):e058658. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058658.
7
Mental health and the jilted generation: Using age-period-cohort analysis to assess differential trends in young people's mental health following the Great Recession and austerity in England.心理健康与被抛弃的一代:使用年龄-时期-队列分析评估大衰退和英国紧缩政策后年轻人心理健康的差异趋势。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Oct;214:133-143. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.08.034. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
8
Bearing the burden of austerity: how do changing mortality rates in the UK compare between men and women?承受紧缩之重:英国男女死亡率变化如何对比?
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2022 Dec;76(12):1027-1033. doi: 10.1136/jech-2022-219645. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
9
Community factors and excess mortality in the COVID-19 pandemic in England, Italy and Sweden.英格兰、意大利和瑞典 COVID-19 大流行中的社区因素与超额死亡率
Eur J Public Health. 2023 Aug 1;33(4):695-703. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad075.
10
Trends in mental health inequalities in England during a period of recession, austerity and welfare reform 2004 to 2013.2004年至2013年经济衰退、财政紧缩和福利改革期间英格兰心理健康不平等状况的趋势
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Dec;147:324-31. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.11.009. Epub 2015 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Is Austerity Responsible for the Stalled Mortality Trends Across Many High-Income Countries? A Systematic Review.是否是财政紧缩导致了许多高收入国家的死亡率趋势停滞不前?一项系统综述。
Int J Soc Determinants Health Health Serv. 2024 Oct;54(4):362-379. doi: 10.1177/27551938241255041. Epub 2024 May 20.
2
Frailty before and during austerity: A time series analysis of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing 2002-2018.衰弱状况在紧缩政策之前和期间的变化:2002-2018 年英国老龄化纵向研究的时间序列分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 7;19(2):e0296014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296014. eCollection 2024.
3
Influenza: cause or excuse? An analysis of flu's influence on worsening mortality trends in England and Wales, 2010-19.
流感:病因还是借口?对 2010-19 年英格兰和威尔士死亡率趋势恶化中流感影响的分析。
Br Med Bull. 2024 Mar 13;149(1):72-89. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldad028.
4
Social security cuts and life expectancy: a longitudinal analysis of local authorities in England, Scotland and Wales.社会保障削减与预期寿命:对英格兰、苏格兰和威尔士地方当局的纵向分析
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2023 Nov 7;78(2):82-7. doi: 10.1136/jech-2023-220328.
5
When experts disagree: interviews with public health experts on health outcomes in the UK 2010-2020.当专家们意见不一时:英国 2010-2020 年健康结果的公共卫生专家访谈。
Public Health. 2023 Jan;214:96-105. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.10.019. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
6
Bearing the burden of austerity: how do changing mortality rates in the UK compare between men and women?承受紧缩之重:英国男女死亡率变化如何对比?
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2022 Dec;76(12):1027-1033. doi: 10.1136/jech-2022-219645. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
7
Same storm, different boats: can the UK recapture improving life expectancy trends?同一场风暴,不同的船只:英国能否重拾预期寿命上升的趋势?
J R Soc Med. 2021 Oct;114(10):463-466. doi: 10.1177/01410768211033895. Epub 2021 Jul 20.