Suppr超能文献

一种改良压力包扎法,用于避免使用一次性包皮环切缝合器进行包皮环切术后的严重出血,并探讨一次性包皮环切缝合器的出血机制。

A Modified Pressure Dressing to Avoid Severe Bleeding After Circumcision With a Disposable Circumcision Suture Device and a Discussion on the Mechanism of Bleeding With the Disposable Circumcision Suture Device.

作者信息

Jiang Wei, Fu Jia-Li, Guo Wen-Liang, Yan Zai-Chun, Zheng Ru-Qiang, Lu Ji-Ru, Lai Xiao-Dong

机构信息

Department of Urology, Dongying People's Hospital, Dongying, China.

Department of Urology, Dongying People's Hospital, Dongying, China.

出版信息

Sex Med. 2021 Apr;9(2):100288. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2020.100288. Epub 2021 Mar 22.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A novel type of a disposable circumcision suture device (DCSD) has been proved to be effective and safe; however, a few cases of severe bleeding took place after circumcisions.

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness of a modified double-layer pressure dressing to avoid severe bleeding after circumcision with the DCSD, in our department in a prospective randomized controlled study, and discuss the mechanism of bleeding with DCSD.

METHODS

Patients with redundant foreskin or phimosis were included between September 2018 and November 2019 and divided into 2 groups: In group A, the conventional pressure dressing was performed; in group B, an modified double-layer pressure dressing was performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The main outcomes and complications (surgical time, incidence of glans ischemia, severe bleeding rate, infection rate, pain level, total cost, and overall satisfaction) were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 624 patients were recruited for this study. There was no difference in the average age and body mass index between 2 groups. No patient suffered obvious glans ischemia. In group B, lower pain level, lower incidences of severe bleeding, and better satisfaction were recorded.

CONCLUSION

The mechanism of bleeding with the DCSD was discussed in this study, and the modified pressure dressing was proved effective, safe, and easy to perform. W Jiang, J-li Fu, W-l Guo, et al. A Modified Pressure Dressing to Avoid Severe Bleeding After Circumcision With a Disposable Circumcision Suture Device and a Discussion on the Mechanism of Bleeding With the Disposable Circumcision Suture Device. Sex Med 2021;9:100288.

摘要

引言

一种新型一次性包皮环切缝合器(DCSD)已被证明是有效且安全的;然而,包皮环切术后仍发生了几例严重出血的情况。

目的

在我们科室进行一项前瞻性随机对照研究,评估改良双层加压包扎在使用DCSD进行包皮环切术后避免严重出血的有效性,并探讨使用DCSD出血的机制。

方法

纳入2018年9月至2019年11月患有包皮过长或包茎的患者,并分为两组:A组采用传统加压包扎;B组采用改良双层加压包扎。

主要观察指标

收集并分析主要结局和并发症(手术时间、龟头缺血发生率、严重出血率、感染率、疼痛程度、总成本和总体满意度)。

结果

本研究共招募了624例患者。两组患者的平均年龄和体重指数无差异。没有患者出现明显的龟头缺血。B组记录到较低的疼痛程度、较低的严重出血发生率和更好的满意度。

结论

本研究探讨了使用DCSD出血的机制,证明改良加压包扎有效、安全且易于实施。蒋W、付J-li、郭W-l等。一种改良加压包扎以避免使用一次性包皮环切缝合器进行包皮环切术后严重出血及对一次性包皮环切缝合器出血机制的探讨。性医学2021;9:100288。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8335/8072179/176d007a9f18/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验