School of Geography and Remote Sensing, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
School of Geography and Remote Sensing, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China; Guangdong Province Engineering Technology Research Center for Geographical Conditions Monitoring and Comprehensive Analysis, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Aug 1;780:146586. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146586. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
Studying the structure of polycentric cities promotes a better understanding of the process of urban development and contributes to urban planning and management. However, existing studies cannot compare the level differences between urban centers and quantify the overall urban center development level within polycentric cities. Therefore, we combined nighttime light (NTL) data and the natural city (NC) to conduct this study from multiple perspectives. First, NCs were determined from Luojia-1A NTL data with high spatial resolution. Second, urban centers were selected from NCs. Third, urban center level (UCL) was proposed to compare the level differences of urban centers. Fourth, urban center development index (UCDI) was proposed to quantify the overall urban center development level within a polycentric city. A quantitative verification method was used to confirm that the detection accuracy of urban center identification is high. Furthermore, the applicability of the proposed method in different NTL datasets was verified by the identification of urban centers and the calculation of UCDIs. Unlike traditional methods, the shape and scope of the urban center identified using the proposed method are not restricted by administrative boundaries. Moreover, the level differences of urban centers and the overall urban center development level within a polycentric city, can be expressed by quantitative indicators, which helps in comparing the differences between urban centers.
研究多中心城市的结构可以促进对城市发展过程的更好理解,并有助于城市规划和管理。然而,现有的研究无法比较城市中心之间的水平差异,也无法量化多中心城市内的整体城市中心发展水平。因此,我们结合夜间灯光 (NTL) 数据和自然城市 (NC) 从多个角度进行了这项研究。首先,从高空间分辨率的珞珈一号 NTL 数据中确定了 NC。其次,从 NC 中选择了城市中心。第三,提出了城市中心水平 (UCL) 来比较城市中心的水平差异。第四,提出了城市中心发展指数 (UCDI) 来量化多中心城市内的整体城市中心发展水平。通过对城市中心识别的准确性进行定量验证,确认了城市中心识别的检测精度较高。此外,通过城市中心的识别和 UCDI 的计算,验证了该方法在不同 NTL 数据集下的适用性。与传统方法不同,使用所提出的方法识别的城市中心的形状和范围不受行政边界的限制。此外,城市中心之间的水平差异和多中心城市内的整体城市中心发展水平可以用定量指标来表示,这有助于比较城市中心之间的差异。